Cited by 21Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

Echinocandin resistance among Candida isolates at an academic medical centre 2005–15: analysis of trends and outcomes

Open access
McCarty, Todd P, Lockhart, Shawn R, Moser, Stephen A, Whiddon, Jennifer, Zurko, Joanna, Pham, Cau D, Pappas, Peter G·2018·Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the frequency of micafungin resistance among clinically significant isolates of Candida stored at our institution from 2005 to 2015. Chart review of patients with resistant isolates then informed the clinical setting and outcomes associated with these infections. Methods: Clinical Candida isolates had been stored at -80°C in Brucella broth with 20% glycerol from 2005. Isolates were tested using broth microdilution to determine micafungin MICs. All Candida glabrata isolates and all isolates demonstrating decreased susceptibility to micafungin were screened for FKS mutations using a Luminex assay. Results: In total, 3876 Candida isolates were tested for micafungin resistance, including 832 C. glabrata isolates. Of those, 33 isolates from 31 patients were found to have either decreased susceptibility to micafungin and/or an FKS mutation. C. glabrata accounted for the majority of these isolates. While bloodstream infections were found to have a very high mortality rate, isolates from other sites were uncommonly associated with 30-day mortality. Overall resistance rates were very low. Conclusions: Echinocandin resistance in C. glabrata has been increasingly reported but rates at our institution remain very low. We hypothesize that a focus on antifungal stewardship may have led to these observations. Knowledge of local resistance patterns is key to appropriate empirical treatment strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jac/dky059

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One recent survey from a large academic medical center tested more than 800 C. glabrata isolates over a 10-year period and detected fewer than 3% echinocandin resistant isolates in any given year, and observed no trend towards emerging resistance.

    “For instance, one recent survey from a large academic medical center tested >800 C. glabrata isolates over a 10-year period and detected fewer than 3% echinocandin resistant isolates in any given year, and observed no trend towards emerging resistance.114”

    From Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis (2024) · cites this paper as [114]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts—Third Edition: Approved Standard M27-A3. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarty, T. P., Lockhart, S. R., Moser, S. A., Whiddon, J., Zurko, J., Pham, C. D., & Pappas, P. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Pappas, Peter G
Venue
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Published
2018-02-28
Volume
73
Issue
6
Pages
1677-1680
ISSN
  • 0305-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2091
OpenAlex
W2789609115
Cited by
21
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Astellas Pharma US
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Keywords
echinocandin resistance, micafungin, Candida glabrata, Candida, bloodstream candidiasis, 30-day mortality, antifungal stewardship, empirical antifungal therapy, resistance monitoring
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Caspofungin, Micafungin, Adult, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Female, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mutation, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Candida glabrata, Echinocandins, Candidemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review