The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption
Open accessAbstract
Online publishing, social networks, and web search have dramatically lowered the costs of producing, distributing, and discovering news articles. Some scholars argue that such technological changes increase exposure to diverse perspectives, while others worry that they increase ideological segregation. We address the issue by examining web-browsing histories for 50,000 US-located users who regularly read online news. We find that social networks and search engines are associated with an increase in the mean ideological distance between individuals. However, somewhat counterintuitively, these same channels also are associated with an increase in an individual’s exposure to material from his or her less preferred side of the political spectrum. Finally, the vast majority of online news consumption is accounted for by individuals simply visiting the home pages of their favorite, typically mainstream, news outlets, tempering the consequences—both positive and negative—of recent technological changes. We thus uncover evidence for both sides of the debate, while also finding that the magnitude of the effects is relatively modest.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is significant research on the ways in which algorithms produce search results that mirror people’s worldviews, but the majority of that work has been carried out on social networks [83,84].”
From Evolving Health Information–Seeking Behavior in the Context of Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Alexa: Interview Study Using the Think-Aloud Protocol (2025) · cites this paper as [84]
In the citing paper
“Web traffic data suggest that relatively few Americans have heavily skewed information diets15–18”
From Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Pese a que son numerosos los estudios basados en la polarización afectiva y los medios de comunicación (Stroud, 2010;Flaxman et al., 2016;Tsfati & Nir, 2017;Rojo-Martínez et al., 2023;Torcal, 2023), no son tan frecuentes aquellos que estudian el nivel de uso de diferentes medios de forma integrada, asumiendo la condición híbrida del sistema mediático, y analizan según esta el grado de polarización”
From Política, uso de medios y polarización afectiva en España (2024) · cites this paper as Flaxman et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Esta práctica cotidiana y hábito informativo convertiría a las sociedades occidentales menos tolerantes con aquellos puntos de vista opuestos a los propios (Jamieson y Capella, 2008) y con posiciones u opiniones más extremas, que devienen en una creciente polarización de la sociedad (Flaxman et al., 2016).”
From Homofilia, polarización afectiva y desinformación en Twitter. Caso de estudio sobre la crisis migratoria #Openarms (2021) · cites this paper as Flaxman et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with recent observational studies of online web browsing behavior which find that, with respect to political news, partisans di↵er in their typical media diet even as they do not completely retreat into echo chambers (see e.g., Peterson et al., ND, Flaxman et al., 2016, Guess, 2019).”
From Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information-Seeking Behavior: Motivated Reasoning or Cheerleading? (2019) · cites this paper as Flaxman et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“This also reaffirms the fact that the negative effects of echo chambers in social networks, which are known to arise due to high levels of homophily in communication, might be overstated”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Flaxman et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Del Vicario et al. [48] and Flaxman et al. [134] demonstrated that contentconsidering methods effectively detect echo chambers formed through selective content exposure.”
From A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [134]
In the citing paper
“Some studies observe reinforcement of this sort (92); others provide conflicting evidence in both magnitude and direction (93-96).”
From Misinformation in and about science (2021) · cites this paper as [94]
In the citing paper
“With the advent of the Internet, online media has become a widespread source of information and, subsequently, opinion formation5–9.”
From Negativity drives online news consumption (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cites
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. J. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,558
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597
Foundations of statistical natural language processing
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999) · Cited by 9,816
On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization
Liu, D. C., & Nocedal, J. M. (1989) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/bf01589116 · Cited by 9,062
(2011) · Cited by 4,430
Benkler, Y. R. (2017) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300127232 · Cited by 3,728
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160 · Cited by 3,245
Broder, A. (2002) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/792550.792552 · Cited by 1,944
Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x · Cited by 1,940
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,003
Is There Within-outlet Demand for Media Slant? Evidence from US Presidential Campaign NewsPreprint
Garz, M., Sood, G., Stone, D. F., & Wallace, J. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3009791 · Cited by 10
Opinion dynamics via search engines (and other algorithmic gatekeepers)
Germano, F., & Sobbrio, F. (2020) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104188 · Cited by 11
Schwaiger, L. (2022) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.14361/9783839461211 · Cited by 56
Dorling, D., & Gietel‐Basten, S. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-36-64 · Cited by 8
Weakening the ideological immune system: can debiasing techniques reduce confirmation bias?
