Cited by 226Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyUrban Transport and Accessibility

Retail Tobacco Outlet Density and Youth Cigarette Smoking: A Propensity-Modeling Approach

Open access
Novak, Scott P., Reardon, Sean F., Raudenbush, Stephen W., Buka, Stephen L.·2006·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We examined whether retail tobacco outlet density was related to youth cigarette smoking after control for a diverse range of neighborhood characteristics. Methods. Data were gathered from 2116 respondents (aged 11 to 23 years) residing in 178 census tracts in Chicago, Ill. Propensity score stratification methods for continuous exposures were used to adjust for potentially confounding neighborhood characteristics, thus strengthening causal inferences. Results. Retail tobacco outlets were disproportionately located in neighborhoods characterized by social and economic disadvantage. In a model that excluded neighborhood confounders, a marginally significant effect was found. Youths in areas at the highest 75th percentile in retail tobacco outlet density were 13% more likely (odds ratio [OR]=1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.99, 1.28) to have smoked in the past month compared with those living at the lowest 25th percentile. However, the relation became stronger and significant (OR=0.21; 95% CI=1.04, 1.41) after introduction of tract-level confounders and was statistically significant in the propensity score–adjusted model (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.001, 1.44). Results did not differ significantly between minors and those legally permitted to smoke. Conclusions. Reductions in retail tobacco outlet density may reduce rates of youth smoking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2004.061622

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Novak, S. P., Reardon, S. F., Raudenbush, S. W., & Buka, S. L.
Affiliations
RTI International (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2006-04
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
670-676
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2072069628
Cited by
226
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 20
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • Harvard University
  • RTI International
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA013814)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
neighborhood disadvantage, socioeconomic deprivation, tobacco retail access, smoking prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Chicago, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Residence Characteristics, Smoking, Nicotiana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review