The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toxicity and Tissue Distribution of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Mice
Open accessAbstract
The development of technology enables the reduction of material size in science. The use of particle reduction in size from micro to nanoscale not only provides benefits to diverse scientific fields but also poses potential risks to humans and the environment. For the successful application of nanomaterials in bioscience, it is essential to understand the biological fate and potential toxicity of nanoparticles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biological distribution as well as the potential toxicity of magnetic nanoparticles to enable their diverse applications in life science, such as drug development, protein detection, and gene delivery. We recently synthesized biocompatible silica-overcoated magnetic nanoparticles containing rhodamine B isothiocyanate (RITC) within a silica shell of controllable thickness [MNPs@SiO2(RITC)]. In this study, the MNPs@SiO2(RITC) with 50-nm thickness were used as a model nanomaterial. After intraperitoneal administration of MNPs@SiO2(RITC) for 4 weeks into mice, the nanoparticles were detected in the brain, indicating that such nanosized materials can penetrate blood-brain barrier (BBB) without disturbing its function or producing apparent toxicity. After a 4-week observation, MNPs@SiO2(RITC) was still present in various organs without causing apparent toxicity. Taken together, our results demonstrated that magnetic nanoparticles of 50-nm size did not cause apparent toxicity under the experimental conditions of this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NeuN, a neuronal specific nuclear protein in vertebratesxs
Mullen, R. J., Buck, C. R., & Smith, A. M. (1992) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.116.1.201 · Cited by 2,351
Cited by
Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer
Davis, M. E., Chen, Z., & Shin, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2614 · Cited by 4,233
Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects
Klaine, S. J., Alvarez, P. J. J., Batley, G. E., Fernandes, T. F., Handy, R. D., Lyon, D. Y., Mahendra, S., McLaughlin, M. J., & Lead, J. R. (2008) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1897/08-090.1 · Cited by 2,764
Reddy, L. H., Arias, J. L., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300068p · Cited by 2,010
Sharifi, S., Behzadi, S., Laurent, S., Laird Forrest, M., Stroeve, P., & Mahmoudi, M. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15188f · Cited by 1,460
Potential toxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION)
Singh, N., Jenkins, G. J. S., Asadi, R., & Doak, S. H. (2010) · Nano Reviews · doi:10.3402/nano.v1i0.5358 · Cited by 1,112
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J. S., Yoon, T.-J., Yu, K. N., Kim, B. G., Park, S. J., Kim, H. W., Lee, K. H., Park, S. B., Lee, J.-K., & Cho, M. H.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10-19
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 338-347
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-6080
- OpenAlex
- W2121692571
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicity and Tissue Distribution of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/kfj027
- The paper
- Kim, J. S., Yoon, T.-J., Yu, K. N., Kim, B. G., Park, S. J., Kim, H. W., Lee, K. H., Park, S. B., Lee, J.-K., & Cho, M. H. (2006). Toxicity and Tissue Distribution of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Mice. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfj027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.