The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maintenance of primary tumor phenotype and genotype in glioblastoma stem cells
Open accessAbstract
The clinicopathological heterogeneity of glioblastoma (GBM) and the various genetic and phenotypic subtypes in GBM stem cells (GSCs) are well described. However, the relationship between GSCs and the corresponding primary tumor from which they were isolated is poorly understood. We have established GSC-enriched neurosphere cultures from 15 newly diagnosed GBM specimens and examined the relationship between the histopathological and genomic features of GSC-derived orthotopic xenografts and those of the respective patient tumors. GSC-initiated xenografts recapitulate the distinctive cytological hallmarks and diverse histological variants associated with the corresponding patient GBM, including giant cell and gemistocytic GBM, and primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET)-like components. This indicates that GSCs generate tumors that preserve patient-specific disease phenotypes. The majority of GSC-derived intracerebral xenografts (11 of 15) demonstrated a highly invasive behavior crossing the midline, whereas the remainder formed discrete nodular and vascular masses. In some cases, GSC invasiveness correlated with preoperative MRI, but not with the status of PI3-kinase/Akt pathways or O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase expression. Genome-wide screening by array comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that GSCs harbor unique genetic copy number aberrations. GSCs acquiring amplifications of the myc family genes represent only a minority of tumor cells within the original patient tumors. Thus, GSCs are a genetically distinct subpopulation of neoplastic cells within a GBM. These studies highlight the value of GSCs for preclinical modeling of clinically relevant, patient-specific GBM and, thus, pave the way for testing novel anti-GSC/GBM agents for personalized therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma
Stupp, R., Mason, W. P., van den Bent, M. J., Weller, M., Fisher, B., Taphoorn, M. J. B., Belanger, K., Brandes, A. A., Marosi, C., Bogdahn, U., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043330 · Cited by 21,807
Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07385 · Cited by 7,735
Verhaak, R. G. W., Hoadley, K. A., Purdom, E., Wang, V., Qi, Y., Wilkerson, M. D., Miller, C. R., Ding, L., Golub, T., Mesirov, J. P., et al. (2010) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020 · Cited by 7,575
p53 and Pten control neural and glioma stem/progenitor cell renewal and differentiation
Zheng, H., Ying, H., Yan, H., Kimmelman, A. C., Hiller, D. J., Chen, A.-J., Perry, S. R., Tonon, G., Chu, G. C., Ding, Z., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07443 · Cited by 767
Pattern of retinoblastoma pathway inactivation dictates response to CDK4/6 inhibition in GBM
Wiedemeyer, W. R., Dunn, I. F., Quayle, S. N., Zhang, J., Chheda, M. G., Dunn, G. P., Zhuang, L., Rosenbluh, J., Chen, S., Xiao, Y., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1001613107 · Cited by 223
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Wen, 2008, New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 492, 10.1056/NEJMra0708126 · DOI · Paper page
- Stupp, 2009, The lancet oncology, 10, 459, 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Miller, 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 131, 397, 10.5858/2007-131-397-G · doi:10.5858/2007-131-397-g
- Reya, 2001, Nature; Physical Science (London), 414, 105, 10.1038/35102167 · DOI · Paper page
- Singh, 2004, Nature; Physical Science (London), 432, 396, 10.1038/nature03128 · DOI · Paper page
- Galli, 2004, Cancer Research, 64, 7011, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1364 · DOI · Paper page
- Beier, 2007, Cancer Research, 67, 4010, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4180 · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, 2010, Cancer cell, 17, 362, 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.049 · DOI · Paper page
- Joo, 2008, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 88, 808, 10.1038/labinvest.2008.57 · DOI · Paper page
- Bao, 2006, Nature; Physical Science (London), 444, 756, 10.1038/nature05236 · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, 2006, Molecular cancer [electronic resource], 5, 67, 10.1186/1476-4598-5-67 · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, Cancer Research, 69, 3472, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3886 · DOI · Paper page
- Decarvalho, 2010, Stem Cells, 28, 181, 10.1002/stem.264 · DOI
- 2010, Neuro-Oncology, 12, 1220, 10.1093/neuonc/noq102 · DOI
- Gunther, 2008, Oncogene, 27, 2897, 10.1038/sj.onc.1210949 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, Molecular Cancer Research, 6, 21, 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-0280 · DOI · Paper page
