The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: which analyses should be used?
Abstract
Background: Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are increasingly used to assess the effectiveness of health interventions. Three main analysis approaches are: cluster-level analyses, mixed-models and generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Mixed models and GEEs can lead to inflated type I error rates with a small number of clusters, and numerous small-sample corrections have been proposed to circumvent this problem. However, the impact of these methods on power is still unclear. Methods: We performed a simulation study to assess the performance of 12 analysis approaches for CRTs with a continuous outcome and 40 or fewer clusters. These included weighted and unweighted cluster-level analyses, mixed-effects models with different degree-of-freedom corrections, and GEEs with and without a small-sample correction. We assessed these approaches across different values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), numbers of clusters and variability in cluster sizes. Results: Unweighted and variance-weighted cluster-level analysis, mixed models with degree-of-freedom corrections, and GEE with a small-sample correction all maintained the type I error rate at or below 5% across most scenarios, whereas uncorrected approaches lead to inflated type I error rates. However, these analyses had low power (below 50% in some scenarios) when fewer than 20 clusters were randomized, with none reaching the expected 80% power. Conclusions: Small-sample corrections or variance-weighted cluster-level analyses are recommended for the analysis of continuous outcomes in CRTs with a small number of clusters. The use of these corrections should be incorporated into the sample size calculation to prevent studies from being underpowered.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the empirical performance of some of those methods in terms of confidence interval coverage, type I error rates, and accuracy of standard error estimates has not been reported thoroughly, especially for cRCTs with a small number of clusters per condition [7, 8, 13].”
In the citing paper
“To mitigate the risk of inflating Type I error given the small number of clusters, we will use the Kenward-Roger degrees of freedom correction, which does not rely on the assumption of fixed cluster sizes [83].”
In the citing paper
“It was common for cluster RCTs to have too few clusters to achieve balance between intervention and control groups and in some it was unclear whether clustering was adequately dealt with in the analysis85.”
From A systematic review and meta-analysis of effects of early life non-cognitive skills on academic, psychosocial, cognitive and health outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [85]
Citations
Cites
lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13 · Cited by 24,346
Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood
Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533558 · Cited by 4,552
Models for Longitudinal Data: A Generalized Estimating Equation Approach
Zeger, S. L., Liang, K., & Albert, P. S. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531734 · Cited by 4,505
An Approximate Distribution of Estimates of Variance Components
Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3002019 · Cited by 4,373
Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research
Davis, W. W. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2001.s433 · Cited by 1,735
lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2013) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.lmertest · Cited by 1,327
Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research
DONNER, A. P., & Klar, N. S. (2000) · Cited by 1,236
Ukoumunne, Gulliford, M. C., Chinn, Sterne, & Burney, P. (1999) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta3050 · Cited by 1,211
Hayes, R., & Moulton, L. H. (2009) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781584888178 · Cited by 881
Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials
Hayes, R., & Bennett, S. (1999) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/28.2.319 · Cited by 824
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Campbell, 2014, How to Design, Analyse and Report Cluster Randomized Trials in Medicine and Health Related Research
- PROC MIXED, Mixed Models Theory: SAS/STAT(R) 9.2 User’s Guide
- Cook, Small-sample robust variance correction for generalized estimating equations for use in cluster randomized clinical trials
- Halekoh, 2016, Parametric Bootstrap and Kenward Roger Based Methods for Mixed Model Comparison
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hemming, K., Kasza, J., Hooper, R., Forbes, A. B., & Taljaard, M. (2019) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyz237 · Cited by 235
“Furthermore, we have relaxed large-sample assumptions by using critical values from the t-distribution, but the corresponding degrees of freedom used have not been verified for designs other than the simple parallel CRT with continuous outcomes.(49,54) For parallel CRTs, these degrees of freedom corrections result in…”
BackgroundMethodSmithers, L. G., Sawyer, A. C. P., Chittleborough, C. R., Davies, N. M., Davey Smith, G., & Lynch, J. W. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0461-x · Cited by 175
Estimands in cluster-randomized trials: choosing analyses that answer the right question
Kahan, B. C., Li, F., Copas, A. J., & Harhay, M. O. (2022) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyac131 · Cited by 127
“Although there are several small-sample adjustment methods that improve standard error estimation in such settings, cluster-level analyses are sometimes preferred as they are less prone to small-sample biases, as shown in simulation studies.(24) However, as described above, these technical decisions can result in the…”
Self-citationBlackwood, B., Tume, L. N., Morris, K., Clarke, M. J., McDowell, C., Hemming, K., Peters, M. J., McIlmurray, L., Jordan, J., Agus, A. M., et al. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.10296 · Cited by 106
Key considerations for designing, conducting and analysing a cluster randomized trial
Hemming, K., & Taljaard, M. (2023) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyad064 · Cited by 100
“92 If an individual-level analysis is preferred, two main approaches to accommodating the non-independence are generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) and generalized estimating equations (GEE).”
