The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cultures In Organizations: Three Perspectives
Abstract
This is essentially a textbook in organizational culture. But, unlike most textbooks authors, Professor Martin is making a contribution to the field in that she focusses on a way of looking at the field that is new. In the past, those who have studied organizational culture have usually done so from one of three perspectives: 1) “Integration” - all members of an organization share a consensus of values and purpose; 2) “Differentiation” - there are frequent conflicts among groups in organizations with limited consensus; 3) “Fragmentation” - there is considereable ambiguity in organizations with consensus coexisting with conflict, and much change among groups. The author argues that the best way to view organizations is to see them through all three perspectives - each revealing a different kind of truth. The author has done extensive research studying the organizational culture of a large California high technology firm (which is not identified in the book). She interviewed many employees at different levels and in different departments, and used surveys to extend the interviews. Her work is like an ethnography in which the researcher’s own perspectives and cultural norms have to be accounted for. As a result, the book explores what she learned from her studies and how she learned it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DiMaggio, P. (1997) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263 · Cited by 3,161
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006) · Business Ethics: A European Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x · Cited by 1,653
SCHNEIDER, B., GOLDSTIEIN, H. W., & SMITH, D. B. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01780.x · Cited by 1,346
The Strength of Corporate Culture and the Reliability of Firm Performance
Sørensen, J. B. (2002) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094891 · Cited by 1,004
Robey, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.2.167 · Cited by 765
1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047186 · Cited by 731
Umbrella Advocates Versus Validity Police: A Life-Cycle Model
Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.2.199 · Cited by 609
Conflict amid Community: The Micropolitics of Teacher Collaboration
Achinstein, B. (2002) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00168 · Cited by 570
The Challenge of Collaborative Governance
Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000) · Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory · doi:10.1080/14719030000000021 · Cited by 455
The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics
Yun, J. J., Zhao, X., Jung, K., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12125076 · Cited by 341
Cohen, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672972311006 · Cited by 255
Bridging corporate and organizational communication: Review, development and a look to the future
Thøger Christensen, L., & Cornelissen, J. (2011) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318910390194 · Cited by 250
Tear, M. J., Reader, T. W., Shorrock, S., & Kirwan, B. (2020) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.014 · Cited by 116
Employment Ads: A Configurational Research Agenda
Rafaeli, A., & Oliver, A. L. (1998) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/105649269874009 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, J.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 1992-12-03
- OpenAlex
- W4388378467
- Cited by
- 1,183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.89
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.