The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption
Open accessAbstract
Online publishing, social networks, and web search have dramatically lowered the costs of producing, distributing, and discovering news articles. Some scholars argue that such technological changes increase exposure to diverse perspectives, while others worry that they increase ideological segregation. We address the issue by examining web-browsing histories for 50,000 US-located users who regularly read online news. We find that social networks and search engines are associated with an increase in the mean ideological distance between individuals. However, somewhat counterintuitively, these same channels also are associated with an increase in an individual’s exposure to material from his or her less preferred side of the political spectrum. Finally, the vast majority of online news consumption is accounted for by individuals simply visiting the home pages of their favorite, typically mainstream, news outlets, tempering the consequences—both positive and negative—of recent technological changes. We thus uncover evidence for both sides of the debate, while also finding that the magnitude of the effects is relatively modest.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is significant research on the ways in which algorithms produce search results that mirror people’s worldviews, but the majority of that work has been carried out on social networks [83,84].”
From Evolving Health Information–Seeking Behavior in the Context of Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Alexa: Interview Study Using the Think-Aloud Protocol (2025) · cites this paper as [84]
In the citing paper
“Web traffic data suggest that relatively few Americans have heavily skewed information diets15–18”
From Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Pese a que son numerosos los estudios basados en la polarización afectiva y los medios de comunicación (Stroud, 2010;Flaxman et al., 2016;Tsfati & Nir, 2017;Rojo-Martínez et al., 2023;Torcal, 2023), no son tan frecuentes aquellos que estudian el nivel de uso de diferentes medios de forma integrada, asumiendo la condición híbrida del sistema mediático, y analizan según esta el grado de polarización”
From Política, uso de medios y polarización afectiva en España (2024) · cites this paper as Flaxman et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Esta práctica cotidiana y hábito informativo convertiría a las sociedades occidentales menos tolerantes con aquellos puntos de vista opuestos a los propios (Jamieson y Capella, 2008) y con posiciones u opiniones más extremas, que devienen en una creciente polarización de la sociedad (Flaxman et al., 2016).”
From Homofilia, polarización afectiva y desinformación en Twitter. Caso de estudio sobre la crisis migratoria #Openarms (2021) · cites this paper as Flaxman et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with recent observational studies of online web browsing behavior which find that, with respect to political news, partisans di↵er in their typical media diet even as they do not completely retreat into echo chambers (see e.g., Peterson et al., ND, Flaxman et al., 2016, Guess, 2019).”
From Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information-Seeking Behavior: Motivated Reasoning or Cheerleading? (2019) · cites this paper as Flaxman et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“This also reaffirms the fact that the negative effects of echo chambers in social networks, which are known to arise due to high levels of homophily in communication, might be overstated”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Flaxman et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Del Vicario et al. [48] and Flaxman et al. [134] demonstrated that contentconsidering methods effectively detect echo chambers formed through selective content exposure.”
From A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [134]
In the citing paper
“Some studies observe reinforcement of this sort (92); others provide conflicting evidence in both magnitude and direction (93-96).”
From Misinformation in and about science (2021) · cites this paper as [94]
In the citing paper
“With the advent of the Internet, online media has become a widespread source of information and, subsequently, opinion formation5–9.”
From Negativity drives online news consumption (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cites
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. J. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,558
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597
Foundations of statistical natural language processing
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999) · Cited by 9,816
On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization
Liu, D. C., & Nocedal, J. M. (1989) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/bf01589116 · Cited by 9,062
(2011) · Cited by 4,430
Benkler, Y. R. (2017) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300127232 · Cited by 3,728
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160 · Cited by 3,245
Broder, A. (2002) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/792550.792552 · Cited by 1,944
Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x · Cited by 1,940
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,003
Mass Media Deploying Digital Personalization: An Empirical Investigation
Loebbecke, C., Oberschulte, F., & Boboschko, I. (2021) · The International Journal on Media Management · doi:10.1080/14241277.2022.2038605 · Cited by 7
Cardenal, A. S., Mas, M. V., Majó-Vázquez, S., & Lacasa-Mas, I. (2022) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2022.2090038 · Cited by 7
Recommender systems, ground truth, and preference pollution
Adomavičius, G., Bockstedt, J. C., Curley, S. P., & Zhang, J. (2022) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12055 · Cited by 9
Fake News Incidents through the Lens of the DCAM Disinformation Blueprint
Rapti, M., Tsakalidis, G., Petridou, S. G., & Vergidis, K. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13070306 · Cited by 10
DiversiNews: Surfacing Diversity in Online News
Trampuš, M., Fuart, F., Pighin, D., Štajner, T., Berčič, J., Novak, B., Rusu, D., Stopar, L., & Grobelnik, M. (2015) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v36i4.2528 · Cited by 7
Hynes, M. (2018) · Irish Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/0791603517741605 · Cited by 7
Are Biased Media Bad for Democracy?
