Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 475

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Onset and Disappearance of Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

Talley, Nicholas J., Weaver, Amy L., Zinsmeister, Alan R., Melton, L. Joseph·1992·American Journal of Epidemiology
DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116483
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Functional gastrointestinal disorders, including the irritable bowel syndrome, account for up to 40% of referrals to gastroenterologists, but accurate data on the natural history of these disorders in the general population are lacking. Using a reliable and valid questionnaire, the authors estimated the onset and disappearance of symptoms consistent with functional gastrointestinal disorders. An age- and sex-stratified random sample of 1,021 eligible residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, aged 30-64 years were initially mailed the questionnaire; 82% responded (n = 835). In a remailing to responders 12-20 months later, 83% responded again (n = 690). The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence rates per 100 for irritable bowel syndrome, chronic constipation, chronic diarrhea, and frequent dyspepsia were 18.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.1-21.1), 14.7 (95% CI 11.9-17.4), 7.3 (95% CI 5.3-9.3), and 14.1 (95% CI 11.5-16.8), respectively, on the second mailing. Symptoms were not significantly associated with nonresponse to the second mailing; moreover, the estimated prevalence rates were not significantly different from the first mailing. Among the 582 subjects free of the irritable bowel syndrome on the first survey, 9% developed symptoms during 795 person-years of follow-up, while 38% of the 108 who initially had the irritable bowel syndrome did not meet the criteria after 146 person-years of follow-up. Similar onset and disappearance rates were observed for the other main symptom categories. While functional gastrointestinal symptoms are common in middle-aged persons and overall prevalence appears relatively stable over 12-20 months, substantial turnover is implied by the observed onset and disappearance rates; several potential sources of bias do not seem to account for this variation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116483

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Talley, N. J., Weaver, A. L., Zinsmeister, A. R., & Melton, L. J.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1992-07-15
Volume
136
Issue
2
Pages
165-177
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
DOI
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116483
OpenAlex
W2104795459
Cited by
475
References
0
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.