Cited by 101Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

Detection of the LMC-induced sloshing of the Galactic halo

Open access
Erkal, Denis, Deason, Alis J, Belokurov, Vasily, Xue, Xiang-Xiang, Koposov, Sergey E, Bird, Sarah A, Liu, Chao, Simion, Iulia T +3 more·2021·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

A wealth of recent studies have shown that the LMC is likely massive, with a halo mass >1011 M⊙. One consequence of having such a nearby and massive neighbour is that the inner Milky Way is expected to be accelerated with respect to our Galaxy’s outskirts (beyond ∼30 kpc). In this work, we compile a sample of ∼500 stars with radial velocities in the distant stellar halo, rGC > 50 kpc, to test this hypothesis. These stars span a large fraction of the sky and thus give a global view of the stellar halo. We find that stars in the Southern hemisphere are on average blueshifted, while stars in the North are redshifted, consistent with the expected, mostly downwards acceleration of the inner halo due to the LMC. We compare these results with simulations and find the signal is consistent with the infall of a 1.5 × 1011 M⊙ LMC. We cross-match our stellar sample with Gaia DR2 and find that the mean proper motions are not yet precise enough to discern the LMC’s effect. Our results show that the Milky Way is significantly out of equilibrium and that the LMC has a substantial effect on our Galaxy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stab1828

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Large Magellanic Cloud (MLMC approximately 1-2 × 10^11 solar masses) creates a dynamical-friction wake and induces a reflex motion of the Milky Way of order tens of km/s (Conroy et al., 2021; Erkal et al., 2021).

    “The LMC ( M LMC ≈ 1-2 × 10 11 M ⊙ ) creates a dynamical-friction wake and induces a reflex motion of the MW of order tens of kms -1 (Conroy et al., 2021; Erkal et al., 2021).”

    From The rotation curve of the Milky Way: State of the art, the Keplerian decline debate, and implications for dark matter (2026) · cites this paper as Erkal et al. (2021)

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dalton G. et al., 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engi- neers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9147, Proc. SPIE, p. 91470L
  2. Garavito-Camargo N., Besla G., Laporte C. F. P., Price-Whelan A. M., Cun- ningham E. C., Johnston K. V., Weinberg M. D., Gomez F. A., 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2010.00816 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erkal, D., Deason, A. J., Belokurov, V., Xue, X.-X., Koposov, S. E., Bird, S. A., Liu, C., Simion, I. T., Yang, C., Zhang, L., & Zhao, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Erkal, Denis
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2021-07-01
Volume
506
Issue
2
Pages
2677-2684
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W3094736889
Cited by
101
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/P000541/1, ST/T000244/1)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11988101, 11873052, 11873057, 11890694, 11773033)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFA0405500)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
Large Magellanic Cloud, Galactic halo, radial velocity, Milky Way dynamics, halo mass, halo kinematics, Gaia DR2, proper motions, galaxy mergers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review