Cited by 127Cancer survivorship and careGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Personalized Risk-Stratified Cancer Follow-Up Care: Its Potential for Healthier Survivors, Happier Clinicians, and Lower Costs

Open access
Mayer, Deborah K, Alfano, Catherine M·2019·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

The growth in the number of cancer survivors in the face of projected health-care workforce shortages will challenge the US health-care system in delivering follow-up care. New methods of delivering follow-up care are needed that address the ongoing needs of survivors without overwhelming already overflowing oncology clinics or shuttling all follow-up patients to primary care providers. One potential solution, proposed for over a decade, lies in adopting a personalized approach to care in which survivors are triaged or risk-stratified to distinct care pathways based on the complexity of their needs and the types of providers their care requires. Although other approaches may emerge, we advocate for development, testing, and implementation of a risk-stratified approach as a means to address this problem. This commentary reviews what is needed to shift to a risk-stratified approach in delivering survivorship care in the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djy232

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementation challenges for comprehensive survivorship care include lack of health care professional awareness and training, prioritization of survivorship, organizational barriers such as dedicated time slots, multidisciplinary assessment, referral networks, and reimbursement issues.

    “This may be related to implementation challenges such as lack of health care professional awareness and training and prioritization of survivorship, organizational barriers including the need for dedicated time slots in clinics to allow for multidisciplinary assessment and management involving a range of subspecialty professionals and supportive care experts, articulation with appropriate referral”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [10]10. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Long-term survivorship care after cancer treatment: Proceedings of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  2. [21]21. de Moor JS, Mariotto AB, Parry C, et al. Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev . 2013;22(4):561-570.
  3. [43]43. Long-Term Survivorship Care after Cancer Treatment: Proceedings of a Workshop; 2018. Washington (DC): National Academies Press.
  4. [53]53. Alfano C, Mayer D, Bhatia S, et al. American Cancer Society - American Society of clinical oncology summit on implementing risk-stratified cancer follow-up care in the United States: key findings and recommendations. J Clin Oncol . 2018; Under review. |
  5. [57]57. Shanafelt TD, Noseworthy JH. Executive leadership and physician wellbeing: nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. Mayo Clin Proc . 2017;92(1):129-146.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayer, D. K., & Alfano, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • American Cancer Society (US)
Corresponding author
Mayer, Deborah K
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2019-02-06
Volume
111
Issue
5
Pages
442-448
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2913329666
Cited by
127
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIH
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
survivorship care, risk stratification, individualized care, triage, care pathways, health workforce shortage, cost reduction, clinician workload
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Survivorship, Aftercare, Cost Control, Delivery of Health Care, Health Personnel, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Triage, United States, Critical Pathways, Needs Assessment, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review