The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural bias in T4 RNA ligase-mediated 3′-adapter ligation
Open accessAbstract
T4 RNA ligases are commonly used to attach adapters to RNAs, but large differences in ligation efficiency make detection and quantitation problematic. We developed a ligation selection strategy using random RNAs in combination with high-throughput sequencing to gain insight into the differences in efficiency of ligating pre-adenylated DNA adapters to RNA 3'-ends. After analyzing biases in RNA sequence, secondary structure and RNA-adapter cofold structure, we conclude that T4 RNA ligases do not show significant primary sequence preference in RNA substrates, but are biased against structural features within RNAs and adapters. Specifically, RNAs with less than three unstructured nucleotides at the 3'-end and RNAs that are predicted to cofold with an adapter in unfavorable structures are likely to be poorly ligated. The effect of RNA-adapter cofold structures on ligation is supported by experiments where the ligation efficiency of specific miRNAs was changed by designing adapters to alter cofold structure. In addition, we show that using adapters with randomized regions results in higher ligation efficiency and reduced ligation bias. We propose that using randomized adapters may improve RNA representation in experiments that include a 3'-adapter ligation step.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mathews, D. H., Sabina, J., Zuker, M., & Turner, D. H. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700 · Cited by 3,795
Diversity of microRNAs in human and chimpanzee brain
Berezikov, E., Thuemmler, F., van Laake, L. W., Kondova, I., Bontrop, R., Cuppen, E., & Plasterk, R. H. A. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1914 · Cited by 502
Cited by
Moore, M. J., Zhang, C., Gantman, E. C., Mele, A., Darnell, J. C., & Darnell, R. B. (2014) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.012 · Cited by 251
Structural Basis for Target-Directed MicroRNA Degradation
Sheu-Gruttadauria, J., Pawlica, P., Klum, S. M., Wang, S., Yario, T. A., Schirle Oakdale, N. T., Steitz, J. A., & MacRae, I. J. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.019 · Cited by 230
Hébert, S. S., Wang, W.-X., Zhu, Q., & Nelson, P. T. (2013) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-122350 · Cited by 125
Sources and Functions of Extracellular Small RNAs in Human Circulation
Fritz, J. V., Heintz-Buschart, A., Ghosal, A., Wampach, L., Etheridge, A., Galas, D., & Wilmes, P. (2016) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-071715-050711 · Cited by 121
Baran-Gale, J., Kurtz, C. L., Erdos, M. R., Sison, C., Young, A., Fannin, E. E., Chines, P. S., & Sethupathy, P. (2015) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00352 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhuang, F., Fuchs, R. T., Sun, Z., Zheng, Y., & Robb, G. B.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-01-11
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e54-e54
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2126184583
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural bias in T4 RNA ligase-mediated 3′-adapter ligation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkr1263
- The paper
- Zhuang, F., Fuchs, R. T., Sun, Z., Zheng, Y., & Robb, G. B. (2012). Structural bias in T4 RNA ligase-mediated 3′-adapter ligation. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.