- Lee, 2006, Cancer cell, 9, 391, 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.030 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, Cancer Research, 70, 2030, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1707 · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, Clinical Cancer Research, 15, 6541, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0695 · DOI · Paper page
- Esteller, 1999, Cancer Research, 59, 793
- Gabeau-Lacet, 2009, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology, 68, 1155, 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181ba3952 · DOI
- Mohapatra, 2006, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 8, 268, 10.2353/jmoldx.2006.050109 · DOI
- Perry, 2009, Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 19, 81, 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00167.x · DOI · Paper page
- Molina, 2010, Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 12, 453, 10.1593/neo.10126 · DOI · Paper page
- Hegi, 2005, New England Journal of Medicine, 352, 997, 10.1056/NEJMoa043331 · DOI · Paper page
- Cho, 2008, Current opinion in genetics & development, 18, 48, 10.1016/j.gde.2008.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
- Shackleton, 2009, Cell, 138, 822, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.017 · DOI · Paper page
- Picard-Riera, 2004, Journal of neuroscience research, 76, 223, 10.1002/jnr.20040 · DOI · Paper page
- Candolfi, 2007, Journal of neuro-oncology, 85, 133, 10.1007/s11060-007-9400-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, 1, 40, 10.4103/2152-7806.68337 · doi:10.4103/2152-7806.68337
- Aghi, 2005, Clinical Cancer Research, 11, 8600, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0713 · DOI
- Pandita, 2004, Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 39, 29, 10.1002/gcc.10300 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, Neuro-Oncology, 7, 164, 10.1215/S1152851704000821 · DOI · Paper page
- Rao, 2010, Journal of neuro-oncology, 96, 169, 10.1007/s11060-009-9959-4 · DOI
- Wang, 2008, 3, e3769, 10.1371/journal.pone.0003769 · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, Cancer Research, 69, 9211, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1622 · DOI · Paper page
- Piccirillo, 2009, Oncogene, 28, 1807, 10.1038/onc.2009.27 · DOI · Paper page
- Barabe, 2007, Science, 316, 600, 10.1126/science.1139851 · DOI · Paper page
- Park, 2010, Journal of Clinical Investigation, 120, 636, 10.1172/JCI40724 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, 2011, Nature; Physical Science (London), 469, 356, 10.1038/nature09650 · DOI · Paper page
- Notta, 2011, Nature; Physical Science (London), 469, 362, 10.1038/nature09733 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma
Patel, A. P., Tirosh, I., Trombetta, J. J., Shalek, A. K., Gillespie, S. M., Wakimoto, H., Cahill, D. P., Nahed, B. V., Curry, W. T., Martuza, R. L., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1254257 · Cited by 5,063
Self-citationAn Integrative Model of Cellular States, Plasticity, and Genetics for Glioblastoma
Neftel, C., Laffy, J., Filbin, M. G., Hara, T., Shore, M. E., Rahme, G. J., Richman, A. R., Silverbush, D., Shaw, M. L., Hebert, C. M., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.024 · Cited by 2,873
Self-citationInsulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas
Flavahan, W. A., Drier, Y., Liau, B. B., Gillespie, S. M., Venteicher, A. S., Stemmer-Rachamimov, A. O., Suvà, M. L., & Bernstein, B. E. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16490 · Cited by 1,288
Self-citationWakimoto, H., Tanaka, S., Curry, W. T., Loebel, F., Zhao, D., Tateishi, K., Chen, J., Klofas, L. K., Lelic, N., Kim, J. C., et al. (2014) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-3052 · Cited by 190
Self-citationMyc-Driven glycolysis is a therapeutic target in glioblastoma
Tateishi, K., Iafrate, A. J., Ho, Q., Curry, W. T., Batchelor, T. T., Flaherty, K. T., Onozato, M. L., Lelic, N., Sundaram, S., Cahill, D. P., et al. (2016) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2274 · Cited by 160
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wakimoto, H., Mohapatra, G., Kanai, R., Curry, W. T., Yip, S., Nitta, M., Patel, A. P., Barnard, Z. R., Stemmer-Rachamimov, A. O., Louis, D. N., Martuza, R. L., & Rabkin, S. D.
- Venue
- Neuro-Oncology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 132-144
- ISSN
- 1522-8517 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-5866
- OpenAlex
- W2123369892
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maintenance of primary tumor phenotype and genotype in glioblastoma stem cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/neuonc/nor195
- The paper
- Wakimoto, H., Mohapatra, G., Kanai, R., Curry, W. T., Yip, S., Nitta, M., Patel, A. P., Barnard, Z. R., Stemmer-Rachamimov, A. O., Louis, D. N., Martuza, R. L., & Rabkin, S. D. (2012). Maintenance of primary tumor phenotype and genotype in glioblastoma stem cells. Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.