Gallis, J. A., & Turner, E. L. (2019) · Annals of Global Health · doi:10.5334/aogh.2581 · Cited by 86
Shaygan, M., Yazdani, Z., & Valibeygi, A. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03085-6 · Cited by 83
Symeonides, C., Vacy, K., Thomson, S., Tanner, S., Chua, H. K., Dixit, S., Mansell, T., O’Hely, M., Novakovic, B., Herbstman, J. B., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48897-8 · Cited by 66
“Given the small number of clusters (i.e. animals), bootstrapped standard errors were estimated using 200 repeats to maintain a conservative type 1 error rate 104 .”
Effect of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Intervention on Adverse Drug Events
Tamblyn, R. M., Abrahamowicz, M., Buckeridge, D. L., Bustillo, M., Forster, A. J., Girard, N., Habib, B., Hanley, J. A., Huang, A. R., Kurteva, S., et al. (2019) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10756 · Cited by 71
Kang, J., & Jeong, Y. J. (2019) · International Journal of Nursing Practice · doi:10.1111/ijn.12786 · Cited by 58
Multiple imputation by predictive mean matching in cluster-randomized trials
Bailey, B. E., Andridge, R., & Shoben, A. B. (2020) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-020-00948-6 · Cited by 52
“not be the most appropriate or most powerful analysis approach [8, 9].”
BackgroundThompson, J. A., Hemming, K., Forbes, A. B., Fielding, K., & Hayes, R. (2020) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280220958735 · Cited by 51
Bellier, A., Secheresse, T., Stoeckle, A., Dols, A., & Chaffanjon, P. C. (2019) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1918 · Cited by 45
Hemming, K., Taljaard, M., Weijer, C., & Forbes, A. B. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m3800 · Cited by 47
Randomized controlled trials in de-implementation research: a systematic scoping review
Raudasoja, A., Falkenbach, P., Vernooij, R. W. M., Mustonen, J. M. J., Agarwal, A., Aoki, Y., Blanker, M. H., Cartwright, R., García‐Perdomo, H. A., Kilpeläinen, T. P., et al. (2022) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01238-z · Cited by 43
Baumgartner, J. C., Clark, S. N., Carter, E. M., Lai, A. M., Zhang, Y., Shan, M., Schauer, J. J., & Yang, X. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b02061 · Cited by 43
Naef, R., Filipovic, M., Jeitziner, M., von Felten, S., Safford, J., Riguzzi, M., & Rufer, M. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06454-y · Cited by 48
Thompson, J. A., Leyrat, C., Fielding, K., & Hayes, R. (2022) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-022-01699-2 · Cited by 43
“cluster-level analyses and GEEs, and a similar power as inverse variance weighted cluster-level analyses [11].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationHow the Cluster-randomized Trial “Works”
Hurley, J. C. (2019) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciz554 · Cited by 36
Education Increases Disposal of Unused Opioids After Total Joint Arthroplasty
Nahhas, C. R., Hannon, C. P., Yang, J., Gerlinger, T. L., Nam, D., & Valle, C. J. D. (2020) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.19.01166 · Cited by 35
Morrow, A., Hogden, E., Kang, Y., Steinberg, J., Canfell, K., Solomon, M. J., Kench, J. G., Gill, A. J., Shaw, T. J., Pachter, N., et al. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6 · Cited by 34
Yohanna, S., Naylor, K. L., Mucsi, I., McKenzie, S. Q., Belenko, D., Blake, P. G., Coghlan, C., Dixon, S. N., Elliott, L., Getchell, L. E., et al. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · doi:10.1177/2054358121997266 · Cited by 36
Li, T., Ding, W., Li, X., & Lin, A. (2019) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s215719 · Cited by 32
“01, the Satterthwaite correction is used to obtain an approximation of the degree of freedom to control the type I error rate.(44) When calculating the sample size, the type II error was controlled within 10%, which could appropriately improve the power of the test to some extent.”
