Cited by 99Astronomy and Astrophysical ResearchStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Impact of instrumental systematic errors on fine-structure constant measurements with quasar spectra

Open access
Whitmore, J. B., Murphy, M. T.·2014·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present a new ‘supercalibration’ technique for measuring systematic distortions in the wavelength scales of high-resolution spectrographs. By comparing spectra of ‘solar twin’ stars or asteroids with a reference laboratory solar spectrum, distortions in the standard thorium–argon calibration can be tracked with ∼10 m s−1 precision over the entire optical wavelength range on scales of both echelle orders (∼50–100 Å) and entire spectrographs arms (∼1000–3000 Å). Using archival spectra from the past 20 yr, we have probed the supercalibration history of the Very Large Telescope-Ultraviolet and Visible Echelle Spectrograph (VLT-UVES) and Keck-High Resolution Echelle Spectrograph (HIRES) spectrographs. We find that systematic errors in their wavelength scales are ubiquitous and substantial, with long-range distortions varying between typically ±200 m s−1 per 1000 Å. We apply a simple model of these distortions to simulated spectra that characterize the large UVES and HIRES quasar samples which previously indicated possible evidence for cosmological variations in the fine-structure constant, α. The spurious deviations in α produced by the model closely match important aspects of the VLT-UVES quasar results at all redshifts and partially explain the HIRES results, though not self-consistently at all redshifts. That is, the apparent ubiquity, size and general characteristics of the distortions are capable of significantly weakening the evidence for variations in α from quasar absorption lines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stu2420

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VLT/UVES and Keck/HIRES have, for this particular science case, an irreducible systematic of about 3 parts per million (Whitmore and Murphy 2015).

    “one shall keep in mind when comparing them that VLT/UVES and Keck/HIRES have, for this particular science case, an irreducible systematic of about 3 parts per million (Whitmore and Murphy 2015).”
  • It was concluded that the ThAr lamp calibration of the quasar wavelength scale was distorted with respect to that established from the Solar spectrum via reflection from asteroids, causing spurious velocity shifts and observed deviations in the determination of α_EM (Whitmore and Murphy 2015).

    “Murphy 2015).”
  • Concerns exist that some systematics in the archival data have not been fully modeled or corrected so far (Whitmore and Murphy 2015; Dumont and Webb 2017; Webb et al. 2025).

    “Note however that concerns do exist concerning the existence of some systematics in the data that have not been fully modeled or corrected so far (Whitmore and Murphy 2015;Dumont and Webb 2017;Webb et al. 2025).”
  • Keck/HIRES and VLT/UVES are now known to suffer from significant intra-order and long-range distortions (Whitmore and Murphy 2015).

    “Moreover, these two spectrographs are now known to suffer from significant intra-order and longrange distortions (Whitmore and Murphy 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dekker H., D'Odorico S., Kaufer A., Delabre B., Kotzlowski H., 2000, in Iye M., Moorwood A. F. M., eds, Proc. SPIE Conf. Ser. Vol. 4008, Optical and IR Telescope Instrumentation and Detectors. SPIE, Bellingham, p. 534
  2. Murphy M. T., Flambaum V. V., Webb J. K., Dzuba V., Prochaska J., Wolfe A. M., 2004, in Karshenboim S. G., Peik E., eds, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 648, Constraining Variations in the Fine-Structure Constant, Quark Masses and the Strong Interaction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 131
  3. Vogt S. et al., 1994, 2198, 362

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitmore, J. B., & Murphy, M. T.
Affiliations
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Whitmore, J. B.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2014-12-18
Volume
447
Issue
1
Pages
446-462
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2023087932
Cited by
99
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8
FWCI
16.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP110100866)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
fine-structure constant variation, quasar absorption lines, HiRes, quasar spectra

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review