Cited by 114Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Molecular basis of antifungal drug resistance in yeasts

Morio, Florent, Jensen, Rasmus Hare, Le Pape, Patrice, Arendrup, Maiken Cavling·2017·International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents

Abstract

Besides inherent differences in in vitro susceptibilities, clinically-relevant yeast species may acquire resistance upon exposure to most antifungal drugs used in the clinic. In recent years, major fundamental research studies have been conducted to improve our understanding of the molecular basis of antifungal resistance. This topic is of major interest as antifungal resistance in yeast is clearly evolving and is correlated with clinical failure. This minireview is an overview of the most recent findings about key molecular mechanisms evolving in human pathogenic yeasts, particularly Candida spp., in the context of antifungal drug resistance. Also included are the methods currently available for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing and for molecular detection of mutations associated with resistance. Finally, the genetic drivers of antifungal resistance are discussed in light of the spectra of multidrug resistance as observed in Candida glabrata.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.05.012

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Factors that promote the acquisition of resistance and treatment failure include the use of sub-therapeutic concentrations, drug sequestration in the biofilm matrix, and poor control of infections.

    “Besides the overall use and exposure to antifungals (often used in prophylactic measures), other factors that promote the acquisition of resistance and a treatment failure include the use of sub-therapeutic concentrations, drug sequestration in the biofilm matrix, and poor control of infections [67,68].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morio, F., Jensen, R. H., Le Pape, P., & Arendrup, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR)
  • Statens Serum Institut (DK)
Corresponding author
Morio, Florent
Venue
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
599-606
ISSN
0924-8579 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2731961272
Cited by
114
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
FWCI
8.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
antifungal resistance, Candida, Candida glabrata, multidrug resistance, molecular mechanisms of resistance, antifungal susceptibility testing, resistance mutations, clinical failure
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida, Genes, Fungal, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mutation, Drug Resistance, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review