Cited by 875Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Quantification of subjective sleep quality in healthy elderly men and women using the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI)

Daniel J. Buysse, Charles F. Reynolds, Timothy H. Monk, Carolyn C. Hoch, Amy L. Yeager, David J. Kupfer·1991·Sleep

Abstract

Subjective sleep quality deteriorates with aging, but the extent to which this is a product of age itself, as opposed to the medical or psychiatric problems associated with aging, has not been carefully studied. To investigate this issue, we examined the subjective sleep quality of 44 healthy subjects over 80 years of age (20 men, 24 women), and 35 healthy subjects [corrected] between the ages of 20 and 30 (23 men, 12 women) using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). All subjects underwent rigorous medical and psychiatric evaluations to verify that they were in excellent physical and psychological health. Significant age effects were noted for the global PSQI score and several PSQI component scores, but overall sleep quality for the majority (68.1%) of 80-yr-olds fell within a categorically defined range for "good" sleepers. Measures of habitual sleep quality did not correlate strongly with most polysomnographic sleep measures, number of medications used or circadian measures in elderly subjects. These results show that subjective sleep quality does deteriorate in the healthy elderly, but not to the level seen in patients with sleep disorders. Extremely healthy elderly subjects appear to adapt in their perception of objectively disturbed sleep.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/14.4.331

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Hoch, C. C., Yeager, A. L., & Kupfer, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Daniel J. Buysse
Venue
Sleep
Published
1991-07-01
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
331-8
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W1704280769
Cited by
874
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 33
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01ag006836-04)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 06836)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-00295, MH-37869, R01MH037869)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
subjective sleep quality, aging, older adults, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, healthy older adults, sleep perception, sleep disorders, circadian rhythm, medication use, sex differences
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Arousal, Attitude to Health, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Sleep Stages, Sleep, REM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review