Wolton, S. (2019) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12424 · Cited by 7
Role of the Website Structure in the Diversity of Browsing Behaviors
Morales, P. R., Tabourier, L., Ung, S., & Prieur, C. (2019) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/3342220.3343648 · Cited by 6
Social Media and Democracy in Crisis
Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198843498.003.0013 · Cited by 8
Fomento de la alfabetización de datos en todos los ámbitos
O’Neill, S. A. (2019) · Aula Abierta · doi:10.17811/rifie.48.4.2019.419-434 · Cited by 7
York, C., & Haridakis, P. M. (2020) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2020.1759096 · Cited by 7
Quantitative Modeling and Analysis of Argumentation Polarization in Cyber Argumentation
Sirrianni, J., Liu, X., & Adams, D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2020.3035228 · Cited by 7
There can be only one truth: Ideological segregation and online news communities in Ukraine
Urman, A., & Makhortykh, M. (2021) · Global Media and Communication · doi:10.1177/17427665211009930 · Cited by 7
From the Antenna to the Display Devices: Transformation of the Colombian Radio Industry
Rubio, A. B. (2021) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia2020012 · Cited by 7
YouTube and Traditional Media: Polarization in the Catalan Political Conflict
Marin, J. G. (2021) · Studies in digital politics and governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71815-2_3 · Cited by 7
Sender vs. recipient-orientated information systems revisited
MacFarlane, A., Missaoui, S., Makri, S., & Lopez, M. G. (2021) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-10-2020-0177 · Cited by 9
The Political Economy of New Media: Challenges and Opportunities Across Democracies and Autocracies
Sobbrio, F. (2018) · Journal of Development Perspectives · doi:10.5325/jdevepers.2.1-2.0049 · Cited by 8
Regulating algorithmic filtering on social mediaPreprint
Cen, S. H., & Shah, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.09647 · Cited by 11
Polarization in the Contemporary Political and Media LandscapePreprint
Wilson, A. E., Parker, V., & Feinberg, M. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yqvzc · Cited by 15
Construyendo bloques la promiscuidad política online en tiempos de polarización en España
Garmendia Madariaga, A., Lorenzo Rodríguez, J., & Riera, P. (2024) · Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas · doi:10.5477/cis/reis.178.61 · Cited by 9
Partisan selective exposure and politically polarized attitudes toward disruptive protest
Lorenzano, K. J., Moon, S. J., & Borah, P. (2023) · Communication and the Public · doi:10.1177/20570473231171460 · Cited by 7
Machine Learning and the Work of the User
Harper, R. H. R., & Randall, D. W. (2024) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-023-09483-6 · Cited by 6
Martínez‐España, R., Fernández-Pedauyé, J., de Lucía, J. G. P., Martínez, J. M. R., Bakdid, K., & Escribano, J. J. G. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3431999 · Cited by 6
Heavy users fail to fall into filter bubbles: evidence from a Chinese online video platform
Fu, C., Che, Q., Li, Z., Yuan, F., & Min, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1423851 · Cited by 8
Kumar, A., & Maurya, M. K. (2024) · Journal of Communication Inquiry · doi:10.1177/01968599241292623 · Cited by 10
van Hoof, M., Trilling, D., Möller, J. E., & Meppelink, C. S. (2024) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmae020 · Cited by 6
