Cited by 162Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Infections and Studies

Fitness and virulence costs of Candida albicans FKS1 hot spot mutations associated with echinocandin resistance.

Open access
Ben-Ami, Ronen, Garcia-Effron, Guillermo, Lewis, Russell E., Gamarra, Soledad, Leventakos, Konstantinos, Perlin, David S., Kontoyiannis, Dimitrios P.·2011·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The identification of FKS1 mutations in Candida albicans associated with echinocandin resistance has raised concerns over the spread of drug-resistant strains. We studied the impact of fks1 mutations on C. albicans virulence and fitness. Compared with wild-type strains for FKS1, echinocandin-resistant C. albicans strains with homozygous fks1 hot-spot mutations had reduced maximum catalytic capacity of their glucan synthase complexes and thicker cell walls attributable to increased cell wall chitin content. The fks1 mutants with the highest chitin contents had reduced growth rates and impaired filamentation capacities. Fks1 mutants were hypovirulent in fly and mouse models of candidiasis, and this phenotype correlated with the cell wall chitin content. In addition, we observed reduced fitness of echinocandin-resistant C. albicans in competitive mixed infection models. We conclude that fks1 mutations that confer echinocandin resistance come at fitness and virulence costs, which may limit their epidemiological and clinical impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/jir351

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Echinocandin-resistant Candida isolates have impaired fitness as compared with isogenic FKS wild-type strains.

    “Echinocandin-resistant Candida isolates have impaired fitness as compared with isogenic FKS wild-type strains [43,44].”

    From Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis: A Narrative Review (2018) · cites this paper as [43]

  • The F659-DEL in C. glabrata confers resistance to all three echinocandins.

    “For example, the F659-DEL in C. glabrata confers resistance to all three echinocandins, whereas the F659S substitution at the same codon gives rise to anidulafungin and caspofungin resistance, whereas the micafungin MIC and in vivo efficacy in a murine animal model remains unchanged (23;25;27–30).”

    From Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem? (2014) · cites this paper as [29]

  • Mutations at these hot spots have been linked to impaired enzyme capacity, altered cell wall composition (reduced glucan and increased chitin content), increased cell wall thickness, and impaired filamentation properties.

    “Thus, mutations at these hot spots have been linked to a) impaired enzyme capacity, b) altered cell wall composition, i.e. reduced glucan and increased chit in content, c) increased cell wall thickness and d) impaired filamentation properties, which contribute to a lower growth rate in vitro and in vivo in drosophila and mouse models (31–33).”

    From Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem? (2014) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Some laboratories have noted an unexpected high number of C. glabrata and C. krusei isolates being categorised as non-susceptible using the CLSI method for testing caspofungin susceptibility and by using the Etest and Sensititre Yeast One system.

    “Despite this, some laboratories have noted an unexpected high number of C. glabrata and C. krusei isolates being categorised as non-susceptible using the CLSI method for testing caspofungin susceptibility and by using the Etest and Sensititre Yeast One system, which are standardised against the CLSI method (29;43–45).”

    From Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem? (2014) · cites this paper as [29]

  • Resistance mutations often come at a fitness cost.

    “Resistance mutations often come at a fitness cost and when that is the case, it may limit the spread of the organism due to competition from wild type isolates when therapy is discontinued.”

    From Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem? (2014) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ben-Ami, R., Garcia-Effron, G., Lewis, R. E., Gamarra, S., Leventakos, K., Perlin, D. S., & Kontoyiannis, D. P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2011-08-15
Volume
204
Issue
4
Pages
626-635
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2109132135
Cited by
162
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 016672, P30CA016672)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI069397, R01AI069397)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida albicans, FKS1 mutations, echinocandin resistance, drug resistance, fitness cost, glucan synthase, candidiasis, filamentation, competitive fitness, co-infection
MeSH terms
Animals, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Fungal Proteins, Macrophages, Mutation, Virulence, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Amino Acid Substitution, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Mice, Echinocandins, Genetic Fitness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review