Cited by 92DNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesGene expression and cancer classification

Utilising the left-helical conformation of l-DNA for analysing different marker types on a single universal microarray platform

Open access
Hauser, Nicole C., Martinez, Rafael, Jacob, Anette, Rupp, Steffen, Hoheisel, Jörg D., Matysiak, Stefan·2006·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

L-DNA is the perfect mirror-image form of the naturally occurring d-conformation of DNA. Therefore, L-DNA duplexes have the same physical characteristics in terms of solubility, duplex stability and selectivity as D-DNA but form a left-helical double-helix. Because of its chiral difference, L-DNA does not bind to its naturally occurring D-DNA counterpart, however. We analysed some of the properties that are typical for L-DNA. For all the differences, L-DNA is chemically compatible with the D-form of DNA, so that chimeric molecules can be synthesized. We take advantage of the characteristics of L-DNA toward the establishment of a universal microarray that permits the analysis of different kinds of molecular diagnostic information in a single experiment on a single platform, in various combinations. Typical results for the measurement of transcript level variations, genotypic differences and DNA-protein interactions are presented. However, on the basis of the characteristic features of L-DNA, also other applications of this molecule type are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkl671

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • l-DNA is completely nuclease resistant and has identical kinetic and thermodynamic properties as its native counterpart, d-DNA.

    “l-DNA is an ideal oligonucleotide analog because it is completely nuclease resistant, yet has identical kinetic and thermodynamic properties as its native counterpart, d-DNA [26].”

    From l-DNA-Based Catalytic Hairpin Assembly Circuit (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    In Results > Biochemical aspects (page unavailable), L-DNA resisted all four nucleases tested, but those experiments do not establish resistance to every nuclease. Results > Biophysical parameters reports insignificant differences in melting behaviour between pure L- and D-DNA duplexes, supporting comparable duplex stability; the passages do not establish identical kinetic properties. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hauser, N. C., Martinez, R., Jacob, A., Rupp, S., Hoheisel, J. D., & Matysiak, S.
Affiliations
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology (DE)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Hauser, Nicole C.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2006-09-20
Volume
34
Issue
18
Pages
5101-5111
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2144502935
Cited by
92
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
L-DNA, chimeric DNA, DNA microarrays, protein-DNA interactions, genotyping, molecular diagnosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Deoxyribonucleases, DNA, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, DNA-Binding Proteins, Genetic Markers, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Stereoisomerism, Oligonucleotide Probes, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Gene Expression Profiling, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review