The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Neuroscience-Based Approaches to Measuring and Improving Treatment Effects on Cognition in Schizophrenia: The CNTRICS Initiative
Open accessAbstract
The goal of this article is to discuss ways to further improve the search for potentially procognitive agents that could be used to enhance cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia. In particular, we focus on the potential advantages to this process of using a contemporary, cognitive neuroscience-based approach to measuring cognitive function in clinical trials of procognitive agents in schizophrenia. These tools include computer-administered tasks that measure specific cognitive systems (such as attention, working memory, long-term memory, cognitive control) as well as the component cognitive processes that comprise these more overarching systems. The advantages of using these tools include the ability to identify and use homologous animal and human models in the drug discovery and testing process and the ability to incorporate noninvasive functional imaging measures into clinical trial contexts at several different phases of the drug development process. However, despite the clear potential advantages to using such methods, a number of barriers exist to their translation from basic science tools to tools for drug discovery. We discuss the development and implementation of a new project, Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia, designed to identify and overcome these barriers to the translation of cognitive neuroscience measures and methods into regular use in the drug discovery and development process of cognition-enhancing agents for use in schizophrenia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?
Baddeley, A. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2 · Cited by 7,359
What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia?
(1996) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.153.3.321 · Cited by 3,516
The role of acetylcholine in learning and memory
Hasselmo, M. E. (2006) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.09.002 · Cited by 1,693
The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex
Seamans, J. K., & Yang, C. R. (2004) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.05.006 · Cited by 1,592
Working Memory: The Multiple-Component Model
Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999) · Models of Working Memory · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174909.005 · Cited by 1,374
Dickinson, D., Ramsey, M. E., & Gold, J. M. (2007) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.532 · Cited by 863
Chudasama, Y., & Robbins, T. W. (2006) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.01.005 · Cited by 484
The cognitive neuroscience of schizophrenia.
Barch, D. M. (2005) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143959 · Cited by 437
Self-citationLewis, D., Volk, D., & Hashimoto, T. (2004) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-003-1673-x · Cited by 253
White matter volume predicts reaction time instability
Walhovd, K. B., & Fjell, A. M. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.022 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Fett, A.-K. J., Viechtbauer, W., Dominguez, M.-D.-G., Penn, D. L., van Os, J., & Krabbendam, L. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.001 · Cited by 1,833
Millan, M. J., Agid, Y., Brüne, M., Bullmore, E. T., Carter, C. S., Clayton, N. S., Connor, R., Davis, S., Deakin, B., DeRubeis, R. J., et al. (2012) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3628 · Cited by 1,292
Self-citationNeurocognition in first-episode schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review.
Mesholam-Gately, R. I., Giuliano, A. J., Goff, K. P., Faraone, S. V., & Seidman, L. J. (2009) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0014708 · Cited by 1,130
The Neural Bases of Distraction and Reappraisal
McRae, K., Hughes, B., Chopra, S., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Gross, J. J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21243 · Cited by 642
Research Domain Criteria: cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior
Morris, S. E., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2012) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2012.14.1/smorris · Cited by 638
Metadata
- Authors
- Carter, C. S., & Barch, D. M.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-17
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1131-1137
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- OpenAlex
- W2100927195
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 8.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Neuroscience-Based Approaches to Measuring and Improving Treatment Effects on Cognition in Schizophrenia: The CNTRICS Initiative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/schbul/sbm081
- The paper
- Carter, C. S., & Barch, D. M. (2007). Cognitive Neuroscience-Based Approaches to Measuring and Improving Treatment Effects on Cognition in Schizophrenia: The CNTRICS Initiative. Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbm081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.