CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 272Cardiac Health and Mental HealthWorkplace Health and Well-beingCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological distress as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in the Whitehall II Study

Stansfeld, Stephen A, Fuhrer, Rebecca, Shipley, Martin J, Marmot, Michael G·2002·International Journal of Epidemiology
DOI 10.1093/ije/31.1.248
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric disorder and psychological distress are increasingly recognized as risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). Elucidation of the mechanisms of these associations has implications for prevention. This study aims to confirm the association between psychological distress and CHD and examine if it could be explained by other factors such as health behaviours, social isolation and low control at work. METHODS: A prospective occupational cohort study of London-based civil service employees (Whitehall II Study) with baseline data collected from 1985-1988 with a 5-year follow-up. The participants were male and female middle-aged civil servants working in 20 Government Departments; 73% of eligible employees attended baseline screening. Psychological distress measured by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) at baseline was used to predict incidence of self-reported CHD and possible and probable electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities during follow-up. RESULTS: In men, baseline psychological distress was associated with an increased incidence of overall self-reported CHD (odds ratios [OR] = 1.83, 95% CI : 1.5-2.3) and ECG abnormalities (OR = 1.51, 95% CI : 1.1-2.1), after adjustment for age, employment grade and length of follow-up. In women, baseline psychological distress was also associated with an increased incidence of CHD (OR = 1.60, 95% CI : 1.2-2.1), but not with ECG abnormalities. Adjustment for health behaviours, marital status, social networks and work characteristics reduced the risks for incident CHD by 12% in men and by 10% in women; for ECG abnormalities these adjustments increased the risk in men by 16% and had little effect in women. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of psychological distress confers increased risk of CHD in men that is not explained by health behaviours, social isolation or work characteristics. The increased risk of CHD associated with psychological distress is not consistently demonstrated in women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/31.1.248

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Goldberg DP. Detecting Pychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Maudsley Monograph 21. London: Oxford University Press,1972.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stansfeld, S. A., Fuhrer, R., Shipley, M. J., & Marmot, M. G.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Stansfeld, Stephen A
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2002-02
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
248-255
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
DOI
10.1093/ije/31.1.248
OpenAlex
W2107338771
Cited by
272
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01-HS06516)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01-AG13196, R01AG013196)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL36310, R01HL036310)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
psychological distress, coronary artery disease, risk factors, electrocardiographic abnormalities, public sector employees, sex differences, health behavior, social isolation, job control, occupational cohort, General Health Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adult, Coronary Disease, Electrocardiography, Employment, England, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Social Isolation, Stress, Psychological, Cohort Studies, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review