MethodConsiderations for first field trials of low-threshold gene drive for malaria vector control
Connolly, J. B., Burt, A., Christophides, G. K., Diabaté, A., Habtewold, T., Hancock, P. A., James, A. A., Kayondo, J., Lwetoijera, D. W., Manjurano, A. M., et al. (2024) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-024-04952-9 · Cited by 33
“As with the design of any cRCT, the amount of variation in entomological measurements between trial locations also will be a factor in determining the number of clusters required in control and intervention arms of the field trials involving low threshold gene drive [15, 50, 158–160] .”
BackgroundClemes, S. A., Varela-Mato, V., Bodicoat, D. H., Brookes, C. L., Chen, Y., Edwardson, C. L., Gray, L. J., Guest, A. J., Johnson, V., Munir, F., et al. (2022) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02372-7 · Cited by 37
“Due to the number of clusters [39], the primary analysis was performed using a mixed effects linear regression model with each participant’s daily average number of steps (measured using the activPAL, across any valid day(s)) at 6 months as the outcome, adjusting for their daily average number of steps at baseline and…”
MethodSidibé, A., Meldrum, G., Coulibaly, H., Padulosi, S., Traore, I. S., Diawara, G., Sangaré, A. R., & Mbosso, C. (2020) · Plant Genetic Resources · doi:10.1017/s1479262120000076 · Cited by 30
Demystifying estimands in cluster-randomised trials
Kahan, B. C., Blette, B. S., Harhay, M. O., Halpern, S. D., Jairath, V., Copas, A. J., & Li, F. (2024) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802241254197 · Cited by 37
“Furthermore, cluster-randomised trials often have a small number of clusters, and so further research into these methods to evaluate their performance in small-sample settings is warranted (though we note the cluster-specific, cluster-average estimator has been well studied in this setting [15, 18, 25, 38]).”
InfluentialSelf-citationHe, S., & Stein, A. D. (2020) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmaa107 · Cited by 29
“, small-sample corrections or varianceweighted cluster-level analyses) (n = 2) (18); or the analysis not based on original assignment, but used difference-indifference modeling strategy (n = 2).”
BackgroundWong, C. L., Choi, K. C., Chen, J., Law, B. M. H., Chan, D. N. S., & So, W. K. W. (2021) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.031 · Cited by 28
Community Health Workers in Early Childhood Well-Child Care for Medicaid-Insured Children
Coker, T. R., Liljenquist, K. S., Lowry, S., Fiscella, K. A., Weaver, M. R., Ortiz, J., LaFontaine, R., Silva, J., Salaguinto, T., Johnson, G., et al. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.7197 · Cited by 27
Nevins, P., Ryan, M. M., Davis‐Plourde, K. L., Ouyang, Y., Macedo, J. A. P., Meng, C., Tong, G., Wang, X., Ortiz‐Reyes, L., Caille, A., et al. (2023) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/17407745231208397 · Cited by 30
“9,10 11–13 As in other trial designs, adjusting for prespecified baseline prognostic factors in the analysis can help control for potential confounding, improve power and efficiency, and mitigate potential bias due to attrition, although ability to conduct covariate-adjusted analyses may be limited…”
BackgroundMcKenzie, J. E., Taljaard, M., Hemming, K., Arnup, S. J., Giraudeau, B., Eldridge, S. M., Hooper, R., Kahan, B. C., Li, T., Moher, D., et al. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-080472 · Cited by 32
“80 Any adjustments applied should be reported.”
