The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2002, Featuring Population-Based Trends in Cancer Treatment
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The American Cancer Society (ACS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) collaborate annually to provide information on cancer rates and trends in the United States. This year's report updates statistics on the 15 most common cancers in the five major racial/ethnic populations in the United States for 1992-2002 and features population-based trends in cancer treatment. METHODS: The NCI, the CDC, and the NAACCR provided information on cancer cases, and the CDC provided information on cancer deaths. Reported incidence and death rates were age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population, annual percent change in rates for fixed intervals was estimated by linear regression, and annual percent change in trends was estimated with joinpoint regression analysis. Population-based treatment data were derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registries, SEER-Medicare linked databases, and NCI Patterns of Care/Quality of Care studies. RESULTS: Among men, the incidence rates for all cancer sites combined were stable from 1995 through 2002. Among women, the incidence rates increased by 0.3% annually from 1987 through 2002. Death rates in men and women combined decreased by 1.1% annually from 1993 through 2002 for all cancer sites combined and also for many of the 15 most common cancers. Among women, lung cancer death rates increased from 1995 through 2002, but lung cancer incidence rates stabilized from 1998 through 2002. Although results of cancer treatment studies suggest that much of contemporary cancer treatment for selected cancers is consistent with evidence-based guidelines, they also point to geographic, racial, economic, and age-related disparities in cancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer death rates for all cancer sites combined and for many common cancers have declined at the same time as the dissemination of guideline-based treatment into the community has increased, although this progress is not shared equally across all racial and ethnic populations. Data from population-based cancer registries, supplemented by linkage with administrative databases, are an important resource for monitoring the quality of cancer treatment. Use of this cancer surveillance system, along with new developments in medical informatics and electronic medical records, may facilitate monitoring of the translation of basic science and clinical advances to cancer prevention, detection, and uniformly high quality of care in all areas and populations of the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating the quality of medical care
DONABEDIAN, A. (2005) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x · Cited by 6,102
Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Colon and Rectal Cancer
(1990) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450110090034 · Cited by 1,086
Potosky, A. L., Davis, W. W., Hoffman, R. M., Stanford, J. L., Stephenson, R. A., Penson, D. F., & Harlan, L. C. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh259 · Cited by 680
Self-citationAyanian, J. Z., Zaslavsky, A. M., Fuchs, C. S., Guadagnoli, E., Creech, C. M., Cress, R. D., O’Connor, L. C., West, D. W., Allen, M. E., Wolf, R. E., et al. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.06.178 · Cited by 308
Recent Trends in Lung Cancer Mortality in the United States
Jemal, A., Chu, K. C., & Tarone, R. E. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.4.277 · Cited by 167
Self-citationDeclining Lung Cancer Rates Among Young Men and Women in the United States: A Cohort Analysis
Devesa, S. S., Blot, W. J., & Fraumeni, J. F. (1989) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/81.20.1568 · Cited by 86
Cited by
Edwards, B. K., Ward, E., Kohler, B. A., Eheman, C., Zauber, A. G., Anderson, R. N., Jemal, A., Schymura, M. J., Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, I., Seeff, L. C., et al. (2010) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24760 · Cited by 2,002
Self-citationKohler, B. A., Sherman, R. L., Howlader, N., Jemal, A., Ryerson, A. B., Henry, K. A., Boscoe, F. P., Cronin, K. A., Lake, A., Noone, A.-M., et al. (2015) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djv048 · Cited by 915
Self-citationInternational epidemiology of prostate cancer: Geographical distribution and secular trends
Baade, P. D., Youlden, D. R., & Krnjacki, L. J. (2009) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.200700511 · Cited by 444
Cancer pain and its impact on diagnosis, survival and quality of life
Mantyh, P. W. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1914 · Cited by 441
Bodai, B. I., & Tuso, P. (2015) · The Permanente Journal · doi:10.7812/tpp/14-241 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, B. K., Brown, M. L., Wingo, P. A., Howe, H. L., Ward, E., Ries, L. A. G., Schrag, D., Jamison, P. M., Jemal, A., Wu, X. C., Friedman, C., Harlan, L., Warren, J., Anderson, R. N., & Pickle, L. W.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10-05
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1407-1427
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2110675408
- Cited by
- 952
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 48.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2002, Featuring Population-Based Trends in Cancer Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/dji289
- The paper
- Edwards, B. K., Brown, M. L., Wingo, P. A., Howe, H. L., Ward, E., Ries, L. A. G., Schrag, D., Jamison, P. M., Jemal, A., Wu, X. C., Friedman, C., Harlan, L., Warren, J., Anderson, R. N., & Pickle, L. W. (2005). Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2002, Featuring Population-Based Trends in Cancer Treatment. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.