Cited by 180MicroRNA in disease regulationCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 91 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Downregulation of Pdcd4 by mir-21 facilitates glioblastoma proliferation in vivo

Open access

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, noncoding RNAs that play a critical role in developmental and physiological processes and are implicated in the pathogenesis of several human diseases, including cancer. They function by regulating target gene expression post-transcriptionally. In this study, we examined the role of oncogenic mir-21 in the pathogenesis of glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of primary brain tumor. We have previously reported that mir-21 is expressed at higher levels in primary glioblastoma-tissue and glioblastoma-derived cell lines than in normal brain tissue. We demonstrate that downregulation of mir-21 in glioblastoma-derived cell lines results in increased expression of its target, programmed cell death 4 (Pdcd4), a known tumor-suppressor gene. In addition, our data indicate that either downregulation of mir-21 or overexpression of its target, Pdcd4, in glioblastoma-derived cell lines leads to decreased proliferation, increased apoptosis, and decreased colony formation in soft agar. Using a glioblastoma xenograft model in immune-deficient nude mice, we observe that glioblastoma-derived cell lines in which mir-21 levels are downregulated or Pdcd4 is over-expressed exhibit decreased tumor formation and growth. Significantly, tumors grow when the glioblastoma-derived cell lines are transfected with anti-mir-21 and siRNA to Pdcd4, confirming that the tumor growth is specifically regulated by Pdcd4. These critical in vivo findings demonstrate an important functional linkage between mir-21 and Pdcd4 and further elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which the known high level of mir-21 expression in glioblastoma can attribute to tumorigenesis--namely, inhibition of Pdcd4 and its tumor-suppressive functions.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In glioblastoma-derived cell lines and primary tumors, high miR-21 is inversely associated with the tumor suppressor Pdcd4; inhibiting miR-21 or overexpressing Pdcd4 reduces proliferation, increases apoptosis, and suppresses anchorage-independent growth. In nude-mouse xenografts, anti-miR-21 or Pdcd4 overexpression reduces tumor growth, and siRNA against Pdcd4 reverses the anti-miR-21 effect, supporting Pdcd4 as a key mediator.

Key findings

  • miR-21 was elevated in all 7 glioblastoma-derived cell lines and all 13 glioblastoma tumors examined, while Pdcd4 protein was undetectable in primary glioblastoma tissues and cell lines compared with normal brain. Anti-miR-21 transfection increased Pdcd4 protein at 24, 48, and 72 hours.
  • Anti-miR-21 treatment decreased proliferation, increased TUNEL-positive apoptosis, increased G0/G1 and decreased S-phase fraction, and reduced soft-agar colony formation by 65% (10 mM anti-miR-21) and 75% (30 mM anti-miR-21) in 3 independent experiments; U251 and U87 cells treated with anti-miR-21 formed 70% and 60% fewer colonies, respectively.
  • Pdcd4 overexpression increased apoptosis and decreased colony formation. Anti-miR-21 plus Pdcd4 siRNA restored colony numbers similar to untreated controls; cells treated with anti-miR-21 and Pdcd4 siRNA produced 85% of the colonies seen with anti-miR-21 alone.
  • In xenografts, anti-miR-21 reduced tumor growth by 30% at day 30 (P = .01); Pdcd4 overexpression produced a 90% decrease (P = .001) or complete lack of tumor growth. In 5 independent xenograft experiments, only 5 of 24 U251 GFP+Pdcd4 and 6 of 24 U87 GFP+Pdcd4 mice developed detectable tumors by day 30, and these were on average 90% smaller. Anti-miR-21 plus Pdcd4 siRNA tumors grew comparably to controls, reaching 1.5 cm³ by day 30. Pdcd4 was undetectable in 4 individual tumors arising from Pdcd4-overexpressing lines.

Methods

  • Glioblastoma-derived cell lines SNB19, U251, U87, and SF767 were used with primary glioblastoma and normal brain samples. Stable Pdcd4-expressing polyclonal and monoclonal cultures were derived; transient transfections used anti-miR-21, negative/toxicity control, and Pdcd4 siRNA. Assays included Northern blot, Western blot, stem-loop real-time PCR, proliferation counts, TUNEL apoptosis, cell-cycle flow cytometry, and soft-agar colony formation.
  • Xenografts used female 4–6-week-old Nude-Foxn1 nu mice injected subcutaneously in the flank with 5 × 10⁶ cells. Tumor size was measured in 3 dimensions, volume calculated as ellipsoid, and tumors imaged with the IVIS 200 Xenogen system. Data were from 5 independent xenograft experiments (total n = 24 animals per condition); statistics used unpaired two-tailed Student t test with P < .05, and experiments were performed at least 3 times.