Whitt, C. M., Tullett, A. M., Bowes, S. M., McDiarmid, A., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Hart, W. (2023) · Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/23743603.2023.2196755 · Cited by 12
Ünlü, A., & Kotonen, T. (2024) · Scandinavian Political Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-9477.12270 · Cited by 10
Pyle, C., Zhang, Z., Haimson, O. L., & Andalibi, N. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3637342 · Cited by 12
Re-assessing the Dynamics of News Use and Trust: A Multi-Outlet Perspective
Aharoni, T., Baden, C., Overbeck, M., & Tenenboim‐Weinblatt, K. (2024) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502241273263 · Cited by 9
Split-door criterion: Identification of causal effects through auxiliary outcomes
Sharma, A. K., Hofman, J. M., & Watts, D. J. (2018) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/18-aoas1179 · Cited by 9
Uphill from here: Sentiment patterns in videos from left- and right-wing
Soldner, F., Ho, J. C., Makhortykh, M., van der Vegt, I. W. J., Mozes, M., & Kleinberg, B. (2019) · Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-2110 · Cited by 9
"Learning for the Rise of China": Exploring Uses and Gratifications of State-Owned Online Platform
Lu, A. J., & Xu, X. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3392835 · Cited by 9
Langer, P. F., & Weyerer, J. C. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-30997-8_11 · Cited by 11
Learning Analytics for Professional and Workplace Learning: A Literature Review
Ruiz‐Calleja, A., Prieto, L. P., Ley, T., Rodríguez‐Triana, M. J., & Dennerlein, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2021.3092219 · Cited by 9
Reducing the filter bubble effect on Twitter by considering communities for recommendations
Grossetti, Q., du Mouza, C., Travers, N., & Constantin, C. (2021) · International Journal of Web Information Systems · doi:10.1108/ijwis-06-2021-0065 · Cited by 9
Mass Media Influence on the Rapid Rise of Climate Change
Damsbo-Svendsen, S. (2022) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edac009 · Cited by 11
AI Facilitated Isolations? The Impact of Recommendation-based Influence Diffusion in Human Society
Hu, Y., Wu, S., Jiang, C., Li, W., Bai, Q., & Roehrer, E. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2022/705 · Cited by 9
dos Santos, M. A. (2022) · Dados · doi:10.1590/dados.2023.66.2.287 · Cited by 15
Echo Tunnels: Polarized News Sharing Online Runs Narrow but Deep
Mok, L., Inzlicht, M., & Anderson, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22177 · Cited by 9
Does incentivization promote sharing “true” content online?
Kapoor, H., Rezaei, S., Gurjar, S., Tagat, A., George, D., Budhwar, Y., & Puthillam, A. (2023) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-120 · Cited by 12
Schmidt, F., Mangold, F., Stier, S., & Ulloa, R. (2024) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2024.2342983 · Cited by 9
Diffusion of multiple information: On information resilience and the power of segregation
Tabasso, N. (2019) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2019.09.003 · Cited by 8
Figeac, J., Smyrnaios, N., Salord, T., Cabanac, G., Fraisier, O., Ratinaud, P., & Seffusatti, F. (2020) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2019-0193 · Cited by 9
Fake news, disinformation and the democratic state
Richards, J. (2021) · Revista ICONO14 · doi:10.7195/ri14.v19i1.1611 · Cited by 9
Goyanes, M., & Škorić, M. M. (2021) · Mediterranean Politics · doi:10.1080/13629395.2021.1904349 · Cited by 13
#MeToo Social Media Engagement and Perceived Hypersensitivity in the Workplace
Smith, A. M., & Ortiz, R. (2021) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2021.1953091 · Cited by 9
