Cited by 19Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Within-Group Effect Size Benchmarks for Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Adult Depression

Rubin, Allen, Yu, Miao·2017·Social Work Research

Abstract

This article provides benchmark data on within-group effect sizes from published randomized clinical trials supporting the efficacy of cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) in the treatment of adult depression. Data from 84 studies that met the inclusion criteria were recorded independently by the two authors, with a 95.8% agreement rate. Aggregate within-group effect size benchmarks are provided for CBT groups and control groups and are broken down by level of depression, type of control group, type of CBT approach, type of depression measure, type of data analysis (intent-to-treat versus completers, only), and whether participants had any comorbidity. Overall, the aggregate within-group effect size estimates for CBT groups were 1.19 for self-report outcome measures and 1.52 for interviews. For control groups the estimate was 0.48 for self-reports and interviews. When treating depressed adult clients, community-based practitioners can use these benchmarks as a comparison tool to evaluate the adequacy of the way they are adopting or adapting CBT and in making decisions about whether to continue providing CBT in the same manner or to modify or replace it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/swr/svx011

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubin, A., & Yu, M.
Affiliations
University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Rubin, Allen
Venue
Social Work Research
Published
2017-07-19
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
135-144
ISSN
  • 1070-5309 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-6838
OpenAlex
W2737505385
Cited by
19
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Work Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, adult depression, randomized controlled trials, control groups, comorbidities, self-reported outcome measures, treatment adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review