Cited by 437Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

The cognitive neuroscience of schizophrenia.

Barch, Deanna M.·2005·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Individuals with schizophrenia experience a range of cognitive deficits and associated dysfunctions in the neural systems that support cognitive processes. This chapter reviews the literature on disturbances in working memory, executive control, and episodic memory in schizophrenia. Advances in basic cognitive neuroscience are described to help explain the cognitive neuroscience of schizophrenia. For working memory in schizophrenia, evidence is reviewed regarding deficits in the verbal (phonological loop) and nonverbal (visual-spatial scratch pad) buffer systems as well as in the central executive function. In the domain of episodic memory, evidence is reviewed for deficits in recollection versus familiarity processes in episodic memory. Also discussed are conceptual issues and potential confounds relevant to understanding the cognitive neuroscience of schizophrenia, including the role that cognitive deficits play in the developmental course of schizophrenia, relationships to specific symptom domains, behavioral performance confounds, and medication influences on behavioral performance and brain function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143959

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding that manipulation is more impaired than maintenance, along with evidence that visuospatial and verbal working memory manipulation are equally impaired, supports the view that working memory deficits in these disorders are due to impairment in the central executive aspect of working memory, rather than the content-specific maintenance systems.

    “The finding that manipulation is more impaired than maintenance, along with evidence that visuospatial and verbal WM manipulation are equally impaired, both support the view that WM deficits in these disorders are due to impairment in the central executive aspect of WM, rather than the content-specific maintenance systems (Barch, 2005)”
  • EF deficits across psychopathology cannot be easily explained by non-specific factors such as psychomotor slowing, differences in IQ or education, or medication use.

    “First, these deficits cannot be easily explained by non-specific factors such as psychomotor slowing, differences in IQ or education, or medication use (e.g., Barch, 2005; Forbes et al., 2009; Snyder, 2013; Snyder et al., 2015).”
  • EF deficits are present in attenuated form in unaffected family members of individuals with schizophrenia, BD, OCD, and PTSD.

    “Moreover, there is some evidence that EF deficits are primarily state-independent (manifest even when illness symptoms are not present, (e.g., Kurtz and Gerraty, 2009; Snyder, 2013) and present in attenuated form in unaffected family members of individuals with schizophrenia, BD, OCD, and PTSD, suggesting EF deficits may be an endophenotype for many forms of psychopathology (e.g., Barch, 2005; Gil”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barch, D. M.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Barch, Deanna M.
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2005-04-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
321-353
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2104217093
Cited by
437
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 24
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
schizophrenia, cognitive impairment, working memory, executive function, episodic memory, phonological loop, central executive function, symptom domains, antipsychotic effects
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Higher Nervous Activity, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Models, Neurological, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review