Zhang, C., Wang, X., Min, Y., Yu, S., Wu, Y., Xuan, Q., & Fu, C. (2025) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2025.130487 · Cited by 8
Unpacking media bias in the growing divide between cable and network news
Hosseinmardi, H., Wolken, S., Rothschild, D. M., & Watts, D. J. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-01046-7 · Cited by 10
News Use, Political Knowledge, and Misperceptions in 18 Countries across the Global North
Aelst, P. V., Gehle, L., Schemer, C., Strömbäck, J., & Zoizner, A. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009632430 · Cited by 6
‘It’s always there’: A study of the sources and motivations for Australian teens’ news consumption
Blakston, A., & Waller, L. J. (2022) · The Australian Journalism Review · doi:10.1386/ajr_00090_7 · Cited by 6
Few voices, strong echo: Measuring follower homogeneity of politicians’ Twitter accounts
Rusche, F. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221099860 · Cited by 6
The Deep State: Definitional Debates and Impacts
Dover, R. (2022) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781800378803.00020 · Cited by 6
Mackay, M., Huo, S., & Kaiser, M. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011349 · Cited by 6
Polarized opinion states in static networks driven by limited information horizons
Pérez-Martínez, H., Mingueza, F. B., Soriano‐Paños, D., Gómez‐Gardeñes, J., & Floría, L. M. (2023) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113917 · Cited by 6
Threats to Diversity of Opinion and Freedom of Expression via Social Media
Funta, R., & Ondria, P. (2023) · TalTech Journal of European Studies · doi:10.2478/bjes-2023-0014 · Cited by 6
Personality, networks, and heterogeneous discussion on Facebook
Boulianne, S., & galipeau, T. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2024.2340624 · Cited by 6
Oswald, L. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03115-0 · Cited by 6
Riva, G. M., & Barry, M. (2019) · Revista Publicum · doi:10.12957/publicum.2019.47199 · Cited by 6
Italian Populism and Fake News on the Internet: A New Political Weapon in the Public Discourse
Monti, M. (2020) · Challenges to democracy in the 21st century · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37401-3_9 · Cited by 6
Digitalization of Democratic Processes in Europe
(2021) · Studies in digital politics and governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71815-2 · Cited by 6
Social Paleontology on Twitter: A Case Study of Topic Archetypes, Network Composition, and Structure
Lundgren, L. M., Crippen, K. J., Bauer, J. E., & Bex, R. T. (2022) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051221080475 · Cited by 6
Hoti, A. H., Hoti, M. H., Hoti, H., & Salihu, A. (2022) · Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO) · doi:10.1109/meco55406.2022.9797147 · Cited by 6
Luzsa, R., Mayr, S., Syrmoudis, E., Großklags, J., Kuebler-Wachendorff, S., & Kranz, J. J. (2022) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3543758.3543762 · Cited by 6
Please stop trying to predict elections only with Twitter
Brito, K. D. S., Filho, R. L. C. S., & Adeodato, P. J. L. (2022) · Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3543434.3543648 · Cited by 6
Echo Chambers or Doom Scrolling? Homophily, Intensity, and Exposure to Elite Social Media Messages
Haselswerdt, J., & Fine, J. A. (2023) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129231202969 · Cited by 8
Gjerazi, B., & Skana, P. (2023) · Balkan Social Science Review · doi:10.46763/bssr232222365g · Cited by 6
Beyond partisan filters: Can underreported news reduce issue polarization?
