Cited by 12Cancer survivorship and careDelphi Technique in ResearchClinical practice guidelines implementation

Personalized Cancer Follow-Up Care Pathways: A Delphi Consensus of Research Priorities

Open access
Leach, Corinne R, Alfano, Catherine M, Potts, Jessica, Gallicchio, Lisa, Yabroff, K Robin, Oeffinger, Kevin C, Hahn, Erin E, Shulman, Lawrence N +1 more·2020·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

Development of personalized, stratified follow-up care pathways where care intensity and setting vary with needs could improve cancer survivor outcomes and efficiency of health-care delivery. Advancing such an approach in the United States requires identification and prioritization of the most pressing research and data needed to create and implement personalized care pathway models. Cancer survivorship research and care experts (n = 39) participated in an in-person workshop on this topic in 2018. Using a modified Delphi technique—a structured, validated system for identifying consensus—an expert panel identified critical research questions related to operationalizing personalized, stratified follow-up care pathways for individuals diagnosed with cancer. Consensus for the top priority research questions was achieved iteratively through 3 rounds: item generation, item consolidation, and selection of the final list of priority research questions. From the 28 research questions that were generated, 11 research priority questions were identified. The questions were categorized into 4 priority themes: determining outcome measures for new care pathways, developing and evaluating new care pathways, incentivizing new care pathway delivery, and providing technology and infrastructure to support self-management. Existing data sources to begin answering questions were also identified. Although existing data sources, including cancer registry, electronic medical record, and health insurance claims data, can be enhanced to begin addressing some questions, additional research resources are needed to address these priority questions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djaa053

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The creation of new care pathway delivery methods and provision of novel technologies and infrastructures to support self-management have been flagged as research priorities in survivorship care.

    “The creation of new care pathway delivery methods and provision of novel technologies and infrastructures to support self-management have been flagged as research priorities in survivorship care.9,48”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leach, C. R., Alfano, C. M., Potts, J., Gallicchio, L., Yabroff, K. R., Oeffinger, K. C., Hahn, E. E., Shulman, L. N., & Hudson, S. V.
Affiliations
  • American Cancer Society (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Abramson Cancer Center (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Leach, Corinne R
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2020-04-25
Volume
112
Issue
12
Pages
1183-1189
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W3020286353
Cited by
12
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Cancer Society through the Intramural Research program
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
cancer survivorship, individualized care, stratified care, research priorities, cancer survivors, outcome measures, care pathway implementation, self-management, health data sources, healthcare delivery efficiency
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Survivorship, Adult, Aftercare, Aged, Continuity of Patient Care, Delivery of Health Care, Delphi Technique, Female, Health Priorities, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Patient-Centered Care, Critical Pathways, Consensus, Biomedical Research, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review