Cited by 65Smoking Behavior and CessationMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsBehavioral Health and Interventions

How well is intervention content described in published reports of smoking cessation interventions?

Lorencatto, F., West, R., Stavri, Z., Michie, S.·2013·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Behavioral support interventions for smoking cessation are typically complex, involving multiple interacting component behavior change techniques (BCTs). Precise reporting of intervention content is important for progress in the field. This study assessed the adequacy of published descriptions of the content of smoking cessation behavioral support interventions. METHODS: About 152 trials of behavioral support were identified from Cochrane reviews. Authors were contacted up to 3 times requesting a copy of the intervention manual. Descriptions of intervention content in manuals and the corresponding publications were coded into component BCTs using an established taxonomy. The proportion of manual-specified content reported in subsequent trial reports was examined. RESULTS: Manuals were received for 28 interventions published between 1992 and 2008. An average of 27 BCTs were identified per manual (range: 5-56), whereas published descriptions averaged only 12 (range: 3-26) (t[27] = 4.15, p < .001 for the difference). CONCLUSIONS: Published reports of evaluations of smoking cessation behavioral support interventions typically mention fewer than half the behavior change techniques specified in the corresponding intervention manuals; this deficit in reporting could be remedied by journals insisting on full manuals being provided as supplementary electronic files.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/nts266

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review authors requested additional materials or information that would provide further detail on the content of the intervention (e.g. trial protocol, letters sent to participants, participant information sheets, intervention manuals).

    “We requested additional materials or information that would provide further detail on the content of the intervention (e.g.trial protocol, letters sent to participants, participant information sheets, intervention manuals (Lorencatto 2013)).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lorencatto, F., West, R., Stavri, Z., & Michie, S.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Cancer Research UK (GB)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2012-12-21
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
1273-1282
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2131758643
Cited by
65
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Psychological Association
  • Cancer Research UK (14135)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (DOH T336/BSS/M 49945)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
smoking cessation, behaviour change techniques, intervention manual, reporting quality, trial reports
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Publishing, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Smoking Cessation, Research Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review