Bram, C. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297808 · Cited by 6
Optimal Engagement-Diversity Tradeoffs in Social Media
Baumann, F., Halpern, D., Procaccia, A. D., Rahwan, I., Shapira, I., & Wüthrich, M. (2024) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3589334.3645713 · Cited by 6
Exploring the effectiveness of virtual reality in combating misinformation on climate change
Erişen, E., Yildirim, F., Duran, E., Şar, B., & Kalkan, I. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13057 · Cited by 7
(Un)documented immigrant media makers and the search for connection online
Bishop, S. C. (2017) · Critical Studies in Media Communication · doi:10.1080/15295036.2017.1351618 · Cited by 7
Der Wert der Musik: Aushandlungsdynamiken in der digitalisierten Musikwirtschaft
Kropf, J. (2017) · kommunikation gesellschaft · doi:10.15460/kommges.2017.18.1.590 · Cited by 6
Recommender Systems in der populären Musik
Kropf, J. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-21165-3_6 · Cited by 7
Zakaria, T., Busro, B., & Furqon, S. (2018) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/434/1/012280 · Cited by 6
Articulación de la influencia en Twitter ante el anuncio de la Ley del referéndum en Cataluña
Fernández, C. M. M., Grau-Masot, J.-M., & Capdevila, A. (2019) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2019.may.20 · Cited by 6
ECHO CHAMBERS DI DUNIA MAYA: TANTANGAN BARU KOMUNIKASI ANTAR UMAT BERAGAMA
Yahya, Y. K., & Mahmudah, U. (2019) · RELIGI JURNAL STUDI AGAMA-AGAMA · doi:10.14421/rejusta.2019.1502-02 · Cited by 6
The Promise and Perils of Voice
Moy, P. (2020) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqz049 · Cited by 6
Person- and situation-specific factors in discounting science via scientific impotence excuses
Rosman, T., Kerwer, M., Chasiotis, A., & Wedderhoff, O. (2021) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.3735 · Cited by 6
Mace, M., & Schwalbe, C. B. (2020) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2020.1799238 · Cited by 6
Hwang, T. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.012 · Cited by 12
An Analysis of Fake Narratives on Social Media during 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election
The Ministry of Communication and Informatics of the Republic of Indonesia, Rumata, V. M., Nugraha, F. K., & Indonesia indicator, I. (2020) · Jurnal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of Communication · doi:10.17576/jkmjc-2020-3604-22 · Cited by 6
Populism in an Identity Framework: A Feedback Model
Reveilhac, M., & Morselli, D. (2021) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtab003 · Cited by 6
An Impact Evaluation Framework of Personalized News Aggregation and Recommendation Systems
Zhao, Y., Wang, C., Han, H., Shu, M., & Wang, W. (2020) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) · doi:10.1109/wiiat50758.2020.00136 · Cited by 6
Digital Religion and Global Media: Flows, Communities, and Radicalizations
Tsuria, R., & Yadlin‐Segal, A. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32103-5_10 · Cited by 6
Crowd control: Reducing individual estimation bias by sharing biased social information
Jayles, B., Sire, C., & Kurvers, R. H. J. M. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009590 · Cited by 10
Lacić, E., Fadljević, L., Weissenboeck, F., Lindstaedt, S., & Kowald, D. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99739-7_20 · Cited by 6
Fear and Loathing in American Politics
Iyengar, S. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.028 · Cited by 7
Using Visualizations to Encourage Blind-Spot Exploration.
Kumar, J., & Tintarev, N. (2018) · Cited by 6
Digital campaigning in Karnataka
Basavaraj, K. A. (2022) · South Asian History and Culture · doi:10.1080/19472498.2022.2058172 · Cited by 6
Soziologie der Online-Kommunikation
Beck, K., & Jünger, J. (2018) · Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-18017-1_2-1 · Cited by 7
Campante, F. R., Durante, R., & Tesei, A. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29230 · Cited by 6
Lack of evidence for correlation between COVID-19 infodemic and vaccine acceptancePreprint
Valensise, C. M., Cinelli, M., Nadini, M., Galeazzi, A., Peruzzi, A., Etta, G., Zollo, F., Baronchelli, A., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.07946 · Cited by 18
Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscapePreprint
Wilson, A. E., Parker, V., & Feinberg, M. (2020) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ebp3z · Cited by 8
Algorithmic Recommendations and Earned Media: Investigating Product Echo Chambers on YouTubePreprint
Lambrecht, A., Sen, A., Tucker, C. E., & Wiertz, C. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3951425 · Cited by 6
