Cited by 265Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchProtein purification and stabilityBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods

Reduced elimination of IgG antibodies by engineering the variable region

Igawa, T., Tsunoda, H., Tachibana, T., Maeda, A., Mimoto, F., Moriyama, C., Nanami, M., Sekimori, Y. +3 more·2010·Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Abstract

Fc engineering to increase the binding affinity of IgG antibodies to FcRn has been reported to reduce the elimination of IgG antibodies. Herein, we present a novel non-FcRn-dependent approach to reduce the elimination of IgG antibodies. Pharmacokinetic studies conducted in normal mice of various humanized IgG4 antibodies, which had identical constant regions but different variable region sequences, revealed that an antibody with a lower isoelectric point (pI) has a longer half-life. These antibodies exhibited comparable binding affinity to FcRn, and with the antibodies with lower pIs, a longer half-life was also observed in beta2-microglobulin knockout mice, suggesting that differences in the pharmacokinetics were due to a non-FcRn-dependent mechanism. On the basis of our findings, we attempted to engineer the pharmacokinetic properties of a humanized anti-IL6 receptor IgG1 antibody. Selected substitutions in the variable region, without substitution in the Fc region, lowered the pI but did not reduce the biological activity and showed a significant reduction in the clearance of the antibody in cynomolgus monkey. These results suggest that lowering the pI by engineering the variable region could reduce the elimination of IgG antibodies and could provide an alternative to Fc engineering of IgG antibodies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/protein/gzq009

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Almagro, 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library, 13, 1619
  2. Devenny, 1985, Microcirculation, endothelium, and lymphatics, 2, 15
  3. Kobayashi, 1999, Cancer Research, 59, 422
  4. Onda, 2001, Cancer Research, 61, 5070

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Igawa, T., Tsunoda, H., Tachibana, T., Maeda, A., Mimoto, F., Moriyama, C., Nanami, M., Sekimori, Y., Nabuchi, Y., Aso, Y., & Hattori, K.
Affiliations
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Japan) (JP)
Venue
Protein Engineering Design and Selection
Published
2010-02-15
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
385-392
ISSN
  • 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0126
  • 1741-0134
OpenAlex
W2104198642
Cited by
265
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
FWCI
10.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Protein Engineering Design and Selection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Keywords
antibody half-life, isoelectric point, humanized monoclonal antibody, IgG4 antibodies, pharmacokinetics, Macaca fascicularis, antibody clearance
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Cricetulus, Genetic Engineering, Half-Life, Cricetinae, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin Variable Region, Isoelectric Point, Receptors, Fc, Protein Engineering, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, CHO Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review