Self-citationLiu, T., Leung, D. K. Y., Lu, S., Kwok, W.-W., Sze, L., Tse, S. S.-K., Ng, S., Wong, P. W. C., LOU, V. W. Q., Tang, J. Y. ‐., et al. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06122-1 · Cited by 25
“to maintain the desired type I error rate [52].”
BackgroundInformative cluster size in cluster-randomised trials: A case study from the TRIGGER trial
Kahan, B. C., Li, F., Blette, B. S., Jairath, V., Copas, A. J., & Harhay, M. O. (2023) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/17407745231186094 · Cited by 24
“7,24 To examine the expected variability between the cluster-and participant-average estimators when there was no informative cluster size, we conducted a small simulation study to explore this; details are in the Supplemental Material.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationImpact of Upgraded Lighting on Falls in Care Home Residents
Grant, L. K., Hilaire, M. A. S., Heller, J. P., Heller, R. A., Lockley, S. W., & Rahman, S. A. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.013 · Cited by 25
Nevins, P., Davis‐Plourde, K. L., Macedo, J. A. P., Ouyang, Y., Ryan, M., Tong, G., Wang, X., Meng, C., Ortiz‐Reyes, L., Li, F., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.010 · Cited by 23
Design and analysis of three‐arm parallel cluster randomized trials with small numbers of clusters
Watson, S., Girling, A. J., & Hemming, K. (2020) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.8828 · Cited by 22
Weather information and agricultural outcomes: Evidence from a pilot field experiment in Benin
Yegbemey, R. N., Bensch, G., & Vance, C. (2023) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106178 · Cited by 19
Marinucci, A., Grové, C., Allen, K., & Riebschleger, J. (2021) · Mental Health & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.mhp.2021.200216 · Cited by 21
Thomsen, L. T., Schmidt‐Persson, J., Damsgaard, C. T., Krustrup, P., Grøntved, A., Krølner, R. F., Nielsen, G., Lundbye‐Jensen, J., Skovgaard, T., Mølgaard, C., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308142 · Cited by 18
Methods for dealing with unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials: a scoping review
Zhan, D., Xu, L., Ouyang, Y., Sawatzky, R., & Wong, H. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255389 · Cited by 18
“[12] extended Johnson et al.’s work by considering also the Satherwaite denominator degrees of freedom in the mixed effects model, the Wilcoxon rank sum test in the cluster-level analysis, and GEEs with or without small-sample corrected robust standard error (SE) estimators.”
BackgroundMethodHigher survival but smaller size of juvenile Dungeness crab (Metacarcinus magister) in high CO2
McElhany, P., Busch, D. S., Lawrence, A., Maher, M. T., Perez, D., Reinhardt, E. M., Rovinski, K., & Tully, E. M. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2022.151781 · Cited by 18
Luo, H., Lou, V. W. Q., Chen, C., & Chi, I. (2020) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gny120 · Cited by 18
Type I error control for cluster randomized trials under varying small sample structures
Nugent, J. R., & Kleinman, K. (2021) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01236-7 · Cited by 18
“[18] evaluated the power and TIE rates of different degrees of freedom (DF) choices for LMMs with Wald hypothesis tests for CRT designs under various design factors.”
