The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption
Open accessAbstract
Online publishing, social networks, and web search have dramatically lowered the costs of producing, distributing, and discovering news articles. Some scholars argue that such technological changes increase exposure to diverse perspectives, while others worry that they increase ideological segregation. We address the issue by examining web-browsing histories for 50,000 US-located users who regularly read online news. We find that social networks and search engines are associated with an increase in the mean ideological distance between individuals. However, somewhat counterintuitively, these same channels also are associated with an increase in an individual’s exposure to material from his or her less preferred side of the political spectrum. Finally, the vast majority of online news consumption is accounted for by individuals simply visiting the home pages of their favorite, typically mainstream, news outlets, tempering the consequences—both positive and negative—of recent technological changes. We thus uncover evidence for both sides of the debate, while also finding that the magnitude of the effects is relatively modest.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is significant research on the ways in which algorithms produce search results that mirror people’s worldviews, but the majority of that work has been carried out on social networks [83,84].”
From Evolving Health Information–Seeking Behavior in the Context of Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Alexa: Interview Study Using the Think-Aloud Protocol (2025) · cites this paper as [84]
In the citing paper
“Web traffic data suggest that relatively few Americans have heavily skewed information diets15–18”
From Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Pese a que son numerosos los estudios basados en la polarización afectiva y los medios de comunicación (Stroud, 2010;Flaxman et al., 2016;Tsfati & Nir, 2017;Rojo-Martínez et al., 2023;Torcal, 2023), no son tan frecuentes aquellos que estudian el nivel de uso de diferentes medios de forma integrada, asumiendo la condición híbrida del sistema mediático, y analizan según esta el grado de polarización”
From Política, uso de medios y polarización afectiva en España (2024) · cites this paper as Flaxman et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Esta práctica cotidiana y hábito informativo convertiría a las sociedades occidentales menos tolerantes con aquellos puntos de vista opuestos a los propios (Jamieson y Capella, 2008) y con posiciones u opiniones más extremas, que devienen en una creciente polarización de la sociedad (Flaxman et al., 2016).”
From Homofilia, polarización afectiva y desinformación en Twitter. Caso de estudio sobre la crisis migratoria #Openarms (2021) · cites this paper as Flaxman et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with recent observational studies of online web browsing behavior which find that, with respect to political news, partisans di↵er in their typical media diet even as they do not completely retreat into echo chambers (see e.g., Peterson et al., ND, Flaxman et al., 2016, Guess, 2019).”
From Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information-Seeking Behavior: Motivated Reasoning or Cheerleading? (2019) · cites this paper as Flaxman et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“This also reaffirms the fact that the negative effects of echo chambers in social networks, which are known to arise due to high levels of homophily in communication, might be overstated”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Flaxman et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Del Vicario et al. [48] and Flaxman et al. [134] demonstrated that contentconsidering methods effectively detect echo chambers formed through selective content exposure.”
From A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [134]
In the citing paper
“Some studies observe reinforcement of this sort (92); others provide conflicting evidence in both magnitude and direction (93-96).”
From Misinformation in and about science (2021) · cites this paper as [94]
In the citing paper
“With the advent of the Internet, online media has become a widespread source of information and, subsequently, opinion formation5–9.”
From Negativity drives online news consumption (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cites
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. J. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,558
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597
Foundations of statistical natural language processing
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999) · Cited by 9,816
On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization
Liu, D. C., & Nocedal, J. M. (1989) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/bf01589116 · Cited by 9,062
(2011) · Cited by 4,430
Benkler, Y. R. (2017) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300127232 · Cited by 3,728
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160 · Cited by 3,245
Broder, A. (2002) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/792550.792552 · Cited by 1,944
Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x · Cited by 1,940
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,003
Facts, Interactivity and Videotape
Hook, J. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video · doi:10.1145/3210825.3210826 · Cited by 17
Demographic factors and trust in different news sources
Verma, N., Fleischmann, K. R., & Koltai, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501057 · Cited by 17
Integrating Non-Psychiatric Models of Delusion-Like Beliefs into Forensic Psychiatric Assessment.