Epistemic Responsibility, Rights and Duties During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Karimov, A. R., Lavazza, A., & Farina, M. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2077856 · Cited by 10
Platform Governance and the Rural-Urban Divide: Sellers’ Responses to Design ChangePreprint
Koo, W. W.-Y., & Eesley, C. E. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3691262 · Cited by 8
Surveying the Research on Fake News in Social Media: a Tale of Networks and Language.Preprint
Ruffo, G., Semeraro, A., Giachanou, A., & Rosso, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 9
«3D-модель» российской экономики
Chepurenko, A. Y. (2022) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2022-2-118-128 · Cited by 8
AI and Social Media: A Political Economy Perspective
Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Siderius, J. (2025) · doi:10.3386/w33892 · Cited by 9
Política, uso de medios y polarización afectiva en España
Crespo-Martínez, I., Melero-López, I., Mora-Rodríguez, A., & Rojo-Martínez, J.-M. (2024) · Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación · doi:10.14198/medcom.26681 · Cited by 8
Ackermann, K., & Stadelmann‐Steffen, I. (2022) · Swiss Political Science Review · doi:10.1111/spsr.12498 · Cited by 8
Chakraborty, S., Goyal, S., Rieder, A., Onuchowska, A., & Berndt, D. J. (2024) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114235 · Cited by 8
Alleviating negative group polarization with the aid of social bots
Wu, Y., Li, W., Li, Y., Chen, Q., Liu, M., & Li, Y. (2024) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2024.129804 · Cited by 8
Unmasking coordinated hate: Analysing hate speech on Spanish digital news media
Arce-García, S., Said-Hung, E., & Montero-Díaz, J. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241259715 · Cited by 12
Political Influencers and Their Social Media Audiences during the 2021 Arizona Audit
Rose, K., & Rohlinger, D. A. (2024) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231241259680 · Cited by 8
Human-automated collectives: Automating communication for social movement mobilization
Kwok, C. L., & Chan, N. K. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241251794 · Cited by 8
Zhang, Y., & Liu, J. (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24960 · Cited by 10
He, J., Gao, B., & Wang, Y.-T. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2423334 · Cited by 10
Fang, X., Heuser, S., & Stötzer, L. S. (2025) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105309 · Cited by 15
Modeling echo chamber effects in signed networks
Vendeville, A., & Diaz-Diaz, F. (2025) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.111.024302 · Cited by 8
Digital Shift in Swiss Media Consumption Practices
Reveilhac, M., & Morselli, D. (2020) · Swiss Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2478/sjs-2020-0026 · Cited by 8
A potential mechanism for low tolerance feedback loops in social media flagging systems
Westermann, C. J., & Coscia, M. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268270 · Cited by 8
A Formal Model for Polarization under Confirmation Bias in Social Networks
Alvim, M. S., Amorim, B., Knight, S., Quintero, S., & Valencia, F. (2023) · Logical Methods in Computer Science · doi:10.46298/lmcs-19(1:18)2023 · Cited by 11
Hespanhol, L. (2022) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwac037 · Cited by 9
Social Alignment Contagion in Online Social Networks
Mirlohi, A., Mahdavimoghaddam, J., Jovanović, J., Al-Obeidat, F. N., Khani, M., Ghorbani, A. A., & Bagheri, E. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2022.3226346 · Cited by 8
Does Social Media Use Promote Political Mass Polarization?
