Cited by 125Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Emotion regulation in spider phobia: role of the medial prefrontal cortex

Open access
Hermann, Andrea, Schäfer, Axel, Walter, Bertram, Stark, Rudolf, Vaitl, Dieter, Schienle, Anne·2009·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Phobic responses are strong emotional reactions towards phobic objects, which can be described as a deficit in the automatic regulation of emotions. Difficulties in the voluntary cognitive control of these emotions suggest a further phobia-specific deficit in effortful emotion regulation mechanisms. The actual study is based on this emotion regulation conceptualization of specific phobias. The aim is to investigate the neural correlates of these two emotion regulation deficits in spider phobics. Sixteen spider phobic females participated in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study in which they were asked to voluntarily up- and down-regulate their emotions elicited by spider and generally aversive pictures with a reappraisal strategy. In line with the hypothesis concerning an automatic emotion regulation deficit, increased activity in the insula and reduced activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex was observed. Furthermore, phobia-specific effortful regulation within phobics was associated with altered activity in medial prefrontal cortex areas. Altogether, these results suggest that spider phobic subjects are indeed characterized by a deficit in the automatic as well as the effortful regulation of emotions elicited by phobic compared with aversive stimuli. These two forms of phobic emotion regulation deficits are associated with altered activity in different medial prefrontal cortex subregions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsp013

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ventral PFC is known to provide top-down, inhibitory control of the amygdala in the effective regulation of fear.

    “The ventral PFC is known to provide top-down, inhibitory control of the amygdala in the effective regulation of fear (Gold et al., 2015; Hermann et al., 2009; Phelps et al., 2004; Wager et al., 2008).”

    From Advancing the treatment of anxiety disorders in transition‐age youth: a review of the therapeutic effects of unconscious exposure. (2025) · cites this paper as Hermann et al., 2009

    The Introduction proposes that ventral PFC regions regulate emotional responses by modulating the amygdala, and the Effortful down-regulation section describes a proposed pathway through ventromedial PFC regions. But that section reports no observed down-regulation of amygdala activity, so this study does not establish the claimed top-down inhibitory control during effective fear regulation. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The VBE effect of reducing phobic avoidance was mediated by activation of ventral medial PFC (d=.70) and frontostriatal regions (dACC, pre-motor regions; d=.70).

    “this VBE effect of reducing phobic avoidance was mediated by: (1) activation of the ventral medial PFC (d=.70), which supports emotion regulation in spider phobia (Hermann et al., 2009) and the retention of extinction learning (Phelps, Delgado, Nearing & LeDoux, 2004); and (2) activation of frontostriatal regions (dACC, pre-motor regions; d=.70).”
  • More studies have recently attempted to examine reappraisal of phobogenic stimuli in phobic populations or social stimuli in populations characterized by unstable social relationships, such as borderline personality disorder.

    “More studies have attempted to do this recently with work examining reappraisal of phobogenic stimuli in phobic populations (Hermann et al. 2009) or social stimuli in populations characterized by unstable social relationships, such as borderline personality disorder (Koenigsberg et al. 2009).”

    From Cognitive Reappraisal of Emotion: A Meta-Analysis of Human Neuroimaging Studies (2014) · cites this paper as Hermann et al. 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
  2. Campbell-Sills, L., Barlow, D. H. (2007). Incorporating emotion regulation into conceptualizations and treatments of anxiety and mood disorders. In: Gross, J. J., editor. Handbook of Emotion Regulation. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 542-59.
  3. Dilger, S., Straube, T., Mentzel, H.-J., et al. (2003). Brain activation to phobia-related pictures in spider phobic humans: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Letters, 348, 29-32.
  4. Foa, E. B., Huppert, J. D., Cahill, S. P. (2006). Emotional processing theory: an update. In: Rothbaum, B. O., editor. Pathological Anxiety: Emotional Processing in Etiology and Treatment. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 3-24.
  5. Foa, E. B., Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: exposure to corrective information. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 20-35.
  6. Gross, J. J., Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: conceptual foundations. In: Gross, J. J., editor. Handbook of Emotion Regulation. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 3-24.
  7. John, O., Gross, J. J. (2007). Individual differences in emotion regulation. In: Gross, J. J., editor. Handbook of Emotion Regulation. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 351-72.
  8. Johnstone, T., van Reekum, C. M., Urry, H. L., Kalin, N. H., Davidson, R. J. (2007). Failure to regulate: counterproductive recruitment of top- down prefrontal-subcortical circuitry in major depression. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 8877-84.
  9. Linehan, M. M., Bohus, M., Lynch, T. R. (2007). Dialectical behavior therapy for pervasive emotion dysregulation: theoretical and practical underpinnings. In: Gross, J. J., editor. Handbook of Emotion Regulation. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 581-605.
  10. Margraf, J. (1994). Diagnostic short-interview for mental disorders. Mini DIPS [Diagnostisches Kurz-Interview bei psychischen Sto ¨rungen. Mini DIPS]. Berlin. Heidelberg: Springer.
  11. Milad, M. R., Rauch, S. L. (2006). The orbitofrontal cortex and anxiety disorders. In: Zald, D. H., Rauch, S. L., editors. The Orbitofrontal Cortex. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 523-44.
  12. Milad, M. R., Rauch, S. L. (2007a). The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in anxiety disorders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1121, 546-61.
  13. Ochsner, K. N., Gross, J. J. (2007). The neural architecture of emotion regulation. In: Gross, J. J., editor. Handbook of Emotion Regulation. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 87-109.
  14. Quirk, G. J. (2007). Prefrontal-amygdala interactions in the regulation of fear. In: Gross, J. J., editor. Handbook of Emotion Regulation. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 27-46.
  15. Schienle, A., Scha ¨fer, A., Walter, B., Stark, R., Vaitl, D. (2005). Brain activation of spider phobics towards disorder-relevant, generally disgust-and fear-inducing pictures. Neuroscience Letters, 388, 1-6.
  16. Urry, H. L., van Reekum, C. M., Johnstone, T., et al. (2006). Amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex are inversely coupled during regulation of negative affect and predict the diurnal pattern of cortisol secretion among older adults. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 4415-25.
  17. Worsley, K. J. (2001). Statistical analysis of activation images. In: Jezzard, P., Matthews, P. M., Smith, S. M., editors. Functional MRI: An Introduction to Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 251-70.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hermann, A., Schäfer, A., Walter, B., Stark, R., Vaitl, D., & Schienle, A.
Affiliations
University of Graz (AT)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2009-04-27
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
257-267
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2116867690
Cited by
125
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
spider phobia, emotion regulation, medial prefrontal cortex, cognitive reappraisal, automatic emotion regulation, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, insula, specific phobia
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuronal Plasticity, Oxygen, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Phobic Disorders, Photic Stimulation, Psychophysics, Self Concept, Spiders, Reflex, Startle, Prefrontal Cortex, Expressed Emotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review