Cited by 39Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareChildren's Rights and ParticipationEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Adolescent Psychological Development, Parenting Styles, and Pediatric Decision Making

Partridge, B. C.·2010·Journal of Medicine and Philosophy

Abstract

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child risks harm to adolescents insofar as it encourages not only poor decision making by adolescents but also parenting styles that will have an adverse impact on the development of mature decision-making capacities in them. The empirical psychological and neurophysiological data weigh against augmenting and expression of the rights of children. Indeed, the data suggest grounds for expanding parental authority, not limiting its scope. At the very least, any adequate appreciation of the moral claims regarding the authority of parents with respect to the decision-making capacity of adolescents needs to be set within an understanding of the psychological and neurophysiological facts regarding the development of adolescent decision-making capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jmp/jhq044

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adolescent brain still differs significantly from the adult brain, with frontal lobes essential for effective executive functions maturing later in children than in adults.

    “Data suggest that the adolescent brain still differs significantly from the adult brain, not least because the frontal lobes that are essential for effective executive functions mature later in children than they do in adults [17].”
  • An authoritative parenting style which includes direction-giving and limit-setting is positively correlated with an adolescent's developing capacity for autonomous decision-making.

    “An authoritative parenting style which includes direction-giving and limit-setting is positively correlated with an adolescent’s developing capacity for autonomous decision-making [17].”
  • Adolescents generally do not fully possess the capacity to appreciate the long-term consequences of their choices until the age of 21.

    “Adolescents generally do not fully possess the capacity to appreciate the long-term consequences of their choices until the age of 21 [17].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Partridge, B. C.
Corresponding author
Partridge, B. C.
Venue
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
Published
2010-09-24
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
518-525
ISSN
  • 0360-5310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5019
OpenAlex
W2095598483
Cited by
39
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
parenting styles, Convention on the Rights of the Child, parental authority, adolescent psychological development, pediatric decision-making, children's rights
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Authoritarianism, Decision Making, Humans, Parent-Child Relations, Philosophy, Medical, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Professional-Family Relations, United Nations, Global Health, Parenting, Personal Autonomy, Patient Rights, Dissent and Disputes, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review