The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrated Psychological Therapy (IPT) for Schizophrenia: Is It Effective?
Open accessAbstract
Against the background of evidence-based treatments for schizophrenia, nowadays the implementation of specific cognitive and behavioral interventions becomes more important in the standard care of these patients. Over the past 25 years, research groups in 9 countries have carried out 30 independent evaluations of Integrated Psychological Therapy (IPT), a group program that combines neurocognitive and social cognitive interventions with social skills approaches for schizophrenic patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of IPT under varying treatment and research conditions in academic and nonacademic sites. In a first step, all 30 published IPT studies with the participation of 1393 schizophrenic patients were included in the meta-analysis. In a second step, only high-quality studies (HQS) (7 studies including 362 patients) were selected and analyzed to check whether they confirmed the results of the first step. Positive mean effect sizes favoring IPT over control groups (placebo-attention conditions, standard care) were found for all dependent variables, including symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and neurocognition. Moreover, the superiority of IPT continued to increase during an average follow-up period of 8.1 months. IPT obtained similarly favorable effects across the different outcome domains, assessment formats (expert ratings, self-reports, and psychological tests), settings (inpatient vs outpatient and academic vs nonacademic), and phases of treatment (acute vs chronic). The HQS confirmed the results of the complete sample. The analysis indicates that IPT is an effective rehabilitation approach for schizophrenia that is robust across a wide range of patients and treatment conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental disorders
Marshall, M., & Lockwood, A. (1998) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001089 · Cited by 589
RetractedThe Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Howel, D., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533295 · Cited by 3,642
Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.
Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.32.9.752 · Cited by 2,154
Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS
Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., & Heaton, R. K. (2004) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.009 · Cited by 1,422
Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia
Nuechterlein, K. H., Barch, D. M., Gold, J. M., Goldberg, T. E., Green, M. F., & Heaton, R. K. (2004) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.007 · Cited by 1,304
A Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Second-Generation Antipsychotics
Davis, J. M., Chen, N., & Glick, I. D. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.6.553 · Cited by 1,034
PILLING, S., BEBBINGTON, P., KUIPERS, E., GARETY, P., GEDDES, J., ORBACH, G., & MORGAN, C. (2002) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291702005895 · Cited by 887 · cited 2×
“A rush to judgment on social skills training: a comment on Pilling et al. 2002.. Psychol Med.”
BackgroundMethodKeefe, R. S. E., Silva, S. G., Perkins, D. O., & Lieberman, J. A. (1999) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033374 · Cited by 693
Cited by
A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia
McGurk, S. R., Twamley, E. W., Sitzer, D. I., McHugo, G. J., & Mueser, K. T. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060906 · Cited by 1,214
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
Song, F., Parekh, Hooper, L., Loke, Y., Ryder, J., Sutton, A., Hing, C., Kwok, C., Pang, C., & Harvey, I. (2010) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta14080 · Cited by 1,039
Drake, R. J., Day, C. J., Picucci, R., Warburton, J., Larkin, W., Husain, N., Reeder, C., Wykes, T., & Marshall, M. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291713002559 · Cited by 58
Acheson, D. T., Twamley, E. W., & Young, J. W. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00103 · Cited by 26
Rakitzi, S., Georgila, P., Efthimiou, K., & Mueller, D. R. (2016) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.05.039 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Roder, V.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-08-18
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- Supplement 1
- Pages
- S81-S93
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- OpenAlex
- W2151763900
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated Psychological Therapy (IPT) for Schizophrenia: Is It Effective? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/schbul/sbl021
- The paper
- Roder, V. (2006). Integrated Psychological Therapy (IPT) for Schizophrenia: Is It Effective? Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbl021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.