Cited by 160Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsHealthcare Systems and Public HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Southall And Brent REvisited: cohort profile of SABRE, a UK population-based comparison of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in people of European, Indian Asian and African Caribbean origins

Open access
Tillin, Therese, Forouhi, Nita G, McKeigue, Paul M, Chaturvedi, Nish·2012·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Comparisons of chronic disease in migrant and host populations have provided valuable aetiological insights, and furthered the understanding of balance between genetic and environmental influences on the disease. The UK is home to several migrant groups, the largest and longest established being of Indian Asian and African Caribbean origins. One of the earliest and largest waves of Indian Asian migration to the UK followed the 1947 partition of India. As these migrants reached middle age in the 1970s, it became increasingly apparent, both in the UK and elsewhere overseas, that this population was at greatly increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), both coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, compared with host populations.1–6 Initial exploration of conventional risk factors, such as diet, total cholesterol, smoking and blood pressure, showed that these differed markedly between ethnic subgroups and were often more favourable than the host UK population, and therefore these factors could not account for the excess CVD risk observed in all Indian Asian subgroups (such as Indians of Gujarati/Hindu Punjabi/Sikh Punjabi origin, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis). Notably, a greater prevalence of diabetes was found in all Indian Asian subgroups, which linked with the observation of greater fasting hyperinsulinaemia, led us to hypothesize that insulin resistance, associated with upper body fat distribution, could underpin the excess diabetes, hypertriglyceridaemia and CHD in Indian Asians.3 This hypothesis was tested in the Southall study, a large population-based inter-ethnic cross-sectional study of middle-aged men and women carried out between 1988 and 1990.7 A large number of migrants of Black African descent from the Caribbean and West Africa also arrived in the UK during the post–Second World War period, encouraged by the UK government in an effort to fill the many vacancies for key workers.8 As these African Caribbean migrants were also reaching middle age in the 1980s, an intriguing paradox was emerging in the UK, which had been noted previously in similar populations in the USA and Caribbean. Despite high rates of diabetes, people of African and African Caribbean descent had relatively low CHD risks compared with White European ethnic origin populations.6,9–11 In stark contrast, stroke-related mortality was doubled and mortality from hypertensive disease was increased between 4-fold (men) and 7-fold (women) in Caribbean-born migrants compared with the general UK population.10 The latter finding was especially puzzling, as previous population-based studies did not provide unequivocal evidence that blood pressure or the prevalence of hypertension were elevated in people of Black African descent.12–14 Exploration of the diabetes/CHD paradox and definitive exploration of ethnic differences in resting and ambulatory blood pressure formed the basis of the Brent population-based comparison of African Caribbean and European middle-aged men and women.15 This cross-sectional comparison followed the successful completion of the Southall study in 1990. The Southall and Brent studies were performed according to identical protocols by the same team, using the same equipments and hospital laboratories. The geographical areas of the baseline studies are contiguous and the two studies were conducted consecutively. In order to improve statistical power, the two baseline data sets have now been amalgamated. Together, the Southall and Brent studies form the basis of the largest UK population-based tri-ethnic cohort. Cross-sectional analysis of the Southall and Brent studies yielded important information on disease prevalence and associations (see below), but could only hint at causality. In addition, first-generation migrants as a cohort are now reaching pensionable age, where disease burden is anticipated to be high, yet little data exist for this age group. In particular, heart failure, as a consequence of CHD, diabetes and hypertension, a rarity in middle-aged individuals, now becomes especially prevalent, causing more than one-third of all deaths in older age.16 Finally, interim mortality follow-up analyses of this cohort showed striking ethnic differences in the effects of dysglycaemia on CVD mortality (see What Has It Found? section), adding urgency to the need for follow-up study of cardiometabolic health and the mechanisms underlying ethnic differences. The Southall And Brent REvisited (SABRE) study was initiated in 2008 as a 20-year follow-up of the two baseline studies. Ethics committee approval was obtained for both baseline studies as well as for SABRE. Broadly, the baseline studies were set up to examine, in cross section, the associations between components of the insulin resistance or ‘metabolic’ syndrome in each of the three ethnic groups and to determine how these associations might underlie the higher rates of CHD in Indian Asians and the higher rates of hypertensive target organ damage and stroke in Afri

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyq175

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Type 2 diabetes is five times more likely in Pakistani women, at least three times more likely in Bangladeshi and Black Caribbean women compared with women in the general population.

    “Type 2 Diabetes is on the increase (Diabetes UK, 2015) but when compared with women in the general population, diabetes is five times more likely in Pakistani women, at least three times more likely in Bangladeshi and Black Caribbean women (Diabetes UK, 2012; Tillin et al., 2012).”

    From Guyanese Women's Experiences of Invisibility in Health Care in England (2020) · cites this paper as Tillin et al., 2012

    In “What has it found?” (Table 3; page not provided), diabetes by WHO criteria is reported in 20% of African Caribbean women versus 4% of European women, supporting the claim of at least a threefold difference for Black Caribbean women. The table groups South Asian women as “Indian Asian”; it does not report separate rates for Pakistani or Bangladeshi women. European women in this cohort are also not identified as women in the general population. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Risk factor prevalence varies between countries as well as within countries.

    “Risk factor prevalence varies between countries(36) as well as within countries.(37)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tillin, T., Forouhi, N. G., McKeigue, P. M., & Chaturvedi, N.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Tillin, Therese
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
33-42
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2162129089
Cited by
160
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
sabre, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, stroke, hypertension, insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, migrant health, Southall, Brent
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Europe, Female, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Humans, India, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Caribbean Region, Black People, White People, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review