MethodCluster randomized controlled trial analysis at the cluster level: The clan command
Thompson, J. A., Leurent, B., Nash, S., Moulton, L. H., & Hayes, R. (2023) · The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x231196294 · Cited by 17
Self-citationHow should a cluster randomized trial be analyzed?
Billot, L., Copas, A. J., Leyrat, C., Forbes, A. B., & Turner, E. L. (2024) · Journal of Epidemiology and Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.jeph.2024.202196 · Cited by 17
“These corrections involve a modification of the number of degrees of freedom used to construct confidence intervals and perform statistical tests but may also involve a correction to the estimates of the standard errors them-selves [17].”
MethodSelf-citationYang, S., Starks, M. A., Hernandez, A. F., Turner, E. L., Califf, R. M., O’Connor, C. M., Mentz, R. J., & Choudhury, K. R. (2019) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2019.04.016 · Cited by 17
Li, M., Kwok, S. W. H., Tan, J.-Y. B., Bressington, D. T., Liu, X., Wang, T., & Chen, S.-L. (2023) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102380 · Cited by 18
Rosales, C. B., Denman, C. A., Bell, M. L., Cornejo, E., Ingram, M., del Carmen Castro Vásquez, M., Gonzalez-Fagoaga, J. E., Aceves, B., Nuño, T., Anderson, E. J., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyab072 · Cited by 15
Peñalva, G., Crespo‐Rivas, J. C., Guisado-Gil, A. B., Rodríguez-Villodres, Á., Pachón-Ibáñez, M. E., Cachero-Alba, B., Rivas-Romero, B., Gil-Moreno, J., Galvá-Borras, M. I., García-Moreno, M., et al. (2022) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciac834 · Cited by 15
“In order to control this bias, we used random effects, restricted maximum likelihood estimation, and the Satterthwaite degrees-of-freedom correction to minimize the type I error in studies with small samples, allowing improved parameter estimation accuracy [30].”
MethodEffect Partitioning in Cross-Sectionally Clustered Data Without Multilevel Models
McNeish, D. (2019) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2019.1602504 · Cited by 15
Fodjo, J. N. S., Vieri, M. K., Ngarka, L., Njamnshi, W. Y., Nfor, L. N., Mengnjo, M. K., Hendy, A., Enyong, P., Palmer, D., Basáñez, M.-G., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050341 · Cited by 15
“Final anonymised datasets will be deposited in appropriate data repositories and available on reasonable request.”
Backgroundde Oliveira, R. P., Alencar, C. D. M., Silva, F. A., Magno, M. B., Maia, L. C., & Silva, C. M. (2020) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103498 · Cited by 14
Grantham, K. L., Kasza, J., Heritier, S., Carlin, J., & Forbes, A. (2022) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-022-01550-8 · Cited by 16
“Our results for REML estimation are consistent with several studies for parallel CRTs where a KR approximation or similar degrees of freedom correction were found to better maintain the type I error rate [9, 11, 12].”
ResultKuringe, E., Christensen, A., Materu, J., Drake, M., Majani, E., Casalini, C., Mjungu, D., Mbita, G., Kalage, E., Komba, A., et al. (2022) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/30372 · Cited by 14
“Descriptive analysis was done using standard methods for the analysis of a pair-matched cluster randomized trial with a small number of clusters [44].”
