Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 617

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using an Animal Model of Deficient Sensorimotor Gating to Study the Pathophysiology and New Treatments of Schizophrenia

Swerdlow, N. R., Geyer, M. A.·1998·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

Certain animal models can greatly enhance our understanding of the neurobiology of schizophrenia and can be used to predict the antipsychotic activity of compounds. Prepulse inhibition (PPI), the reduction in startle produced by a prepulse stimulus, is diminished in schizophrenia patients. Theoretically, deficient PPI in schizophrenia patients is a measure of the loss of sensorimotor gating that may lead to sensory flooding and cognitive fragmentation. In rats, PPI is disrupted by systemic administration of dopamine agonists, serotonin agonists, or glutamate antagonists and by a variety of surgical or pharmacological manipulations of neural circuitry linking the limbic cortex, striatum, pallidum, and pontine reticular formation. This article describes several different ways the loss of PPI in rats can be used as a model for studying the pathophysiology and neurobiology of impaired sensorimotor gating in schizophrenia patients and for predicting antipsychotic activity in novel compounds. First, new experimental strategies may be used to distinguish behavioral profiles of "typical" versus "atypical" antipsychotics. Second, this paradigm can be used to study the effects of early developmental insults--including neonatal lesions and isolated rearing--on the adult emergence of deficient sensorimotor gating. Third, using different animal strains and species, as well as gene "knockout" strategies, greatly increases our ability to understand specific genetic or receptor contributions to the regulation of deficient PPI. Each of these uses of the PPI paradigm is enhanced by studies of the basic brain substrates that regulate PPI in rats and by the increasingly sophisticated assessments of PPI and related measures in schizophrenia spectrum patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033326

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 617

Metadata

Authors
Swerdlow, N. R., & Geyer, M. A.
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
1998-01-01
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
285-301
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2029277771
Cited by
617
References
7
FWCI
25.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using an Animal Model of Deficient Sensorimotor Gating to Study the Pathophysiology and New Treatments of Schizophrenia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033326
The paper
Swerdlow, N. R., & Geyer, M. A. (1998). Using an Animal Model of Deficient Sensorimotor Gating to Study the Pathophysiology and New Treatments of Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033326

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.