Pierre, J. M. (2019) · PubMed · doi:10.29158/jaapl.003833-19 · Cited by 19
Browse, S., Gibbons, A., & Hatavara, M. (2019) · Narrative Inquiry · doi:10.1075/ni.19025.bro · Cited by 17
Workshop on Detection and Design for Cognitive Biases in People and Computing Systems
Dingler, T., Tag, B., Karapanos, E., Kise, K., & Dengel, A. (2020) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3334480.3375159 · Cited by 17
Exposure to Difference on Facebook, Trust, and Political Knowledge
Hopp, T., Ferrucci, P., Vargo, C. J., & Fisher, J. (2020) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2020.1823002 · Cited by 21
Analyzing temporal patterns of topic diversity using graph clustering
Hashimoto, T., Shepard, D., Kuboyama, T., Shin, K., Kobayashi, R., & Uno, T. (2020) · Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-020-03433-5 · Cited by 19
Causal Network Motifs: Identifying Heterogeneous Spillover Effects in A/B Tests
Yuan, Y., Altenburger, K. M., & Kooti, F. (2021) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 17
Media literacy for children: Empowering citizens for a mediatized world
Mateus, J.-C. (2021) · Global Studies of Childhood · doi:10.1177/20436106211014903 · Cited by 17
The Appropriation/Amplification Model of Citizen Journalism
Usher, N. (2016) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2016.1223552 · Cited by 22
Porous Chambers, Echoes of Valence and Stereotypes
Turetsky, K. M., & Riddle, T. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617733519 · Cited by 18
The Civic Mission of MOOCs: Engagement across Political Differences in Online Forums
Yeomans, M., Stewart, B., Mavon, K., Kindel, A., Tingley, D. H., & Reich, J. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-017-0161-0 · Cited by 17
Viewpoint Discovery and Understanding in Social Networks
Quraishi, M. A. N., Fafalios, P., & Herder, E. (2018) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3201064.3201076 · Cited by 17
How Intention Informed Recommendations Modulate Choices: A Field Study of Spoken Word Content
Yang, L., Sobolev, M., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Dunne, D., Tsangouri, C., Dell, N. L., Naaman, M., & Estrin, D. L. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313540 · Cited by 17
The Impact of Curation Algorithms on Social Network Content Quality and StructurePreprint
Berman, R., & Katona, Z. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2848526 · Cited by 17
Micro Influence and Macro Dynamics of OpinionsPreprint
von Hohenberg, B. C., Mäs, M., & Pradelski, B. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2974413 · Cited by 16
Rethinking the Generational Gap in Online News Use: An Infrastructural PerspectivePreprint
Taneja, H., Wu, A. X., & Edgerly, S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.01217 · Cited by 17
Opinion Dynamics via Search Engines (and Other Algorithmic Gatekeepers)Preprint
Germano, F., & Sobbrio, F. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2890853 · Cited by 20
The American Viewer: Political Consequences of Entertainment Media
Kim, E., & Patterson, S. (2024) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055424000728 · Cited by 16
Disinformation, Digital Information Equality, and Electoral Integrity
Judge, E. F., & Korhani, A. M. (2019) · Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy · doi:10.1089/elj.2019.0566 · Cited by 16
Slaets, A., Verhoest, P., d’Haenens, L., Minnen, J., & Glorieux, I. (2020) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/0267323120966841 · Cited by 16
Measuring Partisan Media Bias Cross‐Nationally
Castro, L. (2021) · Swiss Political Science Review · doi:10.1111/spsr.12459 · Cited by 16
Zafrilla, P. J. P. (2021) · Recerca Revista de pensament i anàlisi · doi:10.6035/recerca.4661 · Cited by 25
Zhang, T., Dong, P., Zeng, Y., & Ju, Y. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.027 · Cited by 16
MANIFESTO: a huMAN-centric explaInable approach for FakE news spreaders deTectiOn
Lampridis, O., Karanatsiou, D., & Vakali, A. I. (2022) · Computing · doi:10.1007/s00607-021-01013-w · Cited by 17
A Comprehensive Review on Countering Rumours in the Age of Online Social Media Platforms
Fard, A. E., & Verma, T. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-5268-4_11 · Cited by 18
Christensen, B., Laydon, D. J., Chełkowski, T., Jemielniak, D., Vollmer, M., Bhatt, S., & Krawczyk, K. (2022) · JMIR Infodemiology · doi:10.2196/35121 · Cited by 16
A comparative study of item space visualizations for recommender systems
Kunkel, J., & Ziegler, J. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102987 · Cited by 19
«LO POLÍTICO COMO ALGO PERSONAL»: UNA REVISIÓN TEÓRICA SOBRE LA POLARIZACIÓN AFECTIVA