MethodRandomization-based confidence intervals for cluster randomized trials
Rabideau, D. J., & Wang, R. (2020) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa007 · Cited by 14
Nugent, J. R., Marquez, C., Charlebois, E. D., Abbott, R., & Balzer, L. B. (2023) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxad015 · Cited by 14
Ouyang, Y., Xu, L., Karim, M. E., Gustafson, P., & Wong, H. (2021) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106255 · Cited by 13
Monge-Olivares, L., Peñalva, G., Pulido, M. R., Bárcena, L. G., Doval, M. Á., Ballesta, S., Merchante, N., del Real, P. R., Gómez, L. C., Hortal, G. C., et al. (2025) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2025.123706 · Cited by 13
Sidik, S. M., Jaffar, A., Foo, C. N., Muhammad, N. A., Manaf, R. A., Ismail, S. I. F., Alagirisamy, P., Fazlah, A. F. A., Suli, Z. B., & Goodyear‐Smith, F. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039076 · Cited by 13
Giovannetti, A. M., Pakenham, K. I., Presti, G., Quartuccio, M. E., Confalonieri, P., Bergamaschi, R., Grobberio, M., Di Filippo, M., Micheli, M., Brichetto, G., et al. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267245 · Cited by 11
“To mitigate the risk of inflating Type I error given the small number of clusters, we will use the KenwardRoger degrees of freedom correction, which does not rely on the assumption of fixed cluster sizes [83].”
MethodHemming, K., Taljaard, M., Gkini, E., & Bishop, J. R. B. (2023) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-023-01384-1 · Cited by 14
“Analysis of cluster-level proportions, as with sample size justification, should also use t -distributions on k-2 degrees of freedom and might need to consider weighting if cluster sizes vary considerably [15].”
MethodQiu, H., Cook, A. J., & Bobb, J. F. (2023) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9950 · Cited by 13
“An important area of application where such issues arise is cluster-randomized trials (CRTs).”
BackgroundA Simulation Study of Statistical Approaches to Data Analysis in the Stepped Wedge Design
Ren, Y., Hughes, J. P., & Heagerty, P. J. (2019) · Statistics in Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12561-019-09259-x · Cited by 15
Phase I, II and III Trials in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Practical Guide for the Non-specialist
D’Amico, F., Baumann, C., Rousseau, H., Danese, S., & Peyrin‐Biroulet, L. (2019) · Journal of Crohn s and Colitis · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz214 · Cited by 11
Li, S., Mi, B., Qu, P., Liu, D., Lei, F., Wang, D., Zeng, L., Kang, Y., Shen, Y. L., Pei, L., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-020-02309-x · Cited by 12
Shaygan, M., Jahandide, Z., & Zarifsanaiey, N. (2021) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-021-02891-5 · Cited by 11
“Because of the hierarchical structure of the data, an adjustment for clustering was needed [40].”
BackgroundSo, W. K. W., Chan, D. N. S., Law, B. M. H., Choi, K. C., Krishnasamy, M., & Chan, C. W. H. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104254 · Cited by 11
Golzarri-Arroyo, L., Dickinson, S. L., Jamshidi-Naeini, Y., Zoh, R. S., Brown, A. W., Owora, A. H., Li, P., Oakes, J. M., & Allison, D. B. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106654 · Cited by 9
Lange, K. M., Sullivan, T., Kasza, J., & Yelland, L. N. (2024) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.10201 · Cited by 10
“The use of small sample corrections improved the performance of mixed models and GEEs, as has also been seen for cluster randomized trials, 50-54 and should be considered in these settings.”
Buthelezi, M. S., Mentz, G. B., Wright, C. Y., Phaswana, S., Garland, R. M., & Naidoo, R. N. (2024) · Environmental Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ee9.0000000000000354 · Cited by 12
“42 Thus, the available sample of approximately 700 children clustered into six schools had adequate power to test our hypothesis.”
BackgroundKaelin, V., Villegas, V. C., Chen, Y., Murphy, N. J., Papautsky, E. L., Dooling-Litfin, J. K., Leland, N. E., Maheshwari, V., McManus, B. M., & Khetani, M. A. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051582 · Cited by 10
Ratnayake, R., Peyraud, N., Ciglenečki, I., Gignoux, E., Lightowler, M. S., Azman, A. S., Gakima, P., Ouamba, J. P., Sagara, J. A., Ndombe, R., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061206 · Cited by 10
Ivermectin treatment in humans for reducing malaria transmission
de Souza, D. K., Thomas, R., Bradley, J., Leyrat, C., Boakye, D. A., & Okebe, J. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013117.pub2 · Cited by 9
Self-citationSample size estimation for stratified individual and cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes
Kennedy‐Shaffer, L., & Hughes, M. D. (2020) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.8492 · Cited by 10
“44,45 49 Our determination of the relationship between the within-stratum ICCs and the ICC in the overall unstratified population given by equations (15) and (17), and hence also of the ratio, R C RT , of sample sizes needed with and without stratification, rests on the definition of the ICC used.”
