Cited by 362Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Psychopaths know right from wrong but don’t care

Open access
Cima, Maaike, Tonnaer, Franca, Hauser, Marc D.·2010·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Adult psychopaths have deficits in emotional processing and inhibitory control, engage in morally inappropriate behavior, and generally fail to distinguish moral from conventional violations. These observations, together with a dominant tradition in the discipline which sees emotional processes as causally necessary for moral judgment, have led to the conclusion that psychopaths lack an understanding of moral rights and wrongs. We test an alternative explanation: psychopaths have normal understanding of right and wrong, but abnormal regulation of morally appropriate behavior. We presented psychopaths with moral dilemmas, contrasting their judgments with age- and sex-matched (i) healthy subjects and (ii) non-psychopathic, delinquents. Subjects in each group judged cases of personal harms (i.e. requiring physical contact) as less permissible than impersonal harms, even though both types of harms led to utilitarian gains. Importantly, however, psychopaths' pattern of judgments on different dilemmas was the same as those of the other subjects. These results force a rejection of the strong hypothesis that emotional processes are causally necessary for judgments of moral dilemmas, suggesting instead that psychopaths understand the distinction between right and wrong, but do not care about such knowledge, or the consequences that ensue from their morally inappropriate behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsp051

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Huebner, B., Pettit, P., Hauser, M.D. (in review). When are means-based harms morally permissible? Folk intuitions confirm the philosophical significance of Pareto considerations. Mind and Language.
  2. Mikhail, J. (2009). Rawls' Linguistic Analogy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Pham, T.H., Philippot, P., Rime, B. (2000). Subjective and autonomic responses to emotion induction in psychopaths. Encephale, 26(1), 45-51.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cima, M., Tonnaer, F., & Hauser, M. D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2010-01-06
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
59-67
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2130562555
Cited by
362
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 13
FWCI
26.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (451-05-020)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
psychopathy, moral judgment, ethical dilemmas, emotional processing, inhibitory control, moral regulation, utilitarianism, delinquents
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Behavior, Decision Making, Emotions, Humans, Judgment, Male, Morals, Psychological Tests, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review