Cited by 65Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparison of the effects of strength and aerobic exercise training on exercise capacity and lipids after coronary artery bypass surgery

Wosornu, D., Bedford, D., Ballantyne, D.·1996·European Heart Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery surgery improves symptoms and prognosis in patients with angina. Aerobic exercise rehabilitation improves exercise capacity and prognosis in cardiac patients. Strength exercise training has not been extensively studied. DESIGN: We studied the effects of 6 months aerobic and strength exercise training after coronary artery surgery in 81 men, mean age 57 years. RESULTS: Treadmill time(s) increased by 130.3 (95% confidence interval 46.4 to 214.2) in the aerobic group; by 83.1 (0.9 to 165.3) in the strength group, and by 34.3 (-1 to 69.6) in the control group (P = 0.04, control versus aerobic) after 3 months; and by 196.4 (112.2 to 280.7) in the aerobic group, by 122.7 (37.7 to 207.6) in the strength group and by 27 (-40.4 to 94.4) in the control group (P = 0.002, control versus aerobic, and P = 0.03 control versus strength) after 6 months. The level of fitness improved more in the strength-trained group, and there was a minor reduction in body weight and degree of fatness. There were no changes in lipoprotein levels. Aerobic exercise training causes early and sustained benefit in treadmill exercise capacity, while the effects of strength exercise training are later in onset. Exercise training alone did not influence lipid levels. CONCLUSION: Cardiac rehabilitation programmes should be comprehensive, including advice on diet and other risk factor modifications in addition to exercise sessions involving aerobic and strength training elements.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014966

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wosornu, D., Bedford, D., & Ballantyne, D.
Affiliations
  • Selly Oak Hospital (GB)
  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • Glasgow Victoria Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Wosornu, D.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
1996-06-02
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
854-863
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2055733037
Cited by
65
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
coronary artery bypass grafting, resistance training, aerobic exercise training, cardiac rehabilitation, exercise capacity, treadmill exercise time, lipoprotein levels, postoperative rehabilitation, angina pectoris, weight loss, adiposity
MeSH terms
Aged, Coronary Artery Bypass, Cholesterol, Exercise Test, Humans, Lipoproteins, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Prognosis, Exercise, Exercise Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review