Cited by 93Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Flexible comparison of batch correction methods for single-cell RNA-seq using BatchBench

Open access
Chazarra-Gil, Ruben, van Dongen, Stijn, Kiselev, Vladimir Yu, Hemberg, Martin·2021·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

As the cost of single-cell RNA-seq experiments has decreased, an increasing number of datasets are now available. Combining newly generated and publicly accessible datasets is challenging due to non-biological signals, commonly known as batch effects. Although there are several computational methods available that can remove batch effects, evaluating which method performs best is not straightforward. Here, we present BatchBench (https://github.com/cellgeni/batchbench), a modular and flexible pipeline for comparing batch correction methods for single-cell RNA-seq data. We apply BatchBench to eight methods, highlighting their methodological differences and assess their performance and computational requirements through a compendium of well-studied datasets. This systematic comparison guides users in the choice of batch correction tool, and the pipeline makes it easy to evaluate other datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkab004

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Linear-embedding models such as canonical correlation analysis and Harmony perform well for batch correction on simpler integration tasks with distinct batch structures.

    “Linear-embedding models such as canonical correlation analysis36 and Harmony37 were shown to perform well for batch correction on simpler integration tasks with distinct batch structures38,39.”

    From Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chazarra-Gil, R., van Dongen, S., Kiselev, V. Y., & Hemberg, M.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK
Corresponding author
  • Chazarra-Gil, Ruben
  • Kiselev, Vladimir Yu
  • Hemberg, Martin
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2021-02-01
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
e42-e42
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W3126492421
Cited by
93
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Polytechnic University of Valencia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
batch effect correction, batch effects, single-cell RNA sequencing, benchmarking, method comparison, computational pipeline
MeSH terms
RNA-Seq, Animals, Humans, Software, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review