Smuha, N. A. (2021) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4093683 · Cited by 5
Privacy and Polarization: An Inference-Based FrameworkPreprint
Bondi, T., Rafieian, O., & Yao, A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4641822 · Cited by 6
Atheism, Social Networks and Health: A Review and Theoretical Model
McCaffree, K. (2019) · Secularism and Nonreligion · doi:10.5334/snr.101 · Cited by 5
Onitiu, D. (2021) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01235-8 · Cited by 6
Unveiling the drivers of active participation in social media discourse
Baqir, A., Chen, Y., Diaz-Diaz, F., Kiyak, S., Louf, T., Morini, V., Pansanella, V., Torricelli, M., & Galeazzi, A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-88117-x · Cited by 5
Khatiwada, P., Halko, L., Syed, N., Mahesh, A., Alvanpour, A., & Mauriello, M. L. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3711071 · Cited by 7
Consumer Psychology in Functional Beverages: From Nutritional Awareness to Habit Formation
Alalwan, T. A. (2025) · Beverages · doi:10.3390/beverages11050126 · Cited by 7
Mosleh, M., Allen, J. N. L., & Rand, D. G. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2425739122 · Cited by 7
Marino‐Jiménez, M., Rodrich‐Portugal, R., & Zapata-Vásquez, M. (2025) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2025.2584871 · Cited by 6
Shamir, A., Oser, J. L., & Grinberg, N. (2023) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612231213291 · Cited by 5
Anzum, F., Asha, A. Z., Dey, L., Gavrilov, A., Iffath, F., Ohi, A. Q., Pond, L., Shopon, M., & Gavrilova, M. L. (2024) · Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-8127-1.ch001 · Cited by 5
The Effects of Media Bias on News Recommendations
Ruan, Q., Namee, B. M., & Dong, R. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3413772 · Cited by 5
Lavorgna, A., & Corda, A. (2024) · International Criminology · doi:10.1007/s43576-024-00134-4 · Cited by 8
Post-hoc Evaluation of Nodes Influence in Information Cascades: The Case of Coordinated Accounts
Marco, N. D., Brunetti, S., Cinelli, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2024) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3700644 · Cited by 8
Partisan temporal selective news avoidance: Evidence from online trace data
Heseltine, M., Barnehl, H.-M., & Wojcieszak, M. (2025) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12944 · Cited by 7
Vaughan, M., Vromen, A., & Martin, F. R. (2018) · Media International Australia · doi:10.1177/1329878x18782998 · Cited by 5
Paving the way for regulation: how the case against Facebook stacked up
Andrade, D. Q. (2019) · Observatorio (OBS*) · doi:10.15847/obsobs13320191388 · Cited by 5
World religion and fake news: A pedagogical response in an age of post‐truth
Shoemaker, T. D. (2019) · Teaching Theology & Religion · doi:10.1111/teth.12504 · Cited by 5
Wessels, J. (2020) · Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research · doi:10.1386/jammr_00008_1 · Cited by 5
Borah, P. (2021) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-10-2020-0443 · Cited by 5
ЧЕРНЫШ, М. Ф. (2021) · Informacionno-analitičeskij bûlletenʹ (INAB) · doi:10.19181/inab.2021.4.1 · Cited by 5
Chang, S.-Y., Bodolica, V., Hsu, H.-H., & Lu, H. (2022) · Eurasian economic review : · doi:10.1007/s40821-022-00221-4 · Cited by 5
Macková, A., Novotná, M., Čejková, L., & Hrbková, L. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2023.2202650 · Cited by 7
Social media use and polarized redistributive attitudes: a comparative and causal perspective
Jung, H., & Lee, S. (2023) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2023.2214597 · Cited by 5
NewsSlant: Analyzing Political News and Its Influence Through a Moral Lens
Haque, A., & Singh, M. P. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2023.3341910 · Cited by 5
Wojcieszak et al No Polarization from Partisan News IJPP Forthcoming
Wojcieszak, M., de Leeuw, S. E., Menchen-Trevino, E., Lee, S., Huang-Isherwood, K. M., & Weeks, B. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/hqmuy · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 298-320
- ISSN
- 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5331
- OpenAlex
- W2303924600
- Cited by
- 1,992
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 166 · 2025: 177 · 2024: 174 · 2023: 213 · 2022: 277 · 2021: 256 · 2020: 251 · 2019: 228 · 2018: 146 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 18
- FWCI
- 436.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Public Opinion Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- filter bubbles, echo chambers, online news consumption, ideological segregation, ideological distance, social networks, search engines, web browsing history, political polarization, information exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