Gallandat, K., Jeandron, A., Ross, I., Saidi, J. M., Rumedeka, B. B., Kapepula, L., Cousens, S. N., Allen, E., MacDougall, A. M., & Cumming, O. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05249-x · Cited by 10
Interim data monitoring in cluster randomised trials: Practical issues and a case study
Hemming, K., Martín, J., Gallos, I. D., Coomarasamy, A., & Middleton, L. (2021) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/17407745211024751 · Cited by 10
“This means not only appropriate consideration of clustering, but this might also require the use of small sample corrections in trials with less than about 40 clusters.(13) In practice, this means there will often be considerable uncertainty around the values of these nuisance parameters at any sample size re-estimati…”
Offorha, B. C., Walters, S. J., & Jacques, R. (2023) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-023-02107-z · Cited by 9
“When the sample size is small (which is a recipe for imbalance) the robust SE estimator of GEE1 does not provide full protection over incorrect working correlation structure, causing GEE1 to have reduced efficiency in regards to the size of the SE of the estimated intervention effect [23, 40, 42].”
BackgroundLee, K. M., & Cheung, Y. B. (2024) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08572-1 · Cited by 12
“Alternatively, analyses may also be applied on the cluster period means to target the cluster-level response [6, 27].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialBorhan, S., Kennedy, C., Ioannidis, G., Παπαϊωάννου, Α., Adachi, J. D., & Thabane, L. (2020) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100539 · Cited by 9
Li, Y., Xiao, Q.-L., Li, M., Zhang, Y., Chen, M., Jiang, C.-H., Kang, S.-R., Zhang, Y., Huang, J. G., & Jiang, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.1039394 · Cited by 8
“Additionally, given the relatively small number of clusters, the Satterthwaite correction will be used in GLMM to maintain an appropriate Type I error (33).”
MethodOptimal study designs for cluster randomised trials: An overview of methods and results
Watson, S., Girling, A. J., & Hemming, K. (2023) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802231202379 · Cited by 9
“The standard errors for ̂𝛽 are underestimated when the number of clusters is small (see, e.g. Leyrat et al., 46 Kahan et al., 47 and Watson et al. 48 ).”
BackgroundZhao, Y., Liu, L., Ding, Y., & Chan, H. Y. L. (2022) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105434 · Cited by 9
Janowski, R., Green, O., Shenderovich, Y., Stern, D., Clements, L., Wamoyi, J., Wambura, M., Lachman, J. M., Meléndez‐Torres, G. J., Gardner, F. E. M., et al. (2023) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-15989-x · Cited by 10
Estimating an adjusted risk difference in a cluster randomized trial with individual-level analyses
Macedo, J. A. P., Giraudeau, B., & collaborators, E. (2024) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802241293783 · Cited by 10
“The parameters were selected from previous simulation studies on CRTs such as the studies of Leyrat et al. 11 and Thompson et al., 17 whose parameter values were based on CRT reviews.”
InfluentialChau, J. P. C., Lo, S. H. S., Choi, K. C., Lee, V. W. Y., Lui, G. C.-Y., Chan, K. M., & Lau, A. Y. L. (2020) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000022072 · Cited by 8
“The generalized estimating equations (GEE) analysis with small-sample correction for sandwich variance estimate, which can be used to account for the small number of clusters in cluster randomized trial,([37]) will be used for comparing the primary and secondary outcomes between the 2 groups.”