Martínez, J. M. R., & CRESPO-MARTÍNEZ, I. (2023) · Revista de ciencia política · doi:10.4067/s0718-090x2023005000102 · Cited by 31
Kristensen, J. B., Henriksen, F. M., & Mayerhöffer, E. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231192963 · Cited by 18
Zhai, W., Yu, H., & Song, Y. (2023) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2023.2271549 · Cited by 16
Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2023) · The Review of International Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11558-023-09517-0 · Cited by 16
Miller, S., Menard, P., & Bourrie, D. M. (2023) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2023.103912 · Cited by 22
Distinguishing between Personal Preferences and Social Influence in Online Activity Feeds
Sharma, A., & Cosley, D. (2016) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2818048.2819982 · Cited by 17
Hsiao, Y. (2020) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soaa064 · Cited by 16
Neumann, T., Kelm, O., & Dohle, M. (2021) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2021.1969621 · Cited by 21
News by Popular Demand: Ideological Congruence, Issue Salience, and Media Reputation in News Sharing
Aruguete, N., Calvo, E., & Ventura, T. (2023) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612211057068 · Cited by 15
Twitter and Affective Polarisation: Following Political Leaders in Spain
Rodríguez, J. L., & Torcal, M. (2022) · South European Society & Politics · doi:10.1080/13608746.2022.2047554 · Cited by 23
Guo, M., & Sun, F.-S. (2022) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2022.2074519 · Cited by 22
Understanding Conspiracy Online: Social Media and the Spread of Suspicious Thinking
Mortimer, K. (2017) · Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management · doi:10.5931/djim.v13i1.6928 · Cited by 16
Fox, S. (2018) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.009 · Cited by 16
Majority-vote model with limited visibility: An investigation into filter bubbles
Vilela, A. L. M., Pereira, L. F. C., Dias, L., Stanley, E., & da Silva, L. R. (2020) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2020.125450 · Cited by 16
Thurman, N. (2019) · The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies · doi:10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0052 · Cited by 16
Liu, J., Schwarz, A., Risius, M., Hirschheim, R., & Scotter, J. R. V. (2025) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2025.101904 · Cited by 20
Why more social interactions lead to more polarization in societies
Stefan Thurner, A., Hofer, M., & Korbel, J. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2517530122 · Cited by 22
Bojić, L., Ilić, V., Prodanović, V., & Vuković, V. (2025) · Chinese Political Science Review · doi:10.1007/s41111-025-00326-x · Cited by 21
How should we promote transient diversity in science?
Wu, J., & O’Connor, C. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04037-1 · Cited by 19
Calibeo, D. L., & Hindmarsh, R. (2022) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2022.2028648 · Cited by 15
Optimising Emotions, Incubating Falsehoods
Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13551-4 · Cited by 20
KHAN: Knowledge-Aware Hierarchical Attention Networks for Accurate Political Stance Prediction
Ko, Y., Ryu, S., Han, S., Jeon, Y., Kim, J., Park, S., Han, K., Tong, H., & Kim, S. (2023) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3543507.3583300 · Cited by 22
Palmieri, E. R. D. C. (2023) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-12-2022-1650 · Cited by 15
Dissemination Biases of Social Media Channels: On the Topical Coverage of Socially Shared News
Chakraborty, A., Ghosh, S., Ganguly, N., & Gummadi, K. P. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v10i1.14802 · Cited by 15
Bode, L., Edgerly, S., Wells, C., Gabay, I., Franklin, C., Friedland, L. A., & Shah, D. V. (2018) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2018.1485607 · Cited by 18
Kim, M., & Lu, Y. (2019) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2019.1636283 · Cited by 22
Werner, K. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02464-7 · Cited by 10
Baptista, J. P., Correia, E., Gradim, A., & Piñeiro-Naval, V. (2021) · Revista Latina de Comunicación Social · doi:10.4185/rlcs-2021-1509 · Cited by 15
A New Era of Electoral Instability
Schmitt‐Beck, R., Roßteutscher, S., Schoen, H., Weßels, B., & Wolf, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198847519.003.0001 · Cited by 15
The Motivational Processes of Sense-Making
Wojtowicz, Z., Nick Chater, A., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009026949.002 · Cited by 15
Do Individuals Smile More in Diverse Social Company?
