Cited by 109Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

S 5: Probing the Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds potentials with the 6D map of the Orphan–Chenab stream

Open access
Koposov, Sergey E, Erkal, Denis, Li, Ting S, Da Costa, Gary S, Cullinane, Lara R, Ji, Alexander P, Kuehn, Kyler, Lewis, Geraint F +7 more·2023·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present a 6D map of the Orphan–Chenab (OC) stream by combining the data from Southern Stellar Stream Spectroscopic Survey (S5) and Gaia. We reconstruct the proper motion, radial velocity, distance, on-sky track, and stellar density along the stream with spline models. The stream has a total luminosity of MV = −8.2 and metallicity of [Fe/H] = −1.9, similar to classical Milky Way (MW) satellites like Draco. The stream shows drastic changes in its physical width varying from 200 pc to 1 kpc, but a constant line-of-sight velocity dispersion of 5 $\mathrm{km\, s^{-1}}$. Despite the large apparent variation in the stellar number density along the stream, the flow rate of stars along the stream is remarkably constant. We model the 6D stream track by a Lagrange-point stripping method with a flexible MW potential in the presence of a moving extended Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). This allows us to constrain the mass profile of the MW within the distance range 15.6 < r < 55.5 kpc, with the best measured enclosed mass of $(2.85\pm 0.1)\times 10^{11}\, \mathrm{\, M_\odot }$ within 32.4 kpc. Our stream measurements are highly sensitive to the LMC mass profile with the most precise measurement of its enclosed mass made at 32.8 kpc, $(7.02\pm 0.9)\times 10^{10}\, {\rm M}_\odot$. We also detect that the LMC dark matter halo extends to at least 53 kpc. The fitting of the OC stream allows us to constrain the past LMC trajectory and the degree of dynamical friction it experienced. We demonstrate that the stars in the OC stream show large energy and angular momentum spreads caused by LMC perturbation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stad551

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Cooper A. P., et al., 2022, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2208.08514 · arXiv
  2. Jin S., et al., 2022, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2212.03981 · DOI
  3. Koposov S., Bartunov O., 2006, in Gabriel C., Arviset C., Ponz D., Enrique S., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 351, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV. p. 735
  4. Mateu C., 2022, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2204.10326 · arXiv
  5. Sharp R., et al., 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series. p. 62690G (arXiv:astro-ph/0606137), doi:10.1117/12.671022 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koposov, S. E., Erkal, D., Li, T. S., Da Costa, G. S., Cullinane, L. R., Ji, A. P., Kuehn, K., Lewis, G. F., Pace, A. B., Shipp, N., Zucker, D. B., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Lilleengen, S., Martell, S. L., & (S5 Collaboration)
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University , Canberra, ACT 2611, Australia
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Lowell Observatory (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Centre of Excellence for All-Sky Astrophysics in Three Dimensions (ASTRO 3D) , Australia
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Koposov, Sergey E
  • Erkal, Denis
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2023-02-20
Volume
521
Issue
4
Pages
4936-4962
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W4321479452
Cited by
109
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 19
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • ARC (DP210100855)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2022-04794)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
Milky Way potential, Large Magellanic Cloud, stellar streams, dynamical friction, stream kinematics, Gaia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review