MethodMwenda, V., Makena, I., Ogweno, V., Obonyo, J., & Were, V. O. (2022) · JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · doi:10.2196/37359 · Cited by 10
“The GEE model was used with a small-sample correction, due to the small number of clusters [38].”
MethodWatson, S., Akinyemi, J. O., & Hemming, K. (2023) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9831 · Cited by 8
“uj,q+1 = { ujq − sjα∕q if Hj rejected ujq + sj(1 − α∗)∕q otherwise, (17)”
Leveraging baseline covariates to analyze small cluster‐randomized trials with a rare binary outcome
Zhu, Y., Mitra, N., Hemming, K., Harhay, M. O., & Li, F. (2023) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.202200135 · Cited by 8
“There remains considerable interest in improving finite-sample inference of the sandwich variance estimator for GEE analysis of small CRTs (Leyrat et al., 2018).”
BackgroundIsah, A. U. J., Ekwunife, O. I., Ejie, I. L., & Mandrik, O. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237112 · Cited by 8
“While cluster RCTs have been reported to have more potential to detect treatment effects in the most affected groups within the clusters [48,49], the risk of bias in such studies should be detailed, exploring the differences in outcomes reported.”
BackgroundLee, K. M., Ma, X., Yang, G. M., & Cheung, Y. B. (2022) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9394 · Cited by 9
Kristunas, C., Grayling, M. J., Gray, L. J., & Hemming, K. (2022) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-022-01588-8 · Cited by 7
Zhong, W., Lin, L., Gong, X., Chen, Z., Chen, Y., Yan, S., Zhou, Y., Zhang, X., Hu, H., Tong, L., et al. (2022) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004034 · Cited by 7
“Generalized estimating equation models with an exchangeable working correlation structure were conducted to account for the correlations of observations within clusters (hospitals) [26].”
MethodAnalysis of the RIMDAMAL trial – Authors' reply
Foy, B. D., Rao, S., Parikh, S., Slater, H., & Dabiré, R. K. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32139-7 · Cited by 7
Hemming, K., Thompson, J. A., Kristunas, C., Forbes, A., Watson, S., Bowden, R. A., McKenzie, J. E., & Kasza, J. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111838 · Cited by 11
Li, Y., Xiao, Q., Chen, M., Jiang, C., Kang, S.-R., Zhang, Y., Huang, J., Yang, Y., Li, M., & Jiang, H. (2024) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/54623 · Cited by 6
“Given the relatively small number of clusters, Satterthwaite correction was used in GLMM to maintain an appropriate type I error [35].”
MethodAustin, P. C. (2024) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.10260 · Cited by 6
“Second, we assumed that the regression coefficients followed a t -distribution with N clusters —2 degrees of freedom (2 was sub-tracted from N clusters because there were two cluster-level covariates) [10, 22].”
van Breukelen, G., & Candel, M. J. J. M. (2018) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyy061 · Cited by 6
Bellier, A., Kaladzé, N., Rabattu, P., Chaffanjon, P. C., & Cavalié, G. (2022) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2170 · Cited by 6
Restricted mean survival time to estimate an intervention effect in a cluster randomized trial
Vilain-Abraham, F. L., Tavernier, E., Dantan, É., Desmée, S., & Caille, A. (2023) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802231192960 · Cited by 5
“39 Several methodological reviews indicated that CRTs often randomized fewer than 40 clusters, 40–42 so a permutation test could be relevant to control the type I error rate when estimating the Δ RMST ( t ∗ ) with pseudo-values regression.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Leyrat, C., Morgan, K. E., Leurent, B., & Kahan, B. C.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Leyrat, Clémence
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-08-23
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 321-331
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2746185216
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Keywords
- small number of clusters, type I error rate, statistical power, small sample correction, mixed models, generalized estimating equations, intraclass correlation coefficient, sample size determination, continuous outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Models, Statistical, Cluster Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sample Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review