The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury
Abstract
Community integration is defined as integration into a home-like setting, integration into a social network, and integration into productive activities such as employment, school, or volunteer work. For the purpose of evaluating outcomes for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who are provided with rehabilitation services in model systems programs, community integration was assessed using the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ). The CIQ was found to have good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. It could also discriminate between individuals with TBI and individuals who have no apparent disabilities. Individuals treated in model systems programs revealed significantly better scores on home integration and social integration when compared to a large community sample of individuals with TBI. Although these findings are preliminary, it appears that the CIQ is a useful measure for rehabilitation program evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Participation in the Occupations of Everyday Life
Law, M. (2002) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.56.6.640 · Cited by 940
Psychosocial and Emotional Outcomes 10 Years Following Traumatic Brain Injury
Draper, K., Ponsford, J., & Schönberger, M. (2007) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.htr.0000290972.63753.a7 · Cited by 279
Novack, T. A., Bush, B. A., Meythaler, J. M., & Canupp, K. (2001) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.18222 · Cited by 202
Sayer, N. A., Frazier, P., Orazem, R. J., Murdoch, M., Gravely, A., Carlson, K. F., Hintz, S., & Noorbaloochi, S. (2011) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.20706 · Cited by 180
Measures of social outcomes in disability research
Dijkers, M. P. J. M., Whiteneck, G., & El-Jaroudi, R. (2000) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.20627 · Cited by 174
Social communication skills in persons with post-acute traumatic brain injury: Three perspectives
Dahlberg, C., Hawley, L., Morey, C., Newman, J., Cusick, C. P., & Harrison-Felix, C. (2006) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699050600664574 · Cited by 171
FORTIN, S., GODBOUT, L., & BRAUN, C. (2003) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70109-6 · Cited by 165
Measuring what matters: Key rehabilitation outcomes
Whiteneck, G. G. (1994) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/0003-9993(94)90080-9 · Cited by 140
Stewart, K., & Townley, G. (2020) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12456 · Cited by 75
Karlovits, M. A. M. (1999) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/026990599121052 · Cited by 68
Faria, A. L., Latorre, J., Silva Cameirão, M., Bermúdez i Badia, S., & Llorens, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233346 · Cited by 46
Gontkovsky, S. T., Russum, P., & Stokic, D. S. (2009) · NeuroRehabilitation: An International, Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.3233/nre-2009-0467 · Cited by 47
Teo, S. H., Fong, K. N. K., Chen, Z., & Chung, R. C. K. (2020) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2020.1802668 · Cited by 39
Sathananthan, N., Dimech-Betancourt, B., Morris, E., Vicendese, D., Knox, L., Gillanders, D., Das Nair, R., & Wong, D. (2022) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2021.1971094 · Cited by 31
“Participation was assessed with the 15-item Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ; Willer et al., 1993).”
MethodKimonides, S., Cavuoto, M. G., De Silva, L., & Kinsella, G. J. (2018) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/10749357.2018.1489570 · Cited by 21
Foote, H., Bowen, A., Cotterill, S., Hill, G., Pieri, M., & Patchwood, E. (2023) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/02692155221144554 · Cited by 7
Kim, M. Y., Jethani, P., Kang, E., Lipsey, K. L., & Foster, E. R. (2024) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2023.10.009 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Willer, B., Rosenthal, M., Kreutzer, J. S., Gordon, W. A., & Rempel, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-87
- ISSN
- 0885-9701 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030070428
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