Limitations

  • Stated: xenografts were not of sufficient size to analyze DNA, RNA, and protein, so only Pdcd4 protein was measured. The authors note that rare cells may escape Pdcd4 inhibition through altered transgene integration or epigenetic inactivation, and small tumors from anti-miR-21-treated cells may arise from untransfected cells. They also note miR-21 can target several genes; anti-miR-21 plus Pdcd4 siRNA still produced 85% of colonies compared with anti-miR-21 alone, suggesting additional miR-21 targets.
  • Evident: the in vivo work uses subcutaneous xenografts in immune-deficient nude mice rather than orthotopic or patient-derived models, and no survival or clinical outcome data are reported. Transfection efficiency was 80%–90%, leaving potential untransfected cells in treated populations.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/neuonc/nor033

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 91 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 73 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 15
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 19
27 of 27
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The effect of mir-21 regulation of Pdcd4 on specific biological activities (apoptosis, proliferation, anchorage-independent growth, or in vivo growth of glioblastoma xenografts) has not been studied.

    “However, the effect of mir-21 regulation of Pdcd4 on specific biological activities of pathologic potential (eg, apoptosis, proliferation, anchorage-independent growth, or more significantly, in vivo growth of glioblastoma xenografts) has, to our knowledge, not been studied.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Anchorage-independent growth in soft agar correlates closely with tumorigenicity of transformed cells.

    “Anchorage-independent growth assayed in soft agar is a characteristic of transformed cells that correlates closely with their tumorigenicity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The effect of mir-21/Pdcd4 regulation on specific biological activities, such as apoptosis, proliferation, or anchorage-independent growth, has not been studied.

    “Although mir-21 has been shown to regulate Pdcd4 in glioblastoma, 18 the effect of mir-21/Pdcd4 regulation on specific biological activities, such as apoptosis, proliferation, or anchorageindependent growth, has not been studied.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The effect on in vivo growth of glioblastoma cells of mir-21/Pdcd4 has not been explored.

    “More significantly, the effect on in vivo growth of glioblastoma cells of mir-21/Pdcd4 has not been explored.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Colony-count rescue is described in opposite directions

    Minor

    The results say that adding siRNA to Pdcd4 increases colony formation relative to anti-mir-21 alone. The discussion instead says the combined treatment produces 85% as many colonies as anti-mir-21 alone, which would be a decrease.

  • TUNEL results are assigned to the cell-cycle figure panel

    Minor

    The results cite Fig. 3B for TUNEL staining, but the figure caption identifies panel B as cell-cycle analysis; it identifies panel C as TUNEL staining.

  • Figure 1B identifies different Western blot targets

    Minor

    The caption calls panel B a Western blot of mir-21, then says the blot quantifies Pdcd4 protein using an anti-Pdcd4 antibody.

3 of 3

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

  • Cites a retracted work: 10.1002/jcb.20982

    Info

    The cited work was retracted on 2025-04-28 (notice 10.1002/jcb.70023), not before this paper was published (2011-06-01).

    Cited work 10.1002/jcb.20982 · retracted 2025-04-28 · notice 10.1002/jcb.70023 · this paper published 2011-06-01

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 55 references

2 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gao, 2007, Oncology reports, 17, 123
  2. 2007, 133, 647
  3. 2008, Cell research, 18, 350, 10.1038/cr.2008.24 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–180 of 180

Metadata

Authors
Gaur, A. B., Holbeck, S. L., Colburn, N. H., & Israel, M. A.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Gaur, A. B.
Venue
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
580-590
ISSN
  • 1522-8517 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-5866
OpenAlex
W2097617161
Cited by
180
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuro-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
miR-21, PDCD4, glioblastoma, microRNA, tumor suppressor, cell proliferation, apoptosis, colony formation, xenograft tumor growth, carcinogenesis, post-transcriptional regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Neoplasms, Cell Adhesion, Cell Movement, Female, Glioblastoma, Humans, Mice, Nude, RNA, Messenger, Blotting, Northern, Blotting, Western, RNA-Binding Proteins, Apoptosis, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, MicroRNAs, Cell Proliferation, Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-22, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-22 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review