Cited by 163Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyNutritional Studies and Diet

Work and leisure time physical activity assessed using a simple, pragmatic, validated questionnaire and incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women: The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer in Norfolk prospective population study

Khaw, Kay-Tee, Jakes, Rupert, Bingham, Sheila, Welch, Ailsa, Luben, Robert, Day, Nicholas, Wareham, Nicholas·2006·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The health benefits of physical activity are well established, but the overall amount of physical activity associated with cardiovascular and other health outcomes, and whether the relationships are similar in men and women and at different ages is still debated. This may be partly related to different methods for assessing physical activity. Most studies have focused on leisure time physical activity. METHODS: We examined the prospective relationship between usual physical activity, taking into account both leisure and work activity, using a simple, pragmatic, four-point rating scale validated against heart rate monitoring, and cardiovascular disease incidence and total mortality after an average 8 years follow-up in 22,191 community living men and women aged 45-79 years with no known cardiovascular disease or cancer at baseline. RESULTS: The relative risks (95% confidence interval) for all-cause mortality (1,553 deaths) for men and women who were moderately inactive, moderately active, and active compared with those who were inactive were 0.83 (0.73-0.95), 0.68 (0.58-0.80), and 0.68 (0.57-0.81), respectively, after adjusting for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, blood cholesterol, cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, diabetes, body mass index, and social class. The relationships were also consistent for cardiovascular disease incidence (3,079 events), in subgroups stratified by age, sex, body mass index, smoking status and social class, and after excluding deaths in the first 2 years. The combined scale was more consistently associated with mortality than the individual work and leisure time components separately. CONCLUSIONS: When both work and leisure time physical activity patterns are taken into account, using a simple, pragmatic, validated questionnaire feasible for use in clinical and public health practice, even very moderate levels of usual physical activity are associated with significantly reduced risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease in men and women in the general population and potential population attributable impact of 14% for inactive compared with active levels. These findings may encourage efforts to increase physical activity levels not only in leisure time but also in usual daily working life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyl079

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lee IM. Physical activity in women: how much is good enough? JAMA 2003;290:1377-79.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khaw, K.-T., Jakes, R., Bingham, S., Welch, A., Luben, R., Day, N., & Wareham, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit (GB)
  • MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Khaw, Kay-Tee
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2006-05-18
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
1034-1043
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2139160844
Cited by
163
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Stroke Association
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
physical activity, work-related physical activity, leisure-time physical activity, cardiovascular disease incidence, all-cause mortality, physical activity questionnaire, sex differences, population attributable risk, middle-aged and older adults, EPIC-Norfolk
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Diabetes Mellitus, England, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Leisure Activities, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Motor Activity, Population Surveillance, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk, Smoking, Social Class, Work, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review