Cited by 52Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkplace Health and Well-beingStress and Burnout Research

Age-related effects of job characteristics on burnout and work engagement

Ramos, R., Jenny, G., Bauer, G.·2016·Occupational Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In light of an ageing and age-diverse workforce, it is imperative to understand how psychosocial aspects of work might influence health throughout working life. Recently, there has been an implicit call to differentiate job characteristics beyond the two factors of job demands and job resources. As needs, abilities and motivation fluctuate with age, different job characteristics might yield differential benefits. Additionally, markers beyond chronological age should be considered. AIMS: To explore systematically interactions between different job characteristics, age and age covariates (i.e. job tenure and position type) and their relationship with work-related health outcomes. METHODS: An online survey of workers in Switzerland, Austria and Germany, recruited through a panel data service provider. We excluded participants working fewer than 30 hours a week, trainees, self-employed people and senior managers. We assessed seven areas of psychosocial risks at work, burnout, work engagement and demographics. RESULTS: Of the 6000 workers contacted, 1916 responded (31%). After applying exclusion criteria, we analysed data from 1417 respondents. We found that age barely had a moderating effect between psychosocial factors and health outcomes, but its three-way interaction with age covariates had more explanatory potential. Young workers with high job tenure showed particular vulnerability to job demands and the lack of certain job resources. Older workers with managerial positions were more resilient. CONCLUSIONS: Age and its covariates, such as job tenure and position type, should be considered in developing age-sensitive occupational health models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/occmed/kqv172

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramos, R., Jenny, G., & Bauer, G.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
Occupational Medicine
Published
2016-01-24
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
230-237
ISSN
  • 0962-7480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8405
OpenAlex
W2261379805
Cited by
52
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Occupational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
job characteristics, burnout, work engagement, age differences, job demands, job resources, job tenure, managerial roles, aging workforce
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Austria, Burnout, Professional, Cross-Sectional Studies, Employment, Female, Germany, Humans, Job Description, Job Satisfaction, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Switzerland, Occupational Health, Workload, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review