The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: are we measuring the ‘‘right stuff’’?
Abstract
There has been a surge of interest in the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia. The published literature in this area has doubled in the last few years. In this paper, we will attempt to confirm the conclusions from a previous review that certain neurocognitive domains (secondary verbal memory, immediate memory, executive functioning as measured by card sorting, and vigilance) are associated with functional outcome. In addition to surveying the number of replicated findings and tallying box scores of results, we will approach the review of the studies in a more thorough and empirical manner by applying a meta-analysis. Lastly, we will discuss what we see as a key limitation of this literature, specifically, the relatively narrow selection of predictor measures. This limitation has constrained identification of mediating variables that may explain the mechanisms for these relationships.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Cognition determines, to a considerable extent, one's social and professional success and the ability to live independently (Audet, Hebert, Dubois, Rochette, & Mercier, 2007; Benedict & Zivadinov, 2006; Green, Kern, Braff, & Mintz, 2000).”
From Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Green, Kern, Braff, & Mintz, 2000
In the citing paper
“These impairments have been shown to be associated with various impaired functional outcomes.4,5”
From Clinical trials of potential cognitive-enhancing drugs in schizophrenia: what have we learned so far? (2013) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cites
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia?
(1996) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.153.3.321 · Cited by 3,516
Self-citationVygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind
Kozulin, A., & Wertsch, J. V. (1987) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422646 · Cited by 3,339
(1995) · Cited by 2,809
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual
Heaton, R. K. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,604
Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.: II. Impact on employment and social functioning
Rao, S. M., Leo, G. J., Ellington, L., Nauertz, T., Bernardin, L., & Unverzagt, F. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.5.692 · Cited by 890
Loeb, M., Davies, D. R., & Parasuraman, R. (1984) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422535 · Cited by 716
Breier, A. (1991) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810270051007 · Cited by 626
Further Evidence for Dementia of the Prefrontal Type in Schizophrenia?
Goldberg, T. E. (1987) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800230088014 · Cited by 521
Should schizophrenia be treated as a neurocognitive disorder?
Green, M. F., & Nuechterlein, K. (1999) · Schizophrenia bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033380 · Cited by 447
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Os, J., & Kapur, S. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60995-8 · Cited by 1,971
Fett, A.-K. J., Viechtbauer, W., Dominguez, M.-D.-G., Penn, D. L., van Os, J., & Krabbendam, L. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.001 · Cited by 1,833
Keefe, R. (2004) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2003.09.011 · Cited by 1,573
Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS
Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., & Heaton, R. K. (2004) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.009 · Cited by 1,422
Self-citationAssessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues.
CHAN, R., SHUM, D., TOULOPOULOU, T., & CHEN, E. (2008) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010 · Cited by 1,401
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., Braff, D. L., & Mintz, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Green, M. F.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-136
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- OpenAlex
- W2150174494
- Cited by
- 2,999
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 143 · 2016: 146 · 2015: 180 · 2014: 146 · 2013: 180 · 2012: 183
- FWCI
- 31.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, neurocognitive impairment
- MeSH terms
- Cognition Disorders, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Adjustment, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
