Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maintenance of primary tumor phenotype and genotype in glioblastoma stem cells

Open access
Wakimoto, H., Mohapatra, G., Kanai, R., Curry, W. T., Yip, S., Nitta, M., Patel, A. P., Barnard, Z. R., Stemmer-Rachamimov, A. O., Louis, D. N., Martuza, R. L., Rabkin, S. D.·2012·Neuro-Oncology

Abstract

The clinicopathological heterogeneity of glioblastoma (GBM) and the various genetic and phenotypic subtypes in GBM stem cells (GSCs) are well described. However, the relationship between GSCs and the corresponding primary tumor from which they were isolated is poorly understood. We have established GSC-enriched neurosphere cultures from 15 newly diagnosed GBM specimens and examined the relationship between the histopathological and genomic features of GSC-derived orthotopic xenografts and those of the respective patient tumors. GSC-initiated xenografts recapitulate the distinctive cytological hallmarks and diverse histological variants associated with the corresponding patient GBM, including giant cell and gemistocytic GBM, and primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET)-like components. This indicates that GSCs generate tumors that preserve patient-specific disease phenotypes. The majority of GSC-derived intracerebral xenografts (11 of 15) demonstrated a highly invasive behavior crossing the midline, whereas the remainder formed discrete nodular and vascular masses. In some cases, GSC invasiveness correlated with preoperative MRI, but not with the status of PI3-kinase/Akt pathways or O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase expression. Genome-wide screening by array comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that GSCs harbor unique genetic copy number aberrations. GSCs acquiring amplifications of the myc family genes represent only a minority of tumor cells within the original patient tumors. Thus, GSCs are a genetically distinct subpopulation of neoplastic cells within a GBM. These studies highlight the value of GSCs for preclinical modeling of clinically relevant, patient-specific GBM and, thus, pave the way for testing novel anti-GSC/GBM agents for personalized therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/neuonc/nor195

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Wen, 2008, New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 492, 10.1056/NEJMra0708126 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Stupp, 2009, The lancet oncology, 10, 459, 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Miller, 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 131, 397, 10.5858/2007-131-397-G · doi:10.5858/2007-131-397-g
  4. Reya, 2001, Nature; Physical Science (London), 414, 105, 10.1038/35102167 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Singh, 2004, Nature; Physical Science (London), 432, 396, 10.1038/nature03128 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Galli, 2004, Cancer Research, 64, 7011, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1364 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Beier, 2007, Cancer Research, 67, 4010, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4180 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Chen, 2010, Cancer cell, 17, 362, 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.049 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Joo, 2008, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 88, 808, 10.1038/labinvest.2008.57 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bao, 2006, Nature; Physical Science (London), 444, 756, 10.1038/nature05236 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Liu, 2006, Molecular cancer [electronic resource], 5, 67, 10.1186/1476-4598-5-67 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 2009, Cancer Research, 69, 3472, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3886 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Decarvalho, 2010, Stem Cells, 28, 181, 10.1002/stem.264 · DOI
  14. 2010, Neuro-Oncology, 12, 1220, 10.1093/neuonc/noq102 · DOI
  15. Gunther, 2008, Oncogene, 27, 2897, 10.1038/sj.onc.1210949 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2008, Molecular Cancer Research, 6, 21, 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-0280 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Lee, 2006, Cancer cell, 9, 391, 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.030 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2010, Cancer Research, 70, 2030, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1707 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2009, Clinical Cancer Research, 15, 6541, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0695 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Esteller, 1999, Cancer Research, 59, 793
  21. Gabeau-Lacet, 2009, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology, 68, 1155, 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181ba3952 · DOI
  22. Mohapatra, 2006, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 8, 268, 10.2353/jmoldx.2006.050109 · DOI
  23. Perry, 2009, Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 19, 81, 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00167.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. Molina, 2010, Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 12, 453, 10.1593/neo.10126 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hegi, 2005, New England Journal of Medicine, 352, 997, 10.1056/NEJMoa043331 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Cho, 2008, Current opinion in genetics & development, 18, 48, 10.1016/j.gde.2008.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Shackleton, 2009, Cell, 138, 822, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.017 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Picard-Riera, 2004, Journal of neuroscience research, 76, 223, 10.1002/jnr.20040 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Candolfi, 2007, Journal of neuro-oncology, 85, 133, 10.1007/s11060-007-9400-9 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2010, 1, 40, 10.4103/2152-7806.68337 · doi:10.4103/2152-7806.68337
  31. Aghi, 2005, Clinical Cancer Research, 11, 8600, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0713 · DOI
  32. Pandita, 2004, Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 39, 29, 10.1002/gcc.10300 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 2005, Neuro-Oncology, 7, 164, 10.1215/S1152851704000821 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Rao, 2010, Journal of neuro-oncology, 96, 169, 10.1007/s11060-009-9959-4 · DOI
  35. Wang, 2008, 3, e3769, 10.1371/journal.pone.0003769 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2009, Cancer Research, 69, 9211, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1622 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Piccirillo, 2009, Oncogene, 28, 1807, 10.1038/onc.2009.27 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Barabe, 2007, Science, 316, 600, 10.1126/science.1139851 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Park, 2010, Journal of Clinical Investigation, 120, 636, 10.1172/JCI40724 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Anderson, 2011, Nature; Physical Science (London), 469, 356, 10.1038/nature09650 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Notta, 2011, Nature; Physical Science (London), 469, 362, 10.1038/nature09733 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Wakimoto, H., Mohapatra, G., Kanai, R., Curry, W. T., Yip, S., Nitta, M., Patel, A. P., Barnard, Z. R., Stemmer-Rachamimov, A. O., Louis, D. N., Martuza, R. L., & Rabkin, S. D.
Venue
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2011-11-07
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
132-144
ISSN
  • 1522-8517 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-5866
OpenAlex
W2123369892
Cited by
244
References
5
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maintenance of primary tumor phenotype and genotype in glioblastoma stem cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/neuonc/nor195
The paper
Wakimoto, H., Mohapatra, G., Kanai, R., Curry, W. T., Yip, S., Nitta, M., Patel, A. P., Barnard, Z. R., Stemmer-Rachamimov, A. O., Louis, D. N., Martuza, R. L., & Rabkin, S. D. (2012). Maintenance of primary tumor phenotype and genotype in glioblastoma stem cells. Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor195

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.