The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prices, Plant Size, and Product Quality
Abstract
Drawing on uncommonly rich and representative data from the Colombian manufacturing census, this paper documents new empirical relationships between input prices, output prices, and plant size and proposes a model of endogenous input and output quality choices by heterogeneous firms to explain the observed patterns. The key empirical facts are that, on average within narrowly defined sectors, (1) larger plants charge more for their outputs and (2) larger plants pay more for their material inputs. The latter fact generalizes the well-known positive correlation between plant size and wages. Similar correlations hold between prices and export status. We show that the empirical patterns are consistent with a parsimonious extension of the Melitz (2003 , "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity, " Econometrica, 71, 1695--1725) framework to include endogenous choice of input and output quality. Using a measure of the scope for quality differentiation from Sutton (1998 , Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History. Cambridge: MIT Press), we show that differences across sectors in the relationships between prices and plant size are consistent with our model. Available evidence suggests that differences in observable measures of market power do not provide a complete explanation for the empirical patterns. We interpret the results as supportive of the hypothesis that quality differences of both inputs and outputs play an important role in generating the price--plant size correlations. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms
Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282804322970814 · Cited by 4,030
Plants and Productivity in International Trade
Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., & Kortum, S. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803769206296 · Cited by 2,980
Javorcik, B. S. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828041464605 · Cited by 2,950
Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics
Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (1999) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s1573-4463(99)03004-7 · Cited by 1,628
Bustos, P. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.1.304 · Cited by 1,552 · cited 2×
“This variant is also related to several recent papers that posit a fixed cost of innovation and/or increasing productivity in a Melitz-type context, without focusing on product quality: Bustos (2011), Costantini and Melitz (2008), Lileeva and Trefler (2010), and Aw, Roberts and Xu (2011).”
BackgroundMultiple-Product Firms and Product Switching
Bernard, A. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.1.70 · Cited by 904
Improved Access to Foreign Markets Raises Plant-Level Productivity… for Some Plants *
Lileeva, A., & Trefler, D. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1051 · Cited by 879
Exports, Export Destinations, and Skills
Brambilla, I., Lederman, D., & Porto, G. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.7.3406 · Cited by 353
Research works printed but not linked: 53
- 1996, ANNALES DECONOMIE ET DE STATISTIQUE, 41/42, 299
- 2007, The American economic review, 97, 916, 10.1257/aer.97.3.916 · DOI · Paper page
- 2003, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1375, 10.1162/003355303322552829 · DOI · Paper page
- Aw, 1998, The World Bank Economic Review, 12, 59, 10.1093/wber/12.1.59 · DOI
- 2001, 54, 149, 10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00083-0 · doi:10.1016/s0022-1996(00)00083-0
- 2007, THE WORLD ECONOMY, 14, 83
- 2011, The American economic review, 101, 1344
- 2011, AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL MICROECONOMICS, 3, 60, 10.1257/mic.3.2.60 · DOI · Paper page
- 1984, 14, 323, 10.1016/0304-3878(84)90062-2 · doi:10.1016/0304-3878(84)90062-2
- 2007, The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association, 21, 177, 10.1257/jep.21.3.177 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, 82, 99, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, 47, 1, 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00027-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 1997, The American economic review, 87, 520
- 1989, Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1027, 10.1086/261642 · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, 77, 265, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.01.011 · DOI
- 1992, The American economic review, 82, 773
- 2009, 77, 1165, 10.3982/ECTA7636 · DOI · Paper page
- 1988, The American economic review, 78, 418
- 2010, The Review of Economic Studies, 77, 188, 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00573.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, 75, 333, 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 2006, IMF STAFF PAPERS, 53, 58, 10.2307/30036022 · DOI
- 2009, The review of economics and statistics, 92, 378, 10.1162/rest.2010.11470 · doi:10.1162/rest.2010.11470
- 2008, The American economic review, 98, 394, 10.1257/aer.98.1.394 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 1727, 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1727 · DOI · Paper page
- 1991, The review of economics and statistics, 73, 318, 10.2307/2109523 · DOI
- 2000, The American economic review, 90, 1255, 10.1257/aer.90.5.1255 · doi:10.1257/aer.90.5.1255
- 2006, 68, 238, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 2011, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 417, 10.1093/qje/qjq003 · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 15, 574, 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2007.00668.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9396.2007.00668.x
- 2008, The Rand journal of economics, 39, 329, 10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00017.x · DOI
- 2005, The American economic review, 95, 704, 10.1257/0002828054201396 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Journal of Political Economy, 112, 1384, 10.1086/422562 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 27, 403, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, The Review of Economic Studies, 77, 1450, 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2010.00602.x · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 551, 10.2307/2118400 · DOI · Paper page
- 2006, 80, 444, 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS, 99, 501, 10.1257/aer.99.2.501 · doi:10.1257/aer.99.2.501
- 1997, The American economic review, 87, 642
- 2003, ECONOMETRICA, 71, 1695, 10.1111/1468-0262.00467 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, The Review of Economic Studies, 75, 295, 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00463.x · DOI · Paper page
- 1990, The American economic review, 80, 511
- 1999, 48, 7, 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00009-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 1996, ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 106, 458, 10.2307/2235260 · DOI
- 1996, 40, 921
- SATTINGER, 1979, Oxford Economic Papers, 31, 60, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041437 · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041437
- 2007, 72, 52, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 647, 10.1162/0033553041382201 · DOI · Paper page
- 1982, The Review of Economic Studies, 49, 3, 10.2307/2297136 · DOI · Paper page
- 1983, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 659, 10.2307/1881782 · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 117, 469F, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02119.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, The review of economics and statistics, 86, 534, 10.1162/003465304323031094 · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, 55, 197, 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00308.x · DOI
- 2008, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 489, 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.489 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Bustos, P. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.1.304 · Cited by 1,552
Prices, Markups, and Trade Reform
De Loecker, J., Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K., & Pavcnik, N. (2016) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta11042 · Cited by 985
Multiple-Product Firms and Product Switching
Bernard, A. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.1.70 · Cited by 904
Import Competition and Quality Upgrading
Amiti, M., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2013) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00271 · Cited by 530
Intermediate input imports and innovations: Evidence from Chinese firms' patent filings
Liu, Q., & Qiu, L. D. (2016) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.09.009 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Kugler, M., & Verhoogen, E.
- Venue
- The Review of Economic Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11-17
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 307-339
- ISSN
- 0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-937X
- OpenAlex
- W2103468194
- Cited by
- 814
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 123.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prices, Plant Size, and Product Quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/restud/rdr021
- The paper
- Kugler, M., & Verhoogen, E. (2012). Prices, Plant Size, and Product Quality. The Review of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdr021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.