Ludwig, K., & Müller, P. (2022) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783748928232-118 · Cited by 10
Gherghina, S., & Marian, C. (2024) · Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe · doi:10.1080/25739638.2024.2319400 · Cited by 9
McKay, D., Makri, S., Lopez, M. G., Porlezza, C., MacFarlane, A., Cooper, G., & Missaoui, S. (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24885 · Cited by 8
Users Volatility on Reddit and Voat
Marco, N. D., Cinelli, M., Alipour, S., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3379318 · Cited by 11
Detecting Propaganda in News Articles Using Large Language Models
(2024) · Engineering Open Access · doi:10.33140/eoa.01.02.10 · Cited by 8
Recommender System: A Comprehensive Overview of Technical Challenges and Social Implications
An, Y., Tan, Y., Sun, X. J., & Ferrari, G. (2024) · ICCK Transactions on Sensing Communication and Control · doi:10.62762/tscc.2024.898503 · Cited by 8
The #tay4hottest100 new media event: discourse, publics and celebrity fandom as connective action
Fuller, G. (2017) · Communication Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/22041451.2017.1295221 · Cited by 8
Taking voice and taking sides: the role of social media commenting in solidarity contestation
Trenz, H., Brändle, V. K., Cinalli, M., & Eisele, O. (2020) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781789909500.00012 · Cited by 9
Waldis, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-28169-4_4 · Cited by 8
Betting on the underdog: the influence of social networks on vote choice
Fredén, A., Rheault, L., & Indridason, I. (2020) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2020.21 · Cited by 9
Correlations of social media performance and electoral results in Brazilian presidential elections
Brito, K. D. S., Meira, S. R. D. L., & Adeodato, P. J. L. (2021) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-210315 · Cited by 8
From Global Village to Identity Tribes: Context Collapse and the Darkest Timeline
Bastos, M. (2021) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v9i3.3930 · Cited by 10
Martínez, I. C., Martínez, J. M. R., Zapata, C. M., & Moreno, S. M. (2022) · Revista de Comunicación · doi:10.26441/rc21.1-2022-a6 · Cited by 10
Los medios bajo el prisma de la audiencia española: cuestión de confianza
Vázquez-Herrero, J., Negreira-Rey, M.-C., Rodríguez, A. S., & Vázquez, A. I. R. (2022) · Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico · doi:10.5209/esmp.77807 · Cited by 8
News Media, Inflation, and Sentiment
Macaulay, A., & Song, W. (2023) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.20231117 · Cited by 13
Recommender Systems: Legal and Ethical Issues
Genovesi, S., Kaesling, K., & Robbins, S. (2023) · The International library of ethics, law and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34804-4 · Cited by 10
Park, C., & Kaye, B. (2017) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305117717247 · Cited by 8
Personality Filters for Online News Interest and Engagement
Eg, R., & Krumsvik, A. H. (2019) · Nordicom review/NORDICOM review · doi:10.2478/nor-2019-0021 · Cited by 8
Die Macht des Kontextes: Sprache(n) und Kommunikation
Kostiučenko, A., & Kuhnhenn, M. (2022) · Peter Lang eBooks · doi:10.3726/b19559 · Cited by 8
Conformity in Scientific NetworksPreprint
Weatherall, J. O., & O’Connor, C. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3391343 · Cited by 7
MediaRank: Computational Ranking of Online News SourcesPreprint
Ye, J., & Skiena, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.07581 · Cited by 8
Social Learning Under Platform Influence: Consensus and Persistent DisagreementPreprint
Candogan, O., Immorlica, N., Light, B., & Anunrojwong, J. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3675712 · Cited by 8
Online Hate: Behavioural Dynamics and Relationship with MisinformationPreprint
Cinelli, M., Pelicon, A., Mozetič, I., Quattrociocchi, W., Novak, P. K., & Zollo, F. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.14005 · Cited by 8
An Adaptive Bounded-Confidence Model of Opinion Dynamics on NetworksPreprint
Kan, U., Feng, M., & Porter, M. A. (2021) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/gcxnf · Cited by 8
Reasoning with Recommender Systems? Practical Reasoning, Digital Nudging, and Autonomy
Bartmann, M. (2023) · The International library of ethics, law and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34804-4_7 · Cited by 7
Bogado, N., Coninck, D. D., Duque, M., & Schwartz, S. J. (2024) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2024.2312614 · Cited by 8
Evaluating Intelligence and Knowledge in Large Language Models
Bianchini, F. (2024) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-024-10072-5 · Cited by 10
de Bruin, K., de Haan, Y., Vliegenthart, R., & Kruikemeier, S. (2025) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2025.2495902 · Cited by 8
Misinformation Beyond Traditional Feeds: Evidence from a WhatsApp Deactivation Experiment in Brazil
Ventura, T., Majumdar, R., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2025) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/737172 · Cited by 12
The information cocoon paradox: fostering unity or fueling divergence?
