Cited by 781Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Research Studies

Chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) phase III randomized trial

Gridelli, C., Perrone, F., Gallo, C., Cigolari, S., Rossi, A., Piantedosi, F., Barbera, S., Ferrau, F. +15 more·2003·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine prolongs survival and improves quality of life in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Some studies have also suggested that gemcitabine is well tolerated and effective in such patients. We compared the effectiveness and toxicity of the combination of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine with those of each drug given alone in an open-label, randomized phase III trial in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Patients aged 70 years and older, enrolled between December 1997 and November 2000, were randomly assigned to receive intravenous vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2) of body surface area), gemcitabine (1200 mg/m(2)), or vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)). All treatments were delivered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary endpoint was survival. Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the Mantel-Haenszel test. Secondary endpoints were quality of life and toxicity. RESULTS: Of 698 patients available for intention-to-treat analysis, 233 were assigned to receive vinorelbine, 233 to gemcitabine, and 232 to vinorelbine plus gemcitabine. Compared with each single drug, the combination treatment did not improve survival. The hazard ratio of death for patients receiving the combination treatment was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 1.44) that of patients receiving vinorelbine and 1.06 (95% CI = 0.86 to 1.29) that of patients receiving gemcitabine. Although quality of life was similar across the three treatment arms, the combination treatment was more toxic than the two drugs given singly. CONCLUSION: The combination of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine is not more effective than single-agent vinorelbine or gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/95.5.362

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981;47:207-14.
  2. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non parametric estimation from incomplete obser- vation. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-81.
  3. Green M. Lung cancer: small cell and non-small cell. In: Johnson DH. American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting Summaries. Bal- timore (MD): Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins; 2001. p. 68-70.
  4. Lilenbaum RC, Herndon J, List M, Desch C, Watson D, Holland J, et al. Single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a CALGB randomized trial of efficacy, quality of life and cost-effectiveness [abstract 2]. Proc ASCO 2002;21:1a.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gridelli, C., Perrone, F., Gallo, C., Cigolari, S., Rossi, A., Piantedosi, F., Barbera, S., Ferrau, F., Piazza, E., Rosetti, F., Clerici, M., Bertetto, O., Robbiati, S. F., Frontini, L., Sacco, C., Castiglione, F., Favaretto, A., Novello, S., Migliorino, M. R., Gasparini, G., Galetta, D., Iaffaioli, R. V., & Gebbia, V.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati (IT)
  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
  • Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT)
Corresponding author
Gridelli, C.
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2003-03-05
Volume
95
Issue
5
Pages
362-372
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2137009016
Cited by
781
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 57
FWCI
50.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
advanced non-small cell lung cancer, elderly patients, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, combination chemotherapy, single-agent chemotherapy, survival, treatment toxicity, quality of life
MeSH terms
Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Deoxycytidine, Female, Humans, Italy, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Neoplasm Staging, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vinblastine, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review