Cited by 264Phytoestrogen effects and researchPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesEstrogen and related hormone effects

Phytoestrogen concentrations in serum and spot urine as biomarkers for dietary phytoestrogen intake and their relation to breast cancer risk in European prospective investigation of cancer and nutrition-norfolk

Grace, Philip B., Taylor, James I., Low, Yen-Ling, Luben, Robert N., Mulligan, Angela A., Botting, Nigel P., Dowsett, Mitch, Welch, Ailsa A. +4 more·2004·Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Abstract

Subjects of this study consisted of 333 women (aged 45–75 years) drawn from a large United Kingdom prospective study of diet and cancer, the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer and Nutrition-Norfolk study. Using newly developed gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry methods incorporating triply 13C-labeled standards, seven phytoestrogens (daidzein, genistein, glycitein, O-desmethylangolensin, equol, enterodiol, and enterolactone) were measured in 114 spot urines and 97 available serum samples from women who later developed breast cancer. Results were compared with those from 219 urines and 187 serum samples from healthy controls matched by age and date of recruitment. Dietary levels were low, but even so, mean serum levels of phytoestrogens were up to 600 times greater than postmenopausal estradiol levels. Phytoestrogen concentrations in spot urine (adjusted for urinary creatinine) correlated strongly with that in serum, with Pearson correlation coefficients > 0.8. There were significant relationships (P < 0.02) between both urinary and serum concentrations of isoflavones across increasing tertiles of dietary intakes. Urinary enterodiol and enterolactone and serum enterolactone were significantly correlated with dietary fiber intake (r = 0.13–0.29). Exposure to all isoflavones was associated with increased breast cancer risk, significantly so for equol and daidzein. For a doubling of levels, odds ratios increased by 20–45% [log2 odds ratio = 1.34 (1.06–1.70; P = 0.013) for urine equol, 1.46 (1.05–2.02; P = 0.024) for serum equol, and 1.22 (1.01–1.48; P = 0.044) for serum daidzein]. These estimates of risk are similar to those established for estrogens and androgens in postmenopausal breast cancer but need confirmation in larger studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1055-9965.698.13.5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grace et al reported a small but significant increase in risk of breast cancer associated with higher serum daidzein and serum and urinary equol levels, indicating 30-45% increased odds with a doubling of daidzein and equol levels.

    “Grace et al reported a small but significant increase in risk of breast cancer associated with higher serum daidzein and serum and urinary equol levels; this was expressed as a log2 odds ratio (associated with doubling of exposure) and as a different measure was not included in the forest plots [88]. Nonetheless, these findings indicated a 30-45% increased odds of breast cancer with a doubling of”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grace, P. B., Taylor, J. I., Low, Y.-L., Luben, R. N., Mulligan, A. A., Botting, N. P., Dowsett, M., Welch, A. A., Khaw, K.-T., Wareham, N. J., Day, N. E., & Bingham, S. A.
Affiliations
  • MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit (GB)
  • 2European Prospective Investigation of Cancer and Nutrition, Institute of Public Health and Strangeways Research Laboratories, Cambridge, United Kingdom;
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • Royal Marsden Hospital (GB)
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
698-708
ISSN
  • 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7755
OpenAlex
W2099241194
Cited by
264
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
14.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
phytoestrogens, breast cancer risk, isoflavones, daidzein, genistein, equol, enterolactone, enterodiol, O-desmethylangolensin, glycitein, dietary biomarkers, urinary biomarkers, serum biomarkers, dietary fiber, postmenopausal women
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Breast Neoplasms, Diet, United Kingdom, Humans, Isoflavones, Middle Aged, Probability, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Registries, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Tumor, Incidence, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Risk Assessment, Dietary Supplements, Plant Preparations, Phytoestrogens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review