Cited by 54Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The Resurrection of Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation: Outcomes Across a Veterans Affairs Collaborative

Open access
Murphy, Jennifer L, Palyo, Sarah A, Schmidt, Zachary S, Hollrah, Lauren N, Banou, Evangelia, Van Keuren, Cynthia P, Strigo, Irina A·2021·Pain Medicine

Abstract

Objective: Despite empirical support for interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs improving functioning and quality of life, access to this treatment approach has decreased dramatically over the last 20 years within the United States but has grown significantly in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Between 2009 and 2019, VA pain rehabilitation programs accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities increased 10-fold in the VA, expanding from two to 20. The aim of this collaborative observational evaluation was to examine patient outcomes across a subset of six programs at five sites. Methods: Outcomes were assessed using agreed-upon measures of patient-reported pain intensity, pain interference across various domains, pain catastrophizing, and sleep. Results: A total of 931 patients enrolled in the selected VA interdisciplinary pain programs, with 84.1% of participants completing the full course of treatment. Overall, all programs showed significant improvements from pretreatment to posttreatment in nearly all patient-reported outcomes. The effect sizes ranged from medium to large. Notably, the results demonstrate that positive outcomes were typical despite differences in structure and resources across programs. Conclusions: The adverse impacts of opioid use have highlighted the importance of chronic pain treatment approaches that emphasize team-based care focused on functional improvements. This study represents the first and largest analysis of outcomes across chronic pain rehabilitation programs and demonstrates the need for increased access to similar comprehensive approaches to pain management across the health care system. Further, it suggests that a variety of structures may be effective, encouraging flexibility in adopting this interdisciplinary approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pm/pnaa417

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2015;350 :h444.
  2. Schatman ME. The demise of multidisciplinary pain manage- ment clinics? Pract Pain Manag 2006;6(1):30-41.
  3. Gironda RJ, Azzarello L, Clark ME. Test-retest reliability of the National Pain Data Bank V. 2.0. Am J Pain Mgmt 2002;12:24-30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, J. L., Palyo, S. A., Schmidt, Z. S., Hollrah, L. N., Banou, E., Van Keuren, C. P., & Strigo, I. A.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • New Mexico VA Health Care System (US)
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
  • James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (US)
  • VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Corresponding author
Murphy, Jennifer L
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2021-01-26
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
430-443
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W3123764856
Cited by
54
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • US Department of Veterans Affairs (I01-CX-000816, I01-CX-001652)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
  • National Institutes of Health (U19AR076737, UH2AR076724)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation, chronic pain, veterans, patient-reported outcomes, pain intensity, pain interference, pain catastrophizing, sleep, opioid use, team-based care
MeSH terms
Humans, Quality of Life, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans, Chronic Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review