Cited by 128Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersMedication Adherence and Compliance

Neighborhood of Residence is Associated with Daily Adherence to CPAP Therapy

Open access
Platt, Alec B., Field, Samuel H., Asch, David A., Chen, Zhen, Patel, Nirav P., Gupta, Rajesh, Roche, Dominic F., Gurubhagavatula, Indira +2 more·2009·Sleep

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnea is poor. Risk factors for nonadherence are not well understood but may reflect individual or neighborhood socioeconomic factors. We sought to determine the association of socioeconomic status and initial CPAP adherence. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study, 2005 to 2006. SETTING: Philadelphia VA Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Of 330 consecutive veterans who met study criteria for initiation of CPAP therapy for newly diagnosed sleep apnea, 266 had complete data for study inclusion. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS: Through a multivariable logistic regression model, using an outcome of objectively measured CPAP use - 4 h daily during the first week of treatment, we tested whether patients from higher socioeconomic neighborhoods had higher CPAP adherence. We measured neighborhood socioeconomic status with an index derived from the 2000 U.S. Census at the block group-level composed of median household income, male and female employment, adult high school completion, married households, and minority composition. RESULTS: CPAP adherence > 4 h occurred on 48.9% of 1,805 patient-days observed for the 266 subjects. After adjustment for individual sociodemographic characteristics and medical comorbidity, the probability of daily CPAP use 4 h ranged from 34.1% (95% CI, 26.4-42.7) for subjects from a low socioeconomic neighborhood (5th percentile) to 62.3% (95% CI, 53.8-70.1) for subjects from a high (95th percentile) neighborhood. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective cohort of veterans, initial CPAP adherence was closely associated with higher neighborhood socioeconomic factors. Future investigation should target specific impediments to adherence in the home and neighborhood environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/32.6.799

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing data suggest disparities in PAP adherence across socioeconomic and racial groups.

    “Since that time, very few studies have examined this relationship, though increasing data suggests disparities exist with PAP adherence across socioeconomic and racial groups1095–1097 and use of the 4-h, 70% threshold may be contributing to reduced access to treatment by rendering users below this threshold ineligible for coverage.”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [1097]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Platt, A. B., Field, S. H., Asch, D. A., Chen, Z., Patel, N. P., Gupta, R., Roche, D. F., Gurubhagavatula, I., Christie, J. D., & Kuna, S. T.
Affiliations
  • Reading Hospital (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Platt, Alec B.
Venue
Sleep
Published
2009-06
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
799-806
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W1515645811
Cited by
128
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007713, T-32 HL07713-14)
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (R01OH009149, R01-OH-009149-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
CPAP adherence, continuous positive airway pressure, obstructive sleep apnea, neighborhood socioeconomic status, veterans, sleep apnea treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Probability, Residence Characteristics, Retrospective Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Veterans, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Multivariate Analysis, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review