Cited by 144Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningCancer Risks and FactorsMormonism, Religion, and History

Health Practices and Cancer Mortality Among Active California Mormons

Enstrom, J. E.·1989·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

Religiously active Mormons in California are a nonsmoking population with unusually low risk for cancer. This finding is based on the results of our 1979 questionnaire survey of life-style and the 8-year (1980-1987) follow-up of mortality among 5,231 Mormon high priests and 4,613 wives 25-99 years of age. Our study, which is the first prospective cohort study of Mormons, shows low standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for this population, relative to those for whites in the general population in the United States, which are defined as 100. The SMRs for males are 47 for all cancers, 52 for cardiovascular diseases, and 47 for all causes; the SMRs for females are 72 for all cancers, 64 for cardiovascular diseases, and 66 for all causes. For middle-aged high priests adhering to three health practices (never smoking cigarettes, engaging in regular physical activity, and getting proper sleep), the SMRs are 34 for all cancers, 14 for cardiovascular diseases, and 22 for all causes. These results have been largely replicated in an active Mormon-like subgroup (white nonsmokers attending church weekly) from a representative sample of residents of Alameda County, CA. Our findings confirm and expand on previous descriptive studies of Mormons and demonstrate how these results can be generalized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/81.23.1807

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 13 methodologically most rigorous studies, nine (69%) reported positive associations with R/S or positive effects of an R/S intervention (all involving Eastern meditation).

    “Of the 13 methodologically most rigorous studies, nine (69%) reported positive associations with R/S [457–461] or positive effects of an R/S intervention (all involving Eastern meditation) [462–465].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Enstrom, J. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Enstrom, J. E.
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1989-12-06
Volume
81
Issue
23
Pages
1807-1814
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2132371531
Cited by
144
References
20
Citations by year
2023: 41 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA-00748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Mormonism, Religion, and History
Keywords
cancer mortality, physical activity, sleep, cardiovascular mortality, standardized mortality ratio, religious adherence, lifestyle factors, high priest
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, California, Cardiovascular Diseases, Christianity, Humans, Life Style, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Smoking, Cohort Studies, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review