Singh, V. K., Atrey, A., & Hegde, S. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3123266.3127908 · Cited by 15
Tella, R. D., Gálvez, R. H., & Schargrodsky, E. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29458 · Cited by 17
Hidden Incentives for Auto-Induced Distributional Shift
Krueger, D., Maharaj, T., & Leike, J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.09153 · Cited by 14
“In a study of 50,000 US-based internet users, Flaxman & Goel (2015) find that two things increase with social media and search engine use: (1) exposure of an individual to opposing or different viewpoints, and (2) mean ideological distance between users.”
BackgroundAn Exploratory Study on Information Cocoon in Recommender Systems
Zhang, L., Lian, Y., Wu, H., Song, C., & Yuan, X. (2025) · Data Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s41019-025-00288-9 · Cited by 14
Ranking for engagement: How social media algorithms fuel misinformation and polarization
Germano, F., Gómez, V., & Sobbrio, F. (2026) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105589 · Cited by 14
Онлайн-дейтинг: рынок или базар? Процесс поиска брачной пары на православном сайте знакомств
Galitsina, K., Kalinovskaya, P., & Khvorostianova, O. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-65-90 · Cited by 16
In different worlds: The contributions of polarization and platforms to partisan (mis)perceptions
Overgaard, C. S. B., & Collier, J. R. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231176551 · Cited by 14
Online Echo Chambers, Online Epistemic Bubbles, and Open-Mindedness
Turner, C. (2023) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2023.52 · Cited by 16
News Waves: Hard News, Soft News, Fake News, Rumors, News Wavetrains
Vitanov, N. K., Dimitrova, Z. I., & Vitanov, K. N. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e26010005 · Cited by 14
Knowledge mapping of information cocoons: A bibliometric study using visual analysis
Yan, C., Pu, K., & Luo, X. (2024) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/09610006231222628 · Cited by 15
News and misinformation consumption: A temporal comparison across European countries
Baqir, A., Galeazzi, A., & Zollo, F. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302473 · Cited by 17
Askari, H., Chhabra, A., von Hohenberg, B. C., Heseltine, M., & Wojcieszak, M. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae368 · Cited by 15
Jiang, S., Martin, J., & Wilson, C. (2019) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287565 · Cited by 15
Kunkel, J., Schwenger, C., & Ziegler, J. (2020) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3340631.3394869 · Cited by 15
Turn and Face the Strange: Investigating Filter Bubble Bursting Information Interactions
McKay, D., Owyong, K., Makri, S., & Lopez, M. G. (2022) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3498366.3505822 · Cited by 16
Schmitt‐Beck, R., Roßteutscher, S., Schoen, H., Weßels, B., & Wolf, C. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198847519.001.0001 · Cited by 15
Befriended to polarise? The impact of friend identity on review polarisation—A quasi‐experiment
Wang, L., Wang, C., & Yao, X. (2023) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12425 · Cited by 16
Bay, M. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3281450 · Cited by 14
The interpersonal is political: unfriending to promote civic discourse on social media
Elder, A. M. (2019) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-019-09511-4 · Cited by 14
Klug, K., & Strang, C. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30774-5_12 · Cited by 14
Haim, M., & Graefe, A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-93284-2_5 · Cited by 14
Karduni, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.07136 · Cited by 19
Learning from Shared News: When Abundant Information Leads to Belief Polarization
Bowen, R., Dmitriev, D., & Galperti, S. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w28465 · Cited by 15
Castillo-de-Mesa, J., Méndez-Domínguez, P., Carbonero-Muñoz, D., & Gómez-Jacinto, L. (2021) · Redes. Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales · doi:10.5565/rev/redes.913 · Cited by 13
The Role of Higher Education in the Post-Truth Era
Parker, J. (2024) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512169.2024.2354972 · Cited by 20
Hu, A., & Ou, M. (2025) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2025.102291 · Cited by 18
Can the crowd judge truthfulness? A longitudinal study on recent misinformation about COVID-19
Roitero, K., Soprano, M., Portelli, B., Luise, M. D., Spina, D., Mea, V. D., Serra, G., Mizzaro, S., & Demartini, G. (2024) · Figshare · Cited by 13
Normative or Effective? The Role of News Diversity and Trust in News Recommendation Services
Lee, S. Y., & Lee, S. W. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2057116 · Cited by 14
Partisan selective exposure in news consumption
Lumeau, M. (2022) · HAL · Cited by 17
Analyzing the changing landscape of the Covid-19 vaccine debate on Twitter
Santoro, A., Galeazzi, A., Scantamburlo, T., Baronchelli, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Zollo, F. (2023) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-023-01127-3 · Cited by 13
Mitigating Exposure Bias in Recommender Systems—A Comparative Analysis of Discrete Choice Models
Krause, T., Deriyeva, A., Beinke, J. H., Bartels, G. Y., & Thomas, O. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3641291 · Cited by 15
Contesting personalized recommender systems: a cross-country analysis of user preferences
Starke, C., Metikoš, L., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. H. (2024) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2024.2363926 · Cited by 20
Beyond time delays: how web scraping distorts measures of online news consumption
Ulloa, R., Mangold, F., Schmidt, F., Gilsbach, J. M., & Stier, S. (2025) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2025.2482538 · Cited by 16
Frischlich, L. (2018) · Aktivismus- und Propagandaforschung · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-22118-8_6 · Cited by 8
Comportamiento de las comunidades digitales en Twitter durante las elecciones México 2018
del Cid, P. A., González, R. F., & Contreras, M. P. (2020) · Revista de Comunicación · doi:10.26441/rc19.1-2020-a2 · Cited by 13
Facebook favorise-t-il la désinformation et la polarisation idéologique des opinions ?
Figeac, J., Salord, T., Cabanac, G., Fraisier, O., Ratinaud, P., Seffusatti, F., & Smyrnaios, N. (2019) · Questions de communication · doi:10.4000/questionsdecommunication.21149 · Cited by 13
Electoral accountability and selection with personalized information aggregation
Li, A., & Hu, L. (2023) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2023.04.001 · Cited by 13
Qudsi, M. I. E., & Syamtar, I. A. (2020) · Perspektif Komunikasi Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Politik dan Komunikasi Bisnis · doi:10.24853/pk.4.2.167-185 · Cited by 13
Los desafíos de la transformación digital de la democracia
Sala, J. F. A. (2021) · Recerca Revista de pensament i anàlisi · doi:10.6035/recerca.4660 · Cited by 13
García, S. A., Said-Hung, E. M., & Mottareale, D. (2022) · Revista ICONO14 · doi:10.7195/ri14.v21i1.1890 · Cited by 13
Lubashevskiy, V., Ozaydin, S. Y., & Özaydin, F. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e25020365 · Cited by 13
“Citizen Curation” in Online Discussions of Donald Trump’s Presidency
Pedersen, S., & Burnett, S. (2017) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1399806 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 298-320
- ISSN
- 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5331
- OpenAlex
- W2303924600
- Cited by
- 1,992
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 166 · 2025: 177 · 2024: 174 · 2023: 213 · 2022: 277 · 2021: 256 · 2020: 251 · 2019: 228 · 2018: 146 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 18
- FWCI
- 436.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Public Opinion Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- filter bubbles, echo chambers, online news consumption, ideological segregation, ideological distance, social networks, search engines, web browsing history, political polarization, information exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