Chen, S., Qiu, H., & He, W. P. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05169-0 · Cited by 9
Ren, J., Fu, X., Fan, T., & Lü, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2025.3593424 · Cited by 7
Theoretical Bases of Methods of Counteraction to Modern Forms of Information Warfare
Bakirov, A. S., & Suleimenov, I. E. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14100410 · Cited by 17
Social Identity Theory and Algorithmic Bias: Ingroup and Outgroup Acrophily in Recommender Systems
Carrasco-Farré, C., Grimaldi, D., Torrens, M., & Longobuco, E. (2025) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2025.2561382 · Cited by 10
Allen, L. K., DeLiema, D., & Kendeou, P. (2025) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2025.2588213 · Cited by 7
Hong, X., Pan, L., Xu, M., & Chen, Q. (2025) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-08-2024-0984 · Cited by 8
Freedom of the Press and Public Responsiveness
Hiaeshutter-Rice, D., Soroka, S., & Wlezien, C. B. (2019) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592719003852 · Cited by 7
Service Ecosystem: A Lens of Smart Digital Society
Xue, X., Feng, Z., Chen, S., Zhou, Z., Qin, C., Li, B., Wang, Z., Wang, S., Wu, H., Zhang, L., et al. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/scc53864.2021.00039 · Cited by 7
Metrics of News Audience Polarization: Same or Different?
Mangold, F., & Scharkow, M. (2022) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2022.2085249 · Cited by 7
Misinformation in India's 2019 National Election
Basavaraj, K. A. (2022) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2022.021 · Cited by 7
Realtime user ratings as a strategy for combatting misinformation: an experimental study
Stein, J., Frey, V., & van de Rijt, A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28597-x · Cited by 8
Genèse d’un autoritarisme numérique
Daucé, F., Loveluck, B., Musiani, F., & Bronnikova, O. (2023) · Presses des Mines eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.pressesmines.9023 · Cited by 10
Individuals, Collectives, and Individuals in Collectives: The Ineliminable Role of Dependence
Hahn, U. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231198479 · Cited by 11
The Digital Adaptation of International Bureaucracies
Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192859198.013.19 · Cited by 7
The Impact of Social Media on Political Polarization
Otieno, P. (2024) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.47941/jcomm.1686 · Cited by 7
Socializing the political: rethinking filter bubbles and social media with Hannah Arendt
Daus, Z. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09759-5 · Cited by 10
A Social Network Model for Analysis of Public Opinion Formation Process
Rabiee, H., Ladani, B. T., & Sahafizadeh, E. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3435908 · Cited by 7
Origin and Evolution of the News Finds Me Perception: Review of Theory and Effects
de Zúñiga, H. G., & Cheng, Z. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70231-0_10 · Cited by 10
Disengagement in the Digital Age: A Virtue Ethical Approach to Epistemic Sorting on Social Media
Worden, K. J. (2019) · Moral Philosophy and Politics · doi:10.1515/mopp-2018-0066 · Cited by 7
White Media Attitudes in the Trump Era
Thompson, J. (2020) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x20943566 · Cited by 8
Cognitive Confinement, Embodied Sense-Making, and the (De)Colonization of Knowledge
Werner, K. (2020) · Philosophical Papers · doi:10.1080/05568641.2020.1779603 · Cited by 7
Dimensions of the Relationship between the Individual and Her Unique Worldview Construction
Eidhamar, L. G. (2021) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel12030215 · Cited by 7
Can I Stick to My Guns? Motivated Reasoning and Biased Processing of Balanced Political Information
Brenes-Peralta, C., Wojcieszak, M., & Yphtach Lelkes, B. (2021) · Communication & Society · doi:10.15581/003.34.2.49-66 · Cited by 8
Data Sovereignty: New Challenges for Diplomacy
Rafik, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68647-5_3 · Cited by 7
Tong, C., Winckler, H., & Rojas, H. (2021) · Revista de Comunicación Política · doi:10.29105/rcp3-1 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 298-320
- ISSN
- 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5331
- OpenAlex
- W2303924600
- Cited by
- 1,992
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 166 · 2025: 177 · 2024: 174 · 2023: 213 · 2022: 277 · 2021: 256 · 2020: 251 · 2019: 228 · 2018: 146 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 18
- FWCI
- 436.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Public Opinion Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- filter bubbles, echo chambers, online news consumption, ideological segregation, ideological distance, social networks, search engines, web browsing history, political polarization, information exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
