Cited by 1,524Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

CellMarker: a manually curated resource of cell markers in human and mouse

Open access
Zhang, Xinxin, Lan, Yujia, Xu, Jinyuan, Quan, Fei, Zhao, Erjie, Deng, Chunyu, Luo, Tao, Xu, Liwen +9 more·2019·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

One of the most fundamental questions in biology is what types of cells form different tissues and organs in a functionally coordinated fashion. Larger-scale single-cell sequencing and biology experiment studies are now rapidly opening up new ways to track this question by revealing substantial cell markers for distinguishing different cell types in tissues. Here, we developed the CellMarker database (http://biocc.hrbmu.edu.cn/CellMarker/ or http://bio-bigdata.hrbmu.edu.cn/CellMarker/), aiming to provide a comprehensive and accurate resource of cell markers for various cell types in tissues of human and mouse. By manually curating over 100 000 published papers, 4124 entries including the cell marker information, tissue type, cell type, cancer information and source, were recorded. At last, 13 605 cell markers of 467 cell types in 158 human tissues/sub-tissues and 9148 cell makers of 389 cell types in 81 mouse tissues/sub-tissues were collected and deposited in CellMarker. CellMarker provides a user-friendly interface for browsing, searching and downloading markers of diverse cell types of different tissues. Furthermore, a summarized marker prevalence in each cell type is graphically and intuitively presented through a vivid statistical graph. We believe that CellMarker is a comprehensive and valuable resource for cell researches in precisely identifying and characterizing cells, especially at the single-cell level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gky900

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Lan, Y., Xu, J., Quan, F., Zhao, E., Deng, C., Luo, T., Xu, L., Liao, G., Yan, M., Ping, Y., Li, F., Shi, A., Bai, J., Zhao, T., Li, X., & Xiao, Y.
Affiliations
Harbin Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhao, Tingting
  • Li, Xia
  • Xiao, Yun
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2018-10-05
Volume
47
Issue
D1
Pages
D721-D728
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2895456557
Cited by
1,524
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 129 · 2025: 224 · 2024: 303 · 2023: 343 · 2022: 244 · 2021: 181 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 25
FWCI
24.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2014AA021102)
  • National Program on Key Basic Research (2014CB910504)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61473106, 61573122, 31601076)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M600260)
  • Harbin Medical University (WLD-QN1407)
  • Construction of Higher Education in Heilongjiang Province (UNPYSCT-2016049)
  • Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Foundation (LBHZ16098)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
cell markers, cell type annotation, human tissue, mouse tissues, manual curation, single-cell sequencing
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Software, Sequence Analysis, Databases, Genetic, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review