Cited by 219Health disparities and outcomesStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyBirth, Development, and Health

A structured approach to modelling the effects of binary exposure variables over the life course

Open access
Mishra, Gita, Nitsch, Dorothea, Black, Stephanie, De Stavola, Bianca, Kuh, Diana, Hardy, Rebecca·2009·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the relationship between time spent in adverse circumstances across life course and increased risk of chronic disease and early mortality. This accumulation hypothesis is usually tested by summing indicators of binary variables across the life span to form an overall score that is then used as the exposure in regression models for health outcomes. This article highlights potential issues in the interpretation of results obtained from such an approach. METHODS: We propose a model-building framework that can be used to formally compare alternative hypotheses on the effect of multiple binary exposure measurements collected across the life course. The saturated model where the order and value of the binary variable at each time point influence the outcome of interest is compared with nested alternative specifications corresponding to the critical period, cumulative risk or hypotheses about the effect of changes in environment. This framework is illustrated with data on adult body mass index and socioeconomic position measured once in childhood and twice in adulthood from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development, using a series of liner regression models. RESULTS: We demonstrate how analyses that only consider the association of a cumulative score with a later outcome may produce misleading results. CONCLUSION: We recommend comparing a set of nested models-each corresponding to the accumulation, critical period and effect modification hypotheses-to an all-inclusive (saturated) model. This approach can provide a formal and clearer understanding of the relative merits of these alternative hypotheses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyn229

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparing hypothesized models against a saturated model using an F-test cannot be extended to continuous exposures, as the required saturated model would have as many parameters as study participants.

    “Other statistical methods applicable to the structured approach exist, such as comparing hypothesized models against a saturated model using an F-test.12 This cannot be extended to continuous exposures, as the required saturated model would have as many parameters as study participants.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishra, G., Nitsch, D., Black, S., De Stavola, B., Kuh, D., & Hardy, R.
Affiliations
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Mishra, Gita
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2008-11-21
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
528-537
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2121611632
Cited by
218
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
life course exposure, nested model comparison, saturated models, critical period hypothesis, effect modification, body mass index, socioeconomic position, MRC National Survey of Health and Development
MeSH terms
Critical Period, Psychological, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Social Mobility, Socioeconomic Factors, Models, Statistical, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review