The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is Virtual Reality Ready for Prime Time in the Medical Space? A Randomized Control Trial of Pediatric Virtual Reality for Acute Procedural Pain Management
Abstract
Objective: To conduct a randomized control trial to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of virtual reality (VR) compared with standard of care (SOC) for reducing pain, anxiety, and improving satisfaction associated with blood draw in children ages 10-21 years. Methods: In total, 143 triads (patients, their caregiver, and the phlebotomist) were recruited in outpatient phlebotomy at a pediatric hospital and randomized to receive either VR or SOC when undergoing routine blood draw. Patients and caregivers completed preprocedural and postprocedural standardized measures of pain, anxiety, and satisfaction, and phlebotomists reported about the patient's experience during the procedure. Results: Findings showed that VR significantly reduced acute procedural pain and anxiety compared with SOC. A significant interaction between patient-reported anxiety sensitivity and treatment condition indicated that patients undergoing routine blood draw benefit more from VR intervention when they are more fearful of physiological sensations related to anxiety. Patients and caregivers in the VR condition reported high levels of satisfaction with the procedure. Conclusion: VR is feasible, tolerated, and well-liked by patients, caregivers, and phlebotomists alike for routine blood draw. Given the immersive and engaging nature of the VR experience, VR has the capacity to act as a preventive intervention transforming the blood draw experience into a less distressing, potentially pain-free routine medical procedure, particularly for pediatric patients with high anxiety sensitivity. VR holds promise to reduce negative health outcomes for children and reduce distress in caregivers, while facilitating increased satisfaction and throughput in hectic outpatient phlebotomy clinics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers.
Ferguson, C. J. (2009) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0015808 · Cited by 3,467
The Faces Pain Scale – Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement
Hicks, C. L., von Baeyer, C. L., Spafford, P. A., van Korlaar, I., & Goodenough, B. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00314-1 · Cited by 2,063
Ossipov, M. H., Dussor, G. O., & Porreca, F. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci43766 · Cited by 1,159
The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: A systematic review
Malloy, K. M., & Milling, L. S. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001 · Cited by 653 · cited 1×
“…unique demand VR places on conscious attention, it is particularly well suited to reduce pain, and is one of the evidence-based strategies for pain management (see Mahrer & Gold, 2009; Malloy & Milling, 2010; Li, Monta~no, Chen, & Gold, 2011 for reviews of the efficacy of VR for pain reduction).”
BackgroundVirtual reality as an adjunctive pain control during burn wound care in adolescent patients
Hoffman, H. G., Doctor, J. N., Patterson, D. R., Carrougher, G. J., & Furness, T. A. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00275-4 · Cited by 651 · cited 4×
“VR and Nonvenipuncture Numerous studies have consistently demonstrated the efficacy of VR for decreasing pain, distress, and anxiety, and reducing time spent thinking about pain during burn management and wound care (Das et al., 2005; Hoffman et al., 2000; Hoffman et al., 2008).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialChildhood Anxiety Sensitivity Index
Silverman, W. K., Fleisig, W., Rabian, B., & Peterson, R. A. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Child Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp2002_7 · Cited by 634
Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., Lundblad, N., & Jin, M. (2008) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508400701793141 · Cited by 599
Virtual Reality and Pain Management: Current Trends and Future Directions
Li, A., Montaño, Z., Chen, V. J., & Gold, J. I. (2011) · Pain Management · doi:10.2217/pmt.10.15 · Cited by 536
Self-citationHandwerker, H. O., Iggo, A., & Zimmermann, M. (1975) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90099-8 · Cited by 422
Das, D. A., Grimmer, K. A., Sparnon, A. L., McRae, S. E., & Thomas, B. H. (2005) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/1471-2431-5-1 · Cited by 391
Cited by
Indovina, P., Barone, D., Gallo, L., Chirico, A., De Pietro, G., & Giordano, A. (2018) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000599 · Cited by 388
Virtual reality applications toward medical field
Javaid, M., & Haleem, A. (2020) · Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health · doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2019.12.010 · Cited by 269
Özalp Gerçeker, G., Ayar, D., Özdemir, E. Z., & Bektaş, M. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15173 · Cited by 179
Teh, J. J., Pascoe, D. J., Hafeji, S., Parchure, R., Koczoski, A., Rimmer, M. P., Khan, K. S., & Al Wattar, B. H. (2024) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03266-6 · Cited by 132
Gold, J. I., SooHoo, M., Laikin, A. M., Lane, A. S., & Klein, M. J. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22569 · Cited by 133
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gold, J. I., & Mahrer, N. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Psychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-10-19
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 266-275
- ISSN
- 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-735X
- OpenAlex
- W2765199705
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 17.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Virtual Reality Ready for Prime Time in the Medical Space? A Randomized Control Trial of Pediatric Virtual Reality for Acute Procedural Pain Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jpepsy/jsx129
- The paper
- Gold, J. I., & Mahrer, N. E. (2018). Is Virtual Reality Ready for Prime Time in the Medical Space? A Randomized Control Trial of Pediatric Virtual Reality for Acute Procedural Pain Management. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsx129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.