The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-Analysis of Soy Intake and Breast Cancer Risk
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: High intake of soy foods has been proposed to contribute to the low breast cancer risk in Asian countries. However, results of epidemiologic studies of this association are highly variable, and experimental data suggest that soy constituents can be estrogenic and potentially risk enhancing. Thus, rigorous evaluation of available epidemiologic data is necessary before appropriate recommendations can be made, especially for women at high risk of breast cancer or those who have survived the disease. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 18 epidemiologic studies (12 case-control and six cohort or nested case-control) published from 1978 through 2004 that examined soy exposure and breast cancer risk. Pooled relative risk estimates were based on either the original soy exposure measure defined in each study or on an estimate of daily soy protein intake. RESULTS: Risk estimates, levels and measures of soy exposure, and control for confounding factors varied considerably across studies. In a pooled analysis, among all women, high soy intake was modestly associated with reduced breast cancer risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75 to 0.99); the association was not statistically significant among women in Asian countries (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.71 to 1.12). Among the 10 studies that stratified by menopausal status the inverse association between soy exposure and breast cancer risk was somewhat stronger in premenopausal women (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.85) than in postmenopausal women (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.98); however, eight studies did not provide menopause-specific results, six of which did not support an association. When exposure was analyzed by soy protein intake in grams per day, a statistically significant association with breast cancer risk was seen only among premenopausal women (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.92 to 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Soy intake may be associated with a small reduction in breast cancer risk. However, this result should be interpreted with caution due to potential exposure misclassification, confounding, and lack of a dose response. Given these caveats and results of some experimental studies that suggest adverse effects from soy constituents, recommendations for high-dose isoflavone supplementation to prevent breast cancer or prevent its recurrence are premature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Cancer Incidence in Five Continents
(1966) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85849-9 · Cited by 5,936
Publication and related bias in meta-analysis
Sterne, J. A. C., Gavaghan, D., & Egger, M. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0 · Cited by 2,282
QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1
GREENLAND, S. (1987) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036298 · Cited by 1,644
Van Patten, C. L., Olivotto, I. A., Chambers, G. K., Gelmon, K. A., Hislop, T. G., Templeton, E., Wattie, A., & Prior, J. C. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.20.6.1449 · Cited by 265
Grace, P. B., Taylor, J. I., Low, Y.-L., Luben, R. N., Mulligan, A. A., Botting, N. P., Dowsett, M., Welch, A. A., Khaw, K.-T., Wareham, N. J., et al. (2004) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.698.13.5 · Cited by 264
Soya foods and breast cancer risk: A prospective study in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan
Key, T. J., Sharp, G. B., Appleby, P. N., Beral, V, Goodman, M. T., Soda, M., & Mabuchi, K. (1999) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690837 · Cited by 262
Recent diet and breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study (USA)
Horn-Ross, P. L., Hoggatt, K. J., West, D. W., Krone, M. R., Stewart, S. L., Anton-Culver, H., Bernstein, L., Deapen, D., Peel, D., Pinder, R., et al. (2002) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1023/a:1015786030864 · Cited by 216
Mammographic densities in a one-year isoflavone intervention
Maskarinec, G., Williams, A. E., & Carlin, L. (2003) · European Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.1097/00008469-200304000-00011 · Cited by 87
Cited by
Del Rio, D., Rodriguez-Mateos, A., Spencer, J. P. E., Tognolini, M., Borges, G., & Crozier, A. (2013) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2012.4581 · Cited by 2,601
The pros and cons of phytoestrogens
Patisaul, H. B., & Jefferson, W. (2010) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.03.003 · Cited by 746
Minor components of pulses and their potential impact on human health
Campos-Vega, R., Loarca-Piña, G., & Oomah, B. D. (2010) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.004 · Cited by 530
Functional and edible uses of soy protein products
Singh, P., Kumar, R., Sabapathy, S. N., & Bawa, A. S. (2008) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2007.00025.x · Cited by 506
The potential health effects of dietary phytoestrogens
Rietjens, I. M. C. M., Louisse, J., & Beekmann, K. (2017) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.13622 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Trock, B. J., Hilakivi-Clarke, L., & Clarke, R.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-04-05
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 459-471
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2127737387
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 7.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-Analysis of Soy Intake and Breast Cancer Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djj102
- The paper
- Trock, B. J., Hilakivi-Clarke, L., & Clarke, R. (2006). Meta-Analysis of Soy Intake and